- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 135
- Reaction score
- 111
There is more to life than average MCAT or GPA. While I have seen your argument that MCAT is a predictor 'typical' student, I'm not so sure I've seen my share of "typical" students. I know the valedictorian from my wife's class had a horrible MCAT, but then he went on to rank first in his class and (I believe) had the highest board scores of his class.
And despite medians or means or any other number, you will still have applicants that are well above that. Take me for instance. 33 MCAT (11/11/11), a PharmD (with 3.7 GPA in pharmacy school). I'm applying to this school.
I try to focus less on the numbers because there is so much to being a good physician. Otherwise, you would not be able to have two graduates from the same school have such differing aptitudes as physicians. I know two residents that graduated in the same class from the same school. One is significantly sharper than the other, yet, in theory, they had the same education.
In my opinion, the education itself matters less than the student. Good students will excel at any school and become good physicians. Even a lazy graduate of Harvard or Yale can still be an awful physician, even if they had brilliant stats going in.
That's one of the things I like so much about osteopathic schools. They have a more holistic approach and realize that people are so much more than just a few numbers. The schools try to pick the people they think will excel in their program. It needs to be a mutual fit, both student for the school and school for the student.