- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
- Messages
- 3,564
- Reaction score
- 7,296
No sir!Did anyone who was accepted ever receive anything in the mail?
No sir!Did anyone who was accepted ever receive anything in the mail?
Sent a checking in email and received the following:
"It will probably be another week before we have a decision for you. we apologize for the delay."
I get the feeling this means I will be receiving my pre-II rejection next week?
It's just the word decision...seems so finalStop being so hard on yourself
When did you submit?Sent a checking in email and received the following:
"It will probably be another week before we have a decision for you. we apologize for the delay."
I get the feeling this means I will be receiving my pre-II rejection next week?
Early august. Been complete for awhile now. IS, Lizzy 67-68When did you submit?
Oh dang. We are twins.Early august. Been complete for awhile now. IS, Lizzy 67-68
pre II rejection, super disappointed considering I interviewed last year and was waitlisted
I wouldn't count it out yet. Also, looks like we applied to all the same schools yaypudding.It's just the word decision...seems so final
II today! LM 69, OOS, ORM
Congrats!! When were you complete?? I have similar stats, OOS, and ORM as well
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Congrats! when you interviewed, did they say you would hear back in early Jan or did you hear back earlier than what they told you at interview day?Accepted yesterday.
LizzyM ~70, IS, interviewed early December.
They stated that it would approximately be one month. In view of the holidays, I'd consider them early.Congrats! when you interviewed, did they say you would hear back in early Jan or did you hear back earlier than what they told you at interview day?
I could be wrong, but only if you're interviewed or accepted. You cannot update prior to your interview or the timing between your interview and decision.hey guys! first time poster here...do we have to update with our new grades or is that optional? my semester grades were a bit (.1) lower than my cumulative gpa so i didnt think it would help
awesome thank you for the thorough reply! I am in the interviewed to decision spot right now and i remember them saying no updates but something about grades if we received them quickly or something...better be safe and not do anything i guess hahaI could be wrong, but only if you're interviewed or accepted. You cannot update prior to your interview or the timing between your interview and decision.
So:
Apply to interview = no updates are accepted
To sign up for the interview itself = updates (in essay format) are accepted
Interviewed to decision = no updates are accepted
Acceptance to matriculation = while it's not necessarily an update, you'll have to send your most recent transcripts
I could be wrong, but only if you're interviewed or accepted. You cannot update prior to your interview or the timing between your interview and decision.
So:
Apply to interview = no updates are accepted
To sign up for the interview itself = updates (in essay format) are accepted
Interviewed to decision = no updates are accepted
Acceptance to matriculation = while it's not necessarily an update, you'll have to send your most recent transcripts
sorry to ask again but are these grade updates required? if i dont send them, will it hurt my chances?Can confirm this pretty much sums up what they told us at the interview today.
Edit: Just wanted to make a small correction, they said that they do takes grade updates in the form of unofficial transcripts post interview/pre acceptance. But no other form of updates are accepted.
sorry to ask again but are these grade updates required? if i dont send them, will it hurt my chances?
EDIT: I am post interview awaiting decision
.Nope. Optional. Though it'll be taken into consideration during review.
Rejected just now. Complete mid August.
Glad to see I wasn't the only one who thought that!Pre-II rejection. I thought their rejection email was the most condescending, paternalistic one I've received so far.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
I didn't even read the stupid thing, lol. I did appreciate that 'no interview' was very clear in the subject line so that was all I needed.Pre-II rejection. I thought their rejection email was the most condescending, paternalistic one I've received so far.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
I didn't even read the stupid thing, lol. I did appreciate that 'no interview' was very clear in the subject line so that was all I needed.
Could you post the contents of the letter? Curious to see if it's worst than Rochesters.
Sorry to hear that....what was so bad about it?I didn't even read the stupid thing, lol. I did appreciate that 'no interview' was very clear in the subject line so that was all I needed.
Rochester's was brutal."Dear Mr. Pudding,
You're awesome and we know it and this is tough...but we've decided not to bother you with an interview and allow you to matriculate elsewhere. Sorry for the inconvenience."
I actually hesitate to in case the thread is monitored. It was marked confidential (I'm looking at you, Hillary) but I was also rejected by Rochester and they're similar generic piss off letters.
"Dear Mr. Pudding,
You're awesome and we know it and this is tough...but we've decided not to bother you with an interview and allow you to matriculate elsewhere. Sorry for the inconvenience."
I actually hesitate to in case the thread is monitored. It was marked confidential (I'm looking at you, Hillary) but I was also rejected by Rochester and they're similar generic piss off letters.
Lol you forgot the "We're going to assume that you will be a reapplicant because you didn't get an interview from us. Here are some resources for you to fix your application, but really it's just generic information that is of no use. It's really us telling you not to bother us anymore."
haha I'm sure they weren't purposely being condescending, but it could be revised to be a little more empathetic. Someone receiving such a letter would no doubt be very bitter and salty about the whole application experience.
from what i remember from interview day, im pretty sure they look at the whole application + the MMI (idk how the weighting works) and then give every applicant a total scoreWhen they make decisions on who they're accepting, do they make a re-review of the apps holistically and focus on stats/EC's and all that? Or is it that once someone is interviewed the stats/Ec's/PS/Recs are good enough so they mainly factor in MMI performance. If someone has low stats but did very well on the MMI, might they not accept him because his stats are low? (But if that's the case why would they have even bothered sending him/her an II and wasting the time and money when they deny many "more qualified" applicants?)
Can someone take one for the team and post the contents of the rejection email? I'm so curious
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile