2017-2018 University of Wisconsin

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Do you think that they would consider this or a 506, as their median mcat is 512? ( i think)
I am an OOS URM, but only have one state school

Hi, admitted M1 here. This past cycle my friend wasn't offered an interview from UWSMPH and was able to have an appointment in which he was provided reasoning for his rejection and suggestions for the future cycle. The reason the school gave was that his MCAT was low (506), but that the rest of his app was strong. Specifically, he didn't do well on CARS, so I suppose section scores are important to consider.
 
Hi, admitted M1 here. This past cycle my friend wasn't offered an interview from UWSMPH and was able to have an appointment in which he was provided reasoning for his rejection and suggestions for the future cycle. The reason the school gave was that his MCAT was low (506), but that the rest of his app was strong. Specifically, he didn't do well on CARS, so I suppose section scores are important to consider.

Was your friend IS or OOS? This has me concerned because I'm in-state with a 505 MCAT (124 CARS).
 
Was your friend IS or OOS? This has me concerned because I'm in-state with a 505 MCAT (124 CARS).

He was an IS applicant. Idk if it matters, but he was applying out of college (so was I). Seems like most people have been out of school for a year or two at least when I went to second visit day.
 
do you think it's important/necessary to discuss my reasons for wanting to attend UW SMPH in the essay if I'm OOS? I've spent most of my space mentioning important aspects of my background and have very little space left...

I'm a current M1 and was an OOS applicant. In my opinion, I think it's really important based on some of the questions I was asked in the faculty interview and student panel interview. I used the second half of "the essay" to justify why I was applying to UWSMPH and this section was brought up in my faculty interview. Just be honest and reflect why you want to attend UWSMPH over a different school, or even different program.
 
Current M3 checking in. I can't answer questions about the new curriculum (our class is the last of the "legacy" curriculum), but I'll do my best to answer any questions you may have about the school itself or the admissions process. Good luck everyone!
 
My residency status still does not have a green check next to it. I submitted two weeks ago, should I be concerned. It says that my residency status has been determined to be nonresident, so I am not sure why this is still red.
 
My residency status still does not have a green check next to it. I submitted two weeks ago, should I be concerned. It says that my residency status has been determined to be nonresident, so I am not sure why this is still red.

I'm OOS, but I believe that I read per their requirements that they don't verify residency until 365 days before the first day of classes or something of the sort (it was like 8/21 or something). But I'm sure that wouldn't affect your IS vs OOS status for application purposes, likely just financial aid reasons.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Any chance for me with GPA 3.7 MCAT 505 OOS
 
got the e-mail that my application was marked complete yesterday! hoping for an II 🙂
 
Hello, current M4 (OOS with no ties) checking in! This is a question we get every year. Minimums exist to facilitate the process of sifting through 5000+ applications, but there are always rare exceptions. Furthermore, despite the extremely low OOS applicant:interview ratio, it is not because of one variable or factor. I still consider our review process to be one of the most holistic among med schools - we take into account everything from the applicant's background, individual accomplishment, academic and non-academic strengths, and other qualities that make you stand out among the thousands hoping for a shot at our school.

Don't listen to what others may say - GPA and MCAT isn't everything. Our median stats could easily be higher, but we don't need to fill a class with all 4.0/515 Mcats. We care more about finding potential leaders in the field of medicine and/Or public health who possess qualities that would enhance the incoming class and positively impact the med school/surrounding community.

Bit of advice for those applying this cycle: take your secondary seriously and put some thought into it - it's your one chance to tell us why UWSMPH even if you don't have any ties.

Good luck to everyone!


Thanks for the insight, Jennyfishy! Can you comment on the Letter's of Rec requirement... it looks like they require a committee letter, packet, or a letter from 3 "faculty members." I'm a non-trad applicant, and currently have two recs from faculty- one from undergrad (UW-Madison) and one from grad school, as well as two letters from current employers (EMT and other medical-related) and one from an MD. Do i really need that third letter from a faculty, especially given your earlier comment about holistic review (or am I misinterpreting that). Sorry for the super specific question on the public thread, but figured I may not be the only one in this situation. Happy to talk on a PM too.
 
Any chance for me with GPA 3.7 MCAT 505 OOS

Depends on your EC's, but a 505 is just above their cutoff of a 503. Also it is significantly harder OOS since it is a state school. But there is no harm in trying! Well, besides $75.
 
Thanks for the insight, Jennyfishy! Can you comment on the Letter's of Rec requirement... it looks like they require a committee letter, packet, or a letter from 3 "faculty members." I'm a non-trad applicant, and currently have two recs from faculty- one from undergrad (UW-Madison) and one from grad school, as well as two letters from current employers (EMT and other medical-related) and one from an MD. Do i really need that third letter from a faculty, especially given your earlier comment about holistic review (or am I misinterpreting that). Sorry for the super specific question on the public thread, but figured I may not be the only one in this situation. Happy to talk on a PM too.
As per the website, you can fulfill the letter of recommendation requirement in one of 3 ways:
"
  • One committee letter and one individual letter from a nonacademic source (someone other than a faculty or family member or personal friend) or

  • One letter packet: This packet should include letters from three faculty members and a letter from a nonacademic source (someone other than a faculty or family member or personal friend) or

  • Four individual letters: Three academic letters of recommendation from faculty members and a fourth nonacademic letter from someone other than a faculty or family member or personal friend. Note: Academic letters may be from science and/or nonscience faculty members in any combination"
Given that it details it very specifically, it would be in your best interest to follow this to not only prove you have read the website/can follow directions, but also that you have made meaningful connections with professors/faculty members who can attest to your scholarly and academic preparedness. Holistic means the entire application is taken into consideration to view what strengths and assets the individual brings to the potential class, not that exceptions are made to general rule of thumb.

That being said, if there are absolute extenuating circumstances that would prohibit you from reconnecting with a more recent faculty member (such as from your grad classes), your question may best be answered by the admissions office staff, who would have the final say on that. Best of luck!
 
Tennessee. Probably couldn't make a strong enough argument for why I was interested in Wisconsin.
 
Tennessee. Probably couldn't make a strong enough argument for why I was interested in Wisconsin.
Yeah don't feel too bad. I know it sucks, but that is probably the reason why since this school is very in-state (or at least Midwest oriented). With a LizzyM that high, you're bound to get in other places! Good luck 🙂
 
MN Applicant (OOS) with LizzyM of 83.5 (528 MCAT) rejected 8/7. I submitted the secondary 7/14. Really bummed as this was one of my top 3 schools but I wish the rest of you all the best! Keep crushing those secondaries/interviews peeps and we'll all find our fit! (hopefully)
 
MN Applicant (OOS) with LizzyM of 83.5 (528 MCAT) rejected 8/7. I submitted the secondary 7/14. Really bummed as this was one of my top 3 schools but I wish the rest of you all the best! Keep crushing those secondaries/interviews peeps and we'll all find our fit! (hopefully)
Lmao these trolls keep evolving
 
Hey all, longtime reader, first-time poster here.

I graduated from UWSMPH this past year and I wanted to share my experience with you all applying.

First, let me qualify this by saying I am glad that I picked this medical school, if only because staying in-state saved me a ton of money on tuition.
However, I definitely would NOT recommend it to anyone coming from OOS. It is a toxic learning environment. During the preclinical years, most of your professors will be more interested in promoting their own research rather than actually teaching you what you need to know to take care of patients. When you get into the wards, you'll find that the vast majority of residents are uninterested in teaching because they're overworked and generally treated poorly by the attendings at UW Hospital. After rotating at different institutions during my 4th year, I can definitively say that my education was lacking and the students I worked alongside who went to "less prestigious" med schools had received superior clinical training. Even now as a resident, the students at the school affiliated with my residency program (which I won't name because the administration at UW is definitely petty enough to track me down) are treated much better and get far more one-on-one clinical teaching than I did at Wisconsin (partly due to the sheer number of students and residents). Perhaps some of these issues will improve with the new curriculum, but I doubt the malignant culture is going to change much in the near future.

tl;dr: don't go to school here if you can avoid it, your training will be lacking and you will regret it as a resident

Best of luck with your apps
 
Hey all, longtime reader, first-time poster here.

