2020-2021 UT Austin (Dell)

Started by TheDataKing
Med School Insiders
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
NPComplete said:
From what I was told by a Dell re-applicant, that was the exact same email word for word as last year. I think the "currently only about 7% of the total applicant pool receives an interview" actually refers to their secondary invite, not a traditional interview invite.

Edit: grammar
Click to expand...
We talked about this on page 1 of this thread. This year they will try to interview 20% of the applicants rather than 7% as in past years.
We all think the "in-person interview" part should have been deleted from this year's spiel.
Link: #19
 
harmony14 said:
II received. secondary transmitted July 15.

" Dell Medical School utilizes a unique secondary application, a video secondary. Our goal is to give a greater number of applicants an opportunity to present themselves to the selection committee in their own voice. Currently only about 7% of the total applicant pool receives an interview. We hope to extend this opportunity to more than 20% of the applicant pool this year without the added expense of travel. Once completed and reviewed, we will then invite approximately 360 candidates for an on campus interview. "

does dell have 2 interviews? 1 virtual and the other in-person.
Click to expand...

Its counterintuitive b.c 360 is about 7% lol. But it kinda makes sense since they send out ~100 acceptance and 50 matriculate so interview about 5-6x their class size?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
jazzieyazzie said:
I attended today's Dell interview day, so I can try to answer questions about how the day was to the best of my ability (without being too specific about my interview questions and stuff, obviously). Overall, it was very relaxed and I was not as nervous as I thought I'd be!
Click to expand...
Can you please shed some light on the format (one-on-one, MMI, both)?
 
Chitaku said:
Can you please shed some light on the format (one-on-one, MMI, both)?
Click to expand...
Of course! The one-on-one was a 25 minute interview with a faculty member over zoom. It was very conversational; my interview ended up being about an interesting point I had in my PS and some of my ECs/hobbies, but they were very casual questions, though I’m sure there is some variation based on interviewer. Honestly I felt that the interview should’ve been longer because I was enjoying our conversation so much!
We then had a group interview, which was basically a recorded zoom session in which we were grouped with 4 other applicants and were given a problem, and we spent the allotted time discussing and coming up with a solution to the problem (it’s not a “one correct answer” problem so they really wanna see your justification more than the final answer you choose EDIT: as per wysdoc's comment, this portion of the day is definitely more focused on your ability to work on a team and collaborate without being too uninvolved or too authoritative).
Finally, the MMI part was done on the same platform that the video secondary was conducted, so it’s asynchronous. As you’d expect, it was a mix of scenario based questions and questions about your own experiences. That wasn’t too bad either; there were 5 sets of questions, each with a follow up question = 10 questions total. Just like with the group interview, there isn’t a correct answer for these so they really emphasize that they want you to “think out loud.”
 
Last edited:
jazzieyazzie said:
Of course! The one-on-one was a 25 minute interview with a faculty member over zoom. It was very conversational; my interview ended up being about an interesting point I had in my PS and some of my ECs/hobbies, but they were very casual questions, though I’m sure there is some variation based on interviewer. Honestly I felt that the interview should’ve been longer because I was enjoying our conversation so much!
We then had a group interview, which was basically a recorded zoom session in which we were grouped with 4 other applicants and were given a problem, and we spent the allotted time discussing and coming up with a solution to the problem (it’s not a “one correct answer” problem so they really wanna see your justification more than the final answer you choose).
Finally, the MMI part was done on the same platform that the video secondary was conducted, so it’s asynchronous. As you’d expect, it was a mix of scenario based questions and questions about your own experiences. That wasn’t too bad either; there were 5 sets of questions, each with a follow up question = 10 questions total. Just like with the group interview, there isn’t a correct answer for these so they really emphasize that they want you to “think out loud.”
Click to expand...

Wow that is a lot
 
harmony14 said:
Wow that is a lot
Click to expand...
@harmony14 normally a school would have all day to see how you interact with not only the interviewers, but the receptionists, med students, and other applicants. It's not "a lot" for them to want to see you in several settings like this, even remotely.

Also, for the rest of you with upcoming interviews here or elsewhere, @jazzieyazzie had an opinion on the group activity portion, "they really wanna see your justification more than the final answer you choose". Actually, they want to see if you can work cooperatively. Neither be the group member that says nothing, nor the group member who mows down all the other members because you think your ideas are better and you want to "get the right answer" or want your idea to be "it".

For an MMI type activity, "thinking out loud" to show how you arrive at your opinion is indeed the point.
 
wysdoc said:
@harmony14 normally a school would have all day to see how you interact with not only the interviewers, but the receptionists, med students, and other applicants. It's not "a lot" for them to want to see you in several settings like this, even remotely.

Also, for the rest of you with upcoming interviews here or elsewhere, @jazzieyazzie had an opinion on the group activity portion, "they really wanna see your justification more than the final answer you choose". Actually, they want to see if you can work cooperatively. Neither be the group member that says nothing, nor the group member who mows down all the other members because you think your ideas are better and you want to "get the right answer" or want your idea to be "it".

For an MMI type activity, "thinking out loud" to show how you arrive at your opinion is indeed the point.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the input and clarification. I understand interview day when you are observed and should be on best behavior the entire day. When I said a lot, I meant that there were a lot of formal evaluations of the interviewee rather than informal. I believe this can result in artificial behavior.

