- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 0
So... I'm still a bit confused on this bit. It's not REALLY double spots right? Since half are supposedly still reserved for Riverside students. So, if 200 Riverside students apply, they are fighting for 24 spots, and the 2500 other applicants are pretty much fighting for the other 26. At least, that is what it seems like people have been saying. Confusing...![]()
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on which side you're on), you are correct with the numbers. It is good news for those applying from UCR (statistically) but makes the odds very low for anyone applying outside of UCR.
Now for a word of caution for you guys. I applied to UCR twice back when it was still the UCR/UCLA program, interviewed the first time, and was rejected pre-interview the second time. Please take the following with a grain of salt, especially if you're not particularly interested in pursuing primary care. These are just my opinions and how I look at the situation.
From a UCR standpoint, the maintained "good" odds of 200 applying for 24 can still be seen as a loss because now you lose the previous route to graduating from UCLA and using all of UCLA's resources to get you into a field other than primary care. At least in their first few years as a stand-alone school, UCR will pool all its resources to making sure everyone goes into primary care by training you guys in community health centers rather than a teaching hospital. It got most of its funding from the surrounding community which expects physicians to be poured back into primary care later on. So unless you want to go into primary care in the Inland Empire (with UCR's new plan), UCR might not be the best choice for you. This has nothing to do with the facilities; they're top notch. This has more to do with their mission statement and how serious they are about it.
I'm sure I am not alone in this disgruntlement; I am sure many undergrads who came to UCR did so with the hope of getting into the UCR/UCLA program, as I did. I turned down an undergrad acceptance to UCLA in favor of UCR for this reason.
The following (which some friends and I found to be alarming) is an excerpt from a recent article in the UCR Magazine: "If the students embrace fields like family medicine and pediatrics, and truly connect with residents of Riverside and San Bernardino counties, [Founding Dean] Olds and the founding faculty could be seen as visionaries. But if those same students end up practicing orthopedics, cardiology and plastic surgery in Newport Beach and San Diego, the school could be seen as a failure, Olds said."
So basically, if they graduate physicians who don't stay in the Inland Empire doing Primary Care, they will have "failed." How does that make you feel if you were interested in something else?
Clearly, the school's mission is extreme (which is good for them, if they are serious about their goal of addressing the primary care shortage in the IE). If any of you are interested in any specialties outside of primary care, especially competitive ones such as those they mentioned, take extra caution towards matriculating at UCR. If you end up going here, you will probably feel afraid to tell faculty your interests in specialties because you know they will hold a grudge against you. To them, you are making the school "fail" in its mission. For research opportunities, you will probably struggle to find faculty supportive of your goals, etc.
I am very happy, in retrospect, that they recognized during my interviews that I was not a good fit for their institution. As a result, I am now at a school that does embrace any and every field that students are interested in, and I have had many mentors guide me towards pursuing dermatology or plastic surgery. So if any of you have acceptances to places that are more welcoming to all interests, I implore you to explore them further, rather than grappling onto the attractive option of staying in Cali with a cheaper tuition. Of course, if this is your only acceptance, by all means, take it! To read the article in question, you can go to http://magazine.ucr.edu/2013/winter/ and it starts at page 10. I'm not trying to derail the school; I applaud it for making its intentions clear. If anything, my rant might help them produce more primary care physicians in the IE as a result of some of you dropping out, if your goals are anything like mine. Thanks for reading. I don't know why I decided to type all this out, but I hope it was useful. I encourage you guys to do more research on the subject so that you don't just get a one sided view (a.k.a. my view) on the whole thing.