- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 7
Last edited:
This is true. Yale is great but definitely not for everyone. There are measures in place to make sure you don't fall behind but it is definitely not for you if you aren't intrinsically motivated to learn.Personally, Duke because of the 1 year curriculum. Yale would be a gamble if you are not a self-motivated person who keeps on top of things.
I also want to defer a year from starting medical school to travel, teach (to make money), read, do a global health policy or public health internship, and do healthcare investigative journalism in remote areas of the world.
I think wherever you choose to go, you will need to learn a bit of humility in order to succeed. First of all, almost all med students in all of those schools are gonna be very motivated (that is not to say that they have a super clear vision of what they want to do in the future, but I think an argument can be made that those at higher tier schools/schools with more prestige tend to have even more ambiguous visions of their futures). Also, don't assume you'd be a big shot at UW; you'd just be an MS1, like all other MS1's. Also, why are you talking about average stats on this thread? The only purpose of stats are to determine that you are prepared enough for medical school. Once you're in, everybody is equally unprepared! Are you gonna be the type of med student to ask classmates what they got on their MCATs?
I think wherever you choose to go, you will need to learn a bit of humility in order to succeed. First of all, almost all med students in all of those schools are gonna be very motivated (that is not to say that they have a super clear vision of what they want to do in the future, but I think an argument can be made that those at higher tier schools/schools with more prestige tend to have even more ambiguous visions of their futures). Also, don't assume you'd be a big shot at UW; you'd just be an MS1, like all other MS1's. Also, why are you talking about average stats on this thread? The only purpose of stats are to determine that you are prepared enough for medical school. Once you're in, everybody is equally unprepared! Are you gonna be the type of med student to ask classmates what they got on their MCATs?
This is a much kinder way of putting what I was about to say.
Thank you for your response.
What I meant was, at other schools, the students seemed to want to become clinicians plus, meaning they wanted to be a clinician, but also involved in other endeavors such as policy making, environmental health, etc. I have a feeling that there is less of this culture and less ambition to "become leaders and pioneers of medicine" at UW than the other schools. I don't think that it's unfair to say that the peers that you're surrounded by have a huge impact on your future and path.
Thank you for your response.
What I meant was, at other schools, the students seemed to want to become clinicians plus, meaning they wanted to be a clinician, but also involved in other endeavors such as policy making, environmental health, etc. I have a feeling that there is less of this culture and less ambition to "become leaders and pioneers of medicine" at UW than the other schools. I don't think that it's unfair to say that the peers that you're surrounded by have a huge impact on your future and path.
This is completely fine and a very valid point! Problems only arise when you start citing GPAs and mcats to insult the "quality" of the student body. Thanks for clarifying what you meant.