I graduated from UWSMPH this past year and I wanted to share my experience with you all applying.

First, let me qualify this by saying I am glad that I picked this medical school, if only because staying in-state saved me a ton of money on tuition.
However, I definitely would NOT recommend it to anyone coming from OOS. It is a toxic learning environment. During the preclinical years, most of your professors will be more interested in promoting their own research rather than actually teaching you what you need to know to take care of patients. When you get into the wards, you'll find that the vast majority of residents are uninterested in teaching because they're overworked and generally treated poorly by the attendings at UW Hospital. After rotating at different institutions during my 4th year, I can definitively say that my education was lacking and the students I worked alongside who went to "less prestigious" med schools had received superior clinical training. Even now as a resident, the students at the school affiliated with my residency program (which I won't name because the administration at UW is definitely petty enough to track me down) are treated much better and get far more one-on-one clinical teaching than I did at Wisconsin (partly due to the sheer number of students and residents). Perhaps some of these issues will improve with the new curriculum, but I doubt the malignant culture is going to change much in the near future.

tl;dr: don't go to school here if you can avoid it, your training will be lacking and you will regret it as a resident

Best of luck with your apps

Game changer 🙁 does that seem to be the general consensus among your classmates?
 
Hey all, longtime reader, first-time poster here.

I graduated from UWSMPH this past year and I wanted to share my experience with you all applying.

First, let me qualify this by saying I am glad that I picked this medical school, if only because staying in-state saved me a ton of money on tuition.
However, I definitely would NOT recommend it to anyone coming from OOS. It is a toxic learning environment. During the preclinical years, most of your professors will be more interested in promoting their own research rather than actually teaching you what you need to know to take care of patients. When you get into the wards, you'll find that the vast majority of residents are uninterested in teaching because they're overworked and generally treated poorly by the attendings at UW Hospital. After rotating at different institutions during my 4th year, I can definitively say that my education was lacking and the students I worked alongside who went to "less prestigious" med schools had received superior clinical training. Even now as a resident, the students at the school affiliated with my residency program (which I won't name because the administration at UW is definitely petty enough to track me down) are treated much better and get far more one-on-one clinical teaching than I did at Wisconsin (partly due to the sheer number of students and residents). Perhaps some of these issues will improve with the new curriculum, but I doubt the malignant culture is going to change much in the near future.

tl;dr: don't go to school here if you can avoid it, your training will be lacking and you will regret it as a resident

Best of luck with your apps
 
Last edited:
I don't know if I can say that a majority of my classmates felt exactly the same way, but I've heard all of the criticisms I listed above voiced by many of them over the years. As for the toxic learning environment, after rotating at a number of other institutions in the Midwest, the trend seems to be that residents are less happy and attendings have bigger egos at UW Hospital. Also, students get much, much more autonomy and hands-on experience in hospitals and clinics the further you get from Madison. Don't get me wrong, I still felt prepared to enter residency after 4 years at UW, I just felt like I would've been better prepared at a different institution.

However, if you're really interested in making research a big part of your career, there aren't many better schools in the country. And obviously if you're a Wisconsin resident there's a huge financial advantage to staying home.

Also, about a quarter of my medical school class (not counting dual degrees like MD/PhD or MD/MPH) did not graduate in four years, mostly due to failing a class or a rotation. I strongly suspect this isn't unique to UW, but nobody really tells you that when you're applying to med school, and frankly I think that's a bit dishonest. You deserve to know what you're signing up for.

I'd like to share more specifics, but I used to be involved in admissions, and they straight-up told me that they monitor these forums. I've probably already angered them quite a bit.
 
I don't know if I can say that a majority of my classmates felt exactly the same way, but I've heard all of the criticisms I listed above voiced by many of them over the years. As for the toxic learning environment, after rotating at a number of other institutions in the Midwest, the trend seems to be that residents are less happy and attendings have bigger egos at UW Hospital. Also, students get much, much more autonomy and hands-on experience in hospitals and clinics the further you get from Madison. Don't get me wrong, I still felt prepared to enter residency after 4 years at UW, I just felt like I would've been better prepared at a different institution.

However, if you're really interested in making research a big part of your career, there aren't many better schools in the country. And obviously if you're