Wwar of Three WWorlds- Game Thread

Veterinary Science Graduate Certificate from UofI
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
LetItSnow said:
Honestly, I'm kinda tempted to suggest everyone move to one world. Doesn't matter which one.
Click to expand...

Mostly for the game-breaking lulz, btw. @Trilt will get on board with it, right? For the lulz? :)
Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Kam325 said:
I do not have the slightest ****ing idea whether you were nominated by wolves, or are a wolf, or whatever.
Click to expand...

This is important.

No one was saying ANYONE is a wolf, it's just suspicious when multiple people are advocating for a person when we know that the wolves will likely be trying to get one of their own a spot as gatekeeper.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
SummerTheLynx said:
But can people go though the gate tn? Because if they can then that sort of screws up the whole premise of the role, as it allows wolves to set up appropriately. I am hoping it's just a "nothing can happen" sort of night with respect to movement.
Click to expand...
Anyone can move anywhere. No Gate Keeper means free for all.
 
DVMDream said:
So wolves have equal access to everyone? I mean I see how that could be beneficial too but it could seriously backfire.
Click to expand...

Sure, but then so do the villagers. Assuming we have a seer, they can seer anyone. Assuming we have a blocker, they can block anyone. Etc.

It turns it into a straightforward game. And straightforward is always better for villagers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
LetItSnow said:
Sure, but then so do the villagers. Assuming we have a seer, they can seer anyone. Assuming we have a blocker, they can block anyone. Etc.

It turns it into a straightforward game. And straightforward is always better for villagers.
Click to expand...

Yeah I see that too guess I'm just not as convinced the benefit outweighs the risk.
 
LetItSnow said:
Maybe I'm misinterpreting it, but it sounds like anyone can go anywhere. Sez Lupin (too lazy to forum-quote, but): "There are no restrictions to where you can move to [...]"

Unless I'm missing the caveat or something else.
Click to expand...
See, that's frustrating now, as wolves can set up. But I guess so can we. I have a thought and I want to see where people stand on it. What does everyone think about making one of the places a 4 person island. If a kill happens there, we know that 1 of the people in the island had to have done it, good odds of getting a wolf (1 in 3). If they decide not to kill to avoid detection, we neutralize a wolf and put pressure on the others. I haven't thought it through 100% so curious on people's thoughts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
SummerTheLynx said:
See, that's frustrating now, as wolves can set up. But I guess so can we. I have a thought and I want to see where people stand on it. What does everyone think about making one of the places a 4 person island. If a kill happens there, we know that 1 of the people in the island had to have done it, good odds of getting a wolf (1 in 3). If they decide not to kill to avoid detection, we neutralize a wolf and put pressure on the others. I haven't thought it through 100% so curious on people's thoughts.
Click to expand...

We wouldn't "know that 1 of the people in the island had to have done it." We'd be assuming it based on an assumption that wolves can only act on the planet they are on.

If that's the case, why would we not create two 4-person islands instead of just one, and lump the other 13 on the last planet?
 
LetItSnow said:
Sure, but then so do the villagers. Assuming we have a seer, they can seer anyone. Assuming we have a blocker, they can block anyone. Etc.

It turns it into a straightforward game. And straightforward is always better for villagers.
Click to expand...
I think groups work better. If we can get a trustworthy gatekeeper, just have them shut down all movement. Let the seer check everyone in their group, then lynch all the players in other groups.
 
LetItSnow said:
We wouldn't "know that 1 of the people in the island had to have done it." We'd be assuming it based on an assumption that wolves can only act on the planet they are on.

If that's the case, why would we not create two 4-person islands instead of just one, and lump the other 13 on the last planet?
Click to expand...
I was thinking of doing that as well, just wanted everyone's take on my first idea
 
genny said:
I think groups work better. If we can get a trustworthy gatekeeper, just have them shut down all movement. Let the seer check everyone in their group, then lynch all the players in other groups.
Click to expand...

*shrug* Or just lump everyone and move people OUT as they are verified villager.....

If STL's assumption is correct (and it stands to reason that it should be), then we'd be <creating> a bigger and bigger population of known and untouchable villagers as the game goes on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
genny said:
I think groups work better. If we can get a trustworthy gatekeeper, just have them shut down all movement. Let the seer check everyone in their group, then lynch all the players in other groups.
Click to expand...
Fwiw, lupin did say there are ways around the gatekeeper, so it won't be 100%. But ppl moving would be under suspicion
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
LetItSnow said:
*shrug* Or just lump everyone and move people OUT as they are verified villager.....

If STL's assumption is correct (and it stands to reason that it should be), then we'd be <creating> a bigger and bigger population of known and untouchable villagers as the game goes on.
Click to expand...

Comment on this, STL. You're the Super Spy. I'm the "nuke them all from orbit" marine.
 
LetItSnow said:
*shrug* Or just lump everyone and move people OUT as they are verified villager.....

If STL's assumption is correct (and it stands to reason that it should be), then we'd be <creating> a bigger and bigger population of known and untouchable villagers as the game goes on.
Click to expand...
I actually like this better. 1 4 person island and 1 island of verified villagers, and a bunch of unknowns in the other.
 
LetItSnow said:
*shrug* Or just lump everyone and move people OUT as they are verified villager.....

If STL's assumption is correct (and it stands to reason that it should be), then we'd be <creating> a bigger and bigger population of known and untouchable villagers as the game goes on.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but moving people out requires the seer to announce who's cleared.
 
LetItSnow said:
*shrug* Or just lump everyone and move people OUT as they are verified villager.....

If STL's assumption is correct (and it stands to reason that it should be), then we'd be <creating> a bigger and bigger population of known and untouchable villagers as the game goes on.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't the wolves kill that cleared villager?
 
Animal Midwife said:
Um, okay?
Click to expand...

I was referring to your "here we go" - I have no idea what that means or what it implies, so I lightheartedly said I have no idea what I'm doing to make sure you know that all of my comments aren't meant as malicious.
 
DVMDream said:
Yeah cause AM is one you have a soft spot for....what is it....every game that she's lynched and you're on it like white in rice with "going for the easy noob lynch"....

Or maybe the real issue is just me. You can't consider ever considering me for something for I dunno reasons you'll never admit to.
Click to expand...
Not because she's a noob. Because she's an easy lynch. LotF, Jilary, people who are regularly gone for hours and a time and the vote swings their way... I watch for those pushes, because I've watched good wolf packs jump on them. Early votes for you, or LIS, or any of the older players, and your vote is basically useless and not going to turn into a village lynch.

Hell, I started a lynch on AM on a similar principle when I was playing jdh's last game. Didn't want to bristle anyone in the lounge and threw my vote her way. Got her killed D1.
LetItSnow said:
Mostly for the game-breaking lulz, btw. @Trilt will get on board with it, right? For the lulz? :)
Click to expand...
That's not lulz, that's screwing with Lupes' design and would be a rather difficult thing to work into lore lol.
 
sheltermed said:
I was referring to your "here we go" - I have no idea what that means or what it implies, so I lightheartedly said I have no idea what I'm doing to make sure you know that all of my comments aren't meant as malicious.
Click to expand...

I know you're not malicious. It's just that I've just had snowball lynch effects in previous games.
 
SummerTheLynx said:
I actually like this better. 1 4 person island and 1 island of verified villagers, and a bunch of unknowns in the other.
Click to expand...

I think it is decent strategy but we all have to know that any wolf on that 4 person island is unlikely to make any move. Way too risky. Good idea in theory but not sure it'll narrow down suspects super quickly.
 
My thoughts here are that we can save money to get the villagers to the village island by buying protection items for them if they are available
DVMDream said:
I think it is decent strategy but we all have to know that any wolf on that 4 person island is unlikely to make any move. Way too risky. Good idea in theory but not sure it'll narrow down suspects super quickly.
Click to expand...
i don't think it will quickly, but it will essentially inactivate a wolf if it ends up on the island and thus put pressure on the other wolves. Thus tracking becomes a bit more effective. Or it will keep 4 villagers safe if there is none on said island. The question becomes how we determine the people that end up on said island
 
SummerTheLynx said:
But can people go though the gate tn? Because if they can then that sort of screws up the whole premise of the role, as it allows wolves to set up appropriately. I am hoping it's just a "nothing can happen" sort of night with respect to movement.
Click to expand...

genny said:
Yeah, but moving people out requires the seer to announce who's cleared.
Click to expand...

Animal Midwife said:
Wouldn't the wolves kill that cleared villager?
Click to expand...

Both of these sound like the toughest hurdles of the plan. Plus that whole, how do you talk consensus into the group when a bunch are gone already for the night?
 
LadyOtheFarm said:
Both of these sound like the toughest hurdles of the plan. Plus that whole, how do you talk consensus into the group when a bunch are gone already for the night?
Click to expand...
I meant to erase the first quote since it was answered. I can't remember, can we edit? I'll go look so I know for the next time I **** something up.
 
SummerTheLynx said:
It doesn't. Except I am not exactly sure things are going to work as you think they will. But let's see what comes up in that trading post tomorrow!
Click to expand...

If we're gonna try something major / game-changing like creating an island or two of four, we need to get that on track since tonight is the night to do it without cost.

I'm kinda doubtful we can get it organized, but....
 
So it seems like majority of people that are currently here are descartes. Should we have descartes all move to hatari, and as many people from chtulu (that check in) move to hatari to create the scenario. It won't be perfect, but it will be a start, and we can finish it off tomorrow?
 
I think we need to think a bit more before just randomly having people move all over.

It needs to be organized and orchestrated.

And really for this to work...the whole once a villager is clear move to another cleared villager island.....it really involves outing the seer. Do we actually want to do that?
 
DVMDream said:
I think we need to think a bit more before just randomly having people move all over.

It needs to be organized and orchestrated.

And really for this to work...the whole once a villager is clear move to another cleared villager island.....it really involves outing the seer. Do we actually want to do that?
Click to expand...
That's what I was saying. Is this plan fail proof enough to justify outing the seer?
 
I couldn't help reading the last few pages of posts in a whiny kid voice in my head.

So awesome we get another day of campaigning.

I wonder if the trading post will have hard liquor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
I don't know if we'll be able to depend on items as the fix to STL's plan for getting those that are cleared to the village island. Items are RNG as to which trading post they are at and first come first serve. It would also expose our seer so I don't know if it is worth it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

SportPonies
Fire Emblem: Three HoWWses Game Thread
114 115 116 117 118
Replies
6K
Views
62K
Lawpy
Lawpy
kaydubs
Melee WW Game Thread-April 2024
27 28 29 30 31
Replies
2K
Views
9K
samac
samac
kaydubs
WWhat Theme? Game Thread
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
603
Views
22K
samac
samac
kaydubs
Lucky 7777777 WW Game Thread-Non Champs April 2024
2 3 4
Replies
152
Views
825
Zenge142
Zenge142
Zenge142
MaWWke YoWWr OWWn WW - Game Thread
152 153 154 155 156
Replies
8K
Views
156K
supershorty
supershorty
Top