non-trad-sad-man
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 42
Wow massively reduced character counts.. crap
Is there even a screen?
Yah all of the UCs have holistic screens
Same🙁Yeah especially UCSF and UCLA i think, still haven't gotten UCSF
Anyone know from past cycles if UCLA sends secondaries out in waves or is it safe to assume that I am screened out since I did not receive one today?
Yeah, I just navigated to the competencies page from the med school homepage.Is anyone else having trouble opening the "UCLA Competencies" page? It's under the Scholastic Achievements tab and keeps leading me to an error page...
I was just looking at last year’s thread and it seems like in years prior it was always 800 char, but last year they increased it to 4000. Glad to see they cut it back down!Wow massively reduced character counts.. crap
I was just looking at last year’s thread and it seems like in years prior it was always 800 char, but last year they increased it to 4000. Glad to see they cut it back down!
Just read farther in the thread and realized that hahathat was a mistake. It wasn't supposed to be 4000. They changed it back to 800.
I wrote 1000 charFor the work experiences question, it has a 4000 character limit but due to the other shorter character limits I doubt they want me to write that much. Are you guys just giving a short description of your job, responsibilities etc.?
Does anyone know what percentage of apps get secondary?
Anyone know from past cycles if UCLA sends secondaries out in waves or is it safe to assume that I am screened out since I did not receive one today?
First post here! I got a secondary today but after the 4000 character mishap in previous years, does anyone think that the 300 character thing is a mishap or do you all think that it's the actual character limit?
That's the actual, if I remember right the 4000 was a mishap last yrFirst post here! I got a secondary today but after the 4000 character mishap in previous years, does anyone think that the 300 character thing is a mishap or do you all think that it's the actual character limit?
thanks!!Incoming MS1 here! idk how much I can help but happy to do what I can!
Just wanted to share that I got my secondary on August 11 last year, it was my last secondary I received.
Checked my app from last year and definitely had two 300 character questions
Don't think I can help much here 🙁 I applied straight through, so I really didn't have any major work experiences. I always felt like the prompts that had a huge character limit were an opportunity to talk as much as you wanted (let's say there was one thing that you barely got to touch on, but wanted to expand) but ultimately didn't have to fill up. If you have nothing to add, give a quick summary of what you've already said and take the time to point out a few things you really want them to take away from those experiences; if you have more to touch on, use those characters!How did you approach the job description prompt? Did you just rewrite what you had already included in your primary?
Does anyone know if we can use high school work, or AP credit that doesn't show up on our university transcript, to fulfill the Spanish competency?
Thats what I did, no matter how I phrased it it was always 3 sentences max. The problem I have is deciding which one is my most scholarly work. Is it the one with the most hours? The one that was closest to publication? The one that was published? The one that had a poster presentation? Or the one that was most meaningful, medium amount of hours, and was not published. Someone please help, this 300 char prompt is driving me cray.How are yall talking about your most scholarly work in just 300 characters. Are you guys just stating what it is/was and tagging in hours, dates and advisor? I can't go more than like 2/3 sentences before running out of space.
I'd say pick the most meaningful one just because you'll be able to explain it more genuinely if asked during the interviewThats what I did, no matter how I phrased it it was always 3 sentences max. The problem I have is deciding which one is my most scholarly work. Is it the one with the most hours? The one that was closest to publication? The one that was published? The one that had a poster presentation? Or the one that was most meaningful, medium amount of hours, and was not published. Someone please help, this 300 char prompt is driving me cray.
thank you <3I'd say pick the most meaningful one just because you'll be able to explain it more genuinely if asked during the interview
still having a hard time understanding the school's intention for giving 4000 characters for employment. Do you guys think they ask to rephrase the actual description of the work + detail example/what I have learned from it? Idk if I am doing it correctly by doing that.
I know this is still hella early, but has anyone who has more time than me spent long enough looking at the previous UCLA Threads to have any idea whether getting an early secondary (and then early II, if I would be so lucky!) correlates with the likelihood of getting a geffen scholarship? I love this school and finances are a huge concern for me so I was super excited to get the secondary right away!
