That's pretty much not it at all - lack of rural physicians isn't due to shortage in spots, it's largely based on most people choosing to speicailize/sub-specialize, and the economics around primary care in undersevered. There is currently zero incentive and huge discentives to do rural care unless you really want to do it - ****tier hours, less resources, less time with patients because of fee for service based models, lower compensation, I could go on and on (I work for a hospital with rural clinics and a large indigent population - and part of my job is financial reporting/auditing/anaylysis, working for our CFO, and my wife is a charge master)...I've also had this discussion with our chief medical officer who's a practicing rural DO who also lead physician recruitment while I was shadowing and preparing for interviews. That was a big part of ACA was to help try to incentivize primary care using increases in reimubrsement in Medicare/medicaid for those fields
And match stats show family med have one of the lower fill rates (still at 95, but most specialities are 99-100.
http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2015_final.pdf
And to your last point, AAMC itself released a report a few years ago "New Report Shows Medical Student Debt Not the Determining Factor in Specialty Choice"
I assume you're talking about PNWU? Because if you are, your point gets even murkier now the WSU has a school and additional 3rd/4th year rotations. Honestly, neither of them should effect UW's rotations all that much.
Sent from my iPad using
SDN mobile