I kind of feel the opposite. I think the U is one of the easiest state schools to get into (if you are from Utah or Idaho). Their MCAT scores are well below the national average and the diversity at the school is a joke (everyone is a white male from Utah). I'm OOS (from a state without a medical school - not Idaho - and no agreements with other state schools), low 30s MCAT, 3.6 GPA from an Ivy League school - lots of leadership experience (captain of teams) and research. I live and work at the U and got rejected on Saturday. I kind of expected it because of my OOS status. I get kind of pissed when people (from Utah or Idaho) on this forum talk about how hard the U is to get into. At least you have a school with some affiliation. Try applying to a bunch of schools as an OOS applicant - it is much more difficult.
It's not necessarily that the U is hard to get into, but rather, it's the fact that there doesn't seem to be much rhyme or reason to the people that get accepted, more of a crap shoot than anything. I'm IS, high 30s MCAT, 3.95 GPA, well above "average" on research, volunteer work, clinical stuff, shadowing, leadership, blah blah etc...and I'm a
white male. I got an early rejection in January - I guess they really didn't want me. Diversity is "lacking" at the U, because most of the applicants aren't "diverse."
I wouldn't say that I've had an amazing application cycle this year, but I am fortunate to have acceptances to schools that many would consider to be better schools than Utah (I realize that "better" is extremely arbitrary and subjective). And while not accepted, I've interviewed and been waitlisted at different Ivy Leagues, which I feel is an accomplishment.
The point being - I don't think I was a bad applicant at all, I was well above standards set by the U, and they rejected me months ago. There are also students on SDN who are applying their 2nd and 3rd times, and even after doing what the Dean told them to improve, they aren't even put on a waitlist (btw, I sure hope you get in somewhere, and don't let the U discourage you!). Without being demeaning of the current students at the U, I know of someone who had mediocre stats, but his hobby just happened to be the favorite hobby of the person interviewing him. The ENTIRE interview, they talked about that hobby. He got accepted. I'm sure the interviewer could see his personality and find out what he was like no matter what they were talking about, but it might cause some to raise an eyebrow or two. There really isn't much of a way to know how "competitive" you are at the U. Just hope you get an interviewer that likes you
🙂 Anyway, no hard feelings against the U, I'm really happy to be going where I am, I just feel horribly that people keep getting the run-around when they go above what the Dean tells them they need to do to be more competitive.
As a side note, I think they should get all the applicants in on one day (that meet their ridiculously low minimum requirements), and the top 100 (or 80) blackjack players get an acceptance. At least then people would know WHY those that get in and those that get rejected do.