Worth noting that, unlike traditional interview schools with open files, it's extremely unlikely (but not impossible) that you will be asked about your research during our interviews. Sometimes the interviewer will get a memo to ask an applicant about a particular part of the app that the (sub)committee will want to know more about, but they are unlikely to request more info on bread-and-butter research unless there really is something that deserves further explanation (say, a Nobel prize, or egregious ethical misconduct).thank you <3
It never has to be related to medicine. That goes for other schools too. Most interviewees at open file schools will be asked about whatever unique hobby/interest they mentioned in their app. Even at closed file schools like us, it will give the committee member presenting you an identifying tidbit to help them and everyone around the table remember you 5 minutes from now. Think of it as part of your relevant PMH in the ID/one-liner. "This is John Smith, a 23 yo M w/Hx of recent travel to Ohio for spelunking 2 wk ago, and scribing x 1 yr s/p graduating from UCLA w/B.S. in psychobio in 2017, who p/w a CC of wanting to get into UCLA." It becomes a lot less memorable and a lot easier to confuse you with the other 20 files in the pile who also scribed and were UCLA psychobio majors if you didn't tell us about your textbook risk factor for histoplasmosis.For the question asking about the most important non-academic activity in your life, could I talk about travelling or do you think it has to be something related to medicine?
Don't use all the characters provided if you don't need to--holds true for any essay, any school. You don't need to repeat anything that was already in the primary app. Think of this as optional space to elaborate on anything that you need to, but don't bore your busy readers with unnecessary info; they already have several other files in their pile standing between them and bedtime tonight. Personally, I generally scoff and roll my eyes at the sentences that attempt to explicitly lay out how someone's experience as an XYZ opened their eyes and will make them such a better doctor because of blahdeblahblah, and tell people to leave that sort of fluff out. Unless it's a truly extraordinary revelation that the reader wouldn't have been able to understand otherwise...but I have yet to see an example of that in app the apps I've read.still having a hard time understanding the school's intention for giving 4000 characters for employment. Do you guys think they ask to rephrase the actual description of the work + detail example/what I have learned from it? Idk if I am doing it correctly by doing that.
Not entirely sure what your question is, but I don't see anything wrong with including any paid position. After including it, just don't wax poetic about it if it's standard summer research or scribing--we'd practically know what the job description for those looks like even if you left it blank.To add onto that, are they straight up looking for a job you've held before? Or, for example, would salaried research during the summer or scribing fit this description.
Just a little thrown off because of how official sounding the "Company Name" heading is.
As above, you don't need to use the space if you don't need to use it. If you ran out of space on the AMCAS character counts, then great here's some extra room to type. But no reviewer is going to mark you down for being concise, avoiding repetition, and letting them get back to seeing their family/charting/sleeping a few minutes earlier. A common complaint among residents and attendings is that med student are not concise, and they dread the 20-30 minute long student presentations.I can't believe they're actually asking us to repeat our work experiences, especially since I have 5. Why did I spend so much time perfecting my AMCAS descriptions???
There is a weak correlation, I don't know the R^2 off the top of my head but it is going to be pretty small. Early interview dates have a little better predictive value. That said, receiving secondaries earlier does have a fairly strong correlation with early interview dates...assuming you complete the secondary in a timely manner. Try not to read too much into it though, med school admissions in general can seem extremely random, and the scholarship committee reader may not be as impressed as the screeners/(sub)committee readers by your 3 gold medals in ballroom tango, because they just finished talking about a file with 30.I know this is still hella early, but has anyone who has more time than me spent long enough looking at the previous UCLA Threads to have any idea whether getting an early secondary (and then early II, if I would be so lucky!) correlates with the likelihood of getting a geffen scholarship? I love this school and finances are a huge concern for me so I was super excited to get the secondary right away!
Nope! The first email I got from UCLA was the one inviting me to complete my secondarydid you ever get an email before that saying that your primary application was received?
Is it a deal breaker if I haven't taken any Spanish? I had no idea this was a competency, and I don't know how to speak the language. Should I still submit?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Spanish is "highly recommended," not required per DGSOM's website.Is it a deal breaker if I haven't taken any Spanish? I had no idea this was a competency, and I don't know how to speak the language. Should I still submit?
Ya I think its more of a "soft" requirement. Do-able to get in without it but definitely more difficult. Obviously it would be a huge bonus to be clinically fluent in LA and there's enough quality applicants with spanish that it's not too difficult to prioritize them without losing quality of the matriculating classSomeone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Spanish is "highly recommended," not required per DGSOM's website.
Medical School Requirements at DGSOM - David Geffen School of Medicine - Los Angeles, CA
I didn't check the Spanish competency box on my secondary and nobody seemed to mind. And the admissions requirements overall have relaxed since my cycle. Just means I have to use the translator phone more often than some of my classmates. But there are plentyyyyy of us here who speak none/nearly no Spanish.Is it a deal breaker if I haven't taken any Spanish? I had no idea this was a competency, and I don't know how to speak the language. Should I still submit?
Is it a deal breaker if I haven't taken any Spanish? I had no idea this was a competency, and I don't know how to speak the language. Should I still submit?