But I'm not complaining by the way. It's just different compared to other interviews I've heard about.
 
For an MMI type activity, "thinking out loud" to show how you arrive at your opinion is indeed the point.
Click to expand...

Can't stress this enough.

wysdoc said:
Actually, they want to see if you can work cooperatively. Neither be the group member that says nothing, nor the group member who mows down all the other members because you think your ideas are better and you want to "get the right answer" or want your idea to be "it".
Click to expand...

And this. Medicine is considered more and more as a collaborative field. If you are in a group discussion, it is important to be nice to everyone, voice your view, ask questions that elicit more input from others, dont try to prove anyone wrong. Consider it a brainstorming session where nothing is shot down.
 
wysdoc said:
@harmony14 normally a school would have all day to see how you interact with not only the interviewers, but the receptionists, med students, and other applicants. It's not "a lot" for them to want to see you in several settings like this, even remotely.

Also, for the rest of you with upcoming interviews here or elsewhere, @jazzieyazzie had an opinion on the group activity portion, "they really wanna see your justification more than the final answer you choose". Actually, they want to see if you can work cooperatively. Neither be the group member that says nothing, nor the group member who mows down all the other members because you think your ideas are better and you want to "get the right answer" or want your idea to be "it".

For an MMI type activity, "thinking out loud" to show how you arrive at your opinion is indeed the point.
Click to expand...
yes absolutely, thank you for clarifying that point!
 
jazzieyazzie said:
Of course! The one-on-one was a 25 minute interview with a faculty member over zoom. It was very conversational; my interview ended up being about an interesting point I had in my PS and some of my ECs/hobbies, but they were very casual questions, though I’m sure there is some variation based on interviewer. Honestly I felt that the interview should’ve been longer because I was enjoying our conversation so much!
We then had a group interview, which was basically a recorded zoom session in which we were grouped with 4 other applicants and were given a problem, and we spent the allotted time discussing and coming up with a solution to the problem (it’s not a “one correct answer” problem so they really wanna see your justification more than the final answer you choose EDIT: as per wysdoc's comment, this portion of the day is definitely more focused on your ability to work on a team and collaborate without being too uninvolved or too authoritative).
Finally, the MMI part was done on the same platform that the video secondary was conducted, so it’s asynchronous. As you’d expect, it was a mix of scenario based questions and questions about your own experiences. That wasn’t too bad either; there were 5 sets of questions, each with a follow up question = 10 questions total. Just like with the group interview, there isn’t a correct answer for these so they really emphasize that they want you to “think out loud.”
Click to expand...

Do you remember how long the MMI is?
 
jazzieyazzie said:
It took me like 30-40 minutes, but they gave us an hour in case we needed to take breaks between questions. They gave us like 1-2 minutes to think about each question, and the initial questions had 4 min of speaking time, and the follow up questions had around 1.5 minutes of speaking time.
Click to expand...
So is it just like we are speaking into our own camera
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
QUick question guys, for those who attended the social zoom meeting, is it mandatory to have our cameras on throughout the entire time? I'd have a class during that same period which I really do not want to miss, but I also want to listen in the conversations during the social. Any help 🙁
 
Does anyone know if we can have our cameras off during the social? I'd love to listen in but I also have to be in class.
 
Soooo does anyone want to wildly speculate about whether Dell is still giving out secondary invites? I realize it's a bit late in the TX cycle; my TMDSAS app wasn't verified until late Aug, unfortunately (OOS but w/ ties to TX). Still holding out hope though!
 
golgibubbles said:
Soooo does anyone want to wildly speculate about whether Dell is still giving out secondary invites? I realize it's a bit late in the TX cycle; my TMDSAS app wasn't verified until late Aug, unfortunately (OOS but w/ ties to TX). Still holding out hope though!
Click to expand...

The priority deadline for the secondary isn’t until 15 November, so I imagine they’ll be giving them out for a while yet.
 
Last edited:
golgibubbles said:
Soooo does anyone want to wildly speculate about whether Dell is still giving out secondary invites? I realize it's a bit late in the TX cycle; my TMDSAS app wasn't verified until late Aug, unfortunately (OOS but w/ ties to TX). Still holding out hope though!
Click to expand...
Yes they take their time reading your primaries and space out secondaries
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
PaxVobis said:
Someone said they submitted in May and received a secondary in December, so it is possible. But I’m not sure how often this happens, so I would be optimistic but don’t place all your bets on this school 🙂
Click to expand...
Isn't the secondary due in November though?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
gsims2 said:
I received a II on 10/2, interviewing tomorrow morning (10/13). LM 67, IS, ORM. Just thought I would share some hope for those with a less than stellar LM!
Click to expand...
Goodluck tomorrow! You got this 🙂 When did you submit your secondary if you dont mind me asking?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

wysdoc
2025-2026 Dell
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
338
Views
91K
Novalis88
N
wysdoc
2024-2025 Dell
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
267
Views
72K
PolarIceLongLastingFlavor
PolarIceLongLastingFlavor
wysdoc
2025-2026 UT Tyler
2 3 4 5
Replies
209
Views
57K
deleted1241275
D
wysdoc
2021-2022 UT Austin (Dell)
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
254
Views
97K
Bot Puppet
Bot Puppet
wysdoc
2025-2026 UT Rio Grande Valley
2 3 4
Replies
183
Views
52K
strugglingpremed1
S