So I had a question for those who are in the know on this board. I was curious about what UW looks for in an OOS candidate?
Wisconsin's Laws are confusing about whether your spouse would count as IS (some info
here and
here). This is something you will want to clarify with the admissions people, since normally OOS students are considered OOS for all 4 years if the only reason they moved to the state is for school.
The tl;dr version to your question: there is no one size fits all formula to land an II, or even an acceptance at our school. However, I do genuinely believe UWSMPH is one of the most holistic schools out there in how they select folks.
The many components we look at - you can find this on our website as well.
1) Academics - ONLY ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE!
2) Background - SES, your "life story," first gen, or any significant factors such as having to work, supporting a family, non-tradition, URM, other relevant factors such as experience in PH, MPH, working with underserved.
3) What makes you unique compared to the 5000+ other applicants we have to look at.
4) PS/Secondary Essays - ESPECIALLY if you're out of state!
5)
And this one might to mention for you - special ties to WI. Having a special reason for wanting to come here (and not just shot gun applying to every school) is taken into account as well.
------
I know this post will be hard to read for the folks who have been alternate listed/pre-II/post-II rejected, especially since nobody wants to believe that there are any flaws/reasons they were not selected in their application. However, realistically speaking, it is very difficult to get accepted here as a non-resident, and the total acceptance rate is somewhere around 2% (Interview 180/5500, accept about half from that). Even if you had a solid application, but for whatever reason got rejected here, it does not reflect on your qualities or whether or not you are qualified for other schools. We are limited in the number of seats we can provide to the OOS pool, so we have to go the extra distance to find those "unique" applicants.
Thus, it's misleading to look at applicants who have amazing stats and freak out/worry about yourself - it isn't the whole picture. People get rejected for a variety of reasons, from IAs [you can imagine we have seen everything], Poor letters of recommendation, terrible essays, red flags that come up in the interviews, lack of clinical exposure... the list could literally go on. And these happen a lot more often than applicants may think, or even be aware of. Make your application the best you can make it, apply early, and put a lot of time into your essays/secondaries, and your chances will be the best they can be, as with any school
🙂