- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,910
- Reaction score
- 6,255
No it's too early. They will hear mid to late FebruaryDid anyone who interviewed in January hear anything back?
No it's too early. They will hear mid to late FebruaryDid anyone who interviewed in January hear anything back?
Same!!! We might have interviewed togetherACCEPTED!!! got email around 9 am PST. Interviewed mid-late September
No it's too early. They will hear mid to late February
Congrats!!! Did you interview on the 23rd of Sep?Same!!! We might have interviewed together
Go big or go homeFelt risky today, sent admission an email saying I'm really interested and want a II. This process has made me have No shame
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Hey let us know if it works! GodspeedFelt risky today, sent admission an email saying I'm really interested and want a II. This process has made me have No shame
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
no the 30thCongrats!!! Did you interview on the 23rd of Sep?
Hey guys, I have an interesting situation. I live in Albany (NYS Resident) and I've gotten two tickets that were violation offenses. According to NYS Law, these violations are not crimes. Thus on the secondary I did not mention this since they said have you been convicted of any crimes. Now that I've gotten accepted, do you think this technicality will harm me? Should I call the school and tell them about this?
P.S. I already did the Certiphi background check and these violations were not listed anywhere there.
Hey guys, I have an interesting situation. I live in Albany (NYS Resident) and I've gotten two tickets that were violation offenses. According to NYS Law, these violations are not crimes. Thus on the secondary I did not mention this since they said have you been convicted of any crimes. Now that I've gotten accepted, do you think this technicality will harm me? Should I call the school and tell them about this?
P.S. I already did the Certiphi background check and these violations were not listed anywhere there.
There will be one, but I don't think it has been made yet.Does anyone know if there's a fb page that we can become part of for the 2021 class?? and congrats to everyone who has heard back!! yayyy future doctors 🙂))
Buy the MSARHi everyone! I really did not know where to post this but I was hoping someone could help me. I am actually a Canadian premed student and I am looking to apply to albert einstein. I have been trying to find admission statistics for gpa and mcat scores but I have not been able to find any. Could someone give me an idea or point me in the right direction? Much appreciated!
I'll save you the $21 or so dollars it cost to buy the MSAR. Albert Einstein applicant MCAT average is a 34. Matriculation average is a 33 with 10/90 percentile range of 32-37. Average gpa is 3.8 with 10/90 percentile range of 3.6-4.0Hi everyone! I really did not know where to post this but I was hoping someone could help me. I am actually a Canadian premed student and I am looking to apply to albert einstein. I have been trying to find admission statistics for gpa and mcat scores but I have not been able to find any. Could someone give me an idea or point me in the right direction? Much appreciated!
I'll save you the $21 or so dollars it cost to buy the MSAR. Albert Einstein applicant MCAT average is a 34. Matriculation average is a 33 with 10/90 percentile range of 32-37. Average gpa is 3.8 with 10/90 percentile range of 3.6-4.0
The applicant average of everyone applying to Albert Einstein for the 2015 class is 34. The average of the people who matriculate in the final 2015 class is 33. That is what it says on MSAR. Somtimes the matriculate average is lower than the applicant pool for a certain school because people with higher mcat scores choose to go to a "higher ranked school" as opposed to matriculate at Albert Einstein.Do you mean accepted average is 34? The applicant median is much lower.
The applicant average of everyone applying to Albert Einstein for the 2015 class is 34. The average of the people who matriculate in the final 2015 class is 33. That is what it says on MSAR. Somtimes the matriculate average is lower than the applicant pool for a certain school because people with higher mcat scores choose to go to a "higher ranked school" as opposed to matriculate at Albert Einstein.
Not sure what you mean. But here it is directly from MSAR for the person who was asking.That is a mistake on MSAR. It says "applicant average" but it actually means "accepted average." The applicant average for the school and for the nation is above that table.
I get what you mean now. Thanks for clearing that upThat is a mistake on MSAR. It says "applicant average" but it actually means "accepted average." The applicant average for the school and for the nation is above that table.
Sooo for those awesome people who have scoured previous years threads. If we didnt hear back during that first wave, when can we expect waitlist decisions?
rejected pre-ii, complete july
Did AECOM start sending out pre-II rejections yet?
I sent in an ITA email last week and they replied by saying that the committee needs to invite me first.. is this how ITA works? I thought that the whole point of it was so that you are reviewed faster?
+1 sucks cause i thought this interview went really well!Rejected post-interview as well, interviewed at the end of October. Good luck to those still in the running and congrats to everyone who's already been accepted!
rejected post interview. I did not send any thank you letters, I believe this school really prefers them. I recall they emphasized the mailing address for your interviewers etc. Didn't love my interview day here and have other options thankfully, phew
Ouch I figured they wouldn't really reject post interview.
edit: ha just got one, too. What a waste of $1000 to go interview. Interviewed in January
rejected post interview. I did not send any thank you letters, I believe this school really prefers them. I recall they emphasized the mailing address for your interviewers etc. Didn't love my interview day here and have other options thankfully, phew
It is ludicrous how many people this school interviews... straight up offensive frankly. My interview group was like 40-50 people, they herded us around like cattle. They make you grovel and brown nose for an acceptance off the HPWL or even just a WL position at all. And then end up accepting the kids who are from Long Island/NYC area preferentially anyway. Might as well only just interview them off the bat as well as the Cali kids who can't get into Cali schools then and don't make other people fly across the country. A waste of everyone's resources all around.
Pre-II silence since July!!!![]()
It is ludicrous how many people this school interviews... straight up offensive frankly. They make you grovel and brown nose for an acceptance off the HPWL or even just a WL position at all. And then end up accepting the kids who are from Long Island/NYC area preferentially anyway. Might as well just interview them off the bat then and don't make people fly across the country. A waste of everyone's resources all around.
As much as I hate schools "over interviewing" for their class, I think it's just a product of it being a buyers market. If a diverse class composition is important to them, then it makes sense to interview a ton of people. Whether or not 1,000 interviewees is excessive is the question. I think it is excessive, but I'm not running the show here.
Schools have an interest in yield protection. When you're competing against great private and public schools in NYC, it can get rough for a school to turn acceptances into matriculants. I don't blame them for wanting applicants to show genuine interest. If you don't really want to go, then don't be disingenuous and send them a letter of interest. It only devalues "true" letters of interest.
I can genuinely relate though. My IIs have been at OOS publics or intensely poor post-II acceptance rates and no acceptances yet.
As much as I hate schools "over interviewing" for their class, I think it's just a product of it being a buyers market. If a diverse class composition is important to them, then it makes sense to interview a ton of people. Whether or not 1,000 interviewees is excessive is the question. I think it is excessive, but I'm not running the show here.
Schools have an interest in yield protection. When you're competing against great private and public schools in NYC, it can get rough for a school to turn acceptances into matriculants. I don't blame them for wanting applicants to show genuine interest. If you don't really want to go, then don't be disingenuous and send them a letter of interest. It only devalues "true" letters of interest.
I can genuinely relate though. My IIs have been at OOS publics or intensely poor post-II acceptance rates and no acceptances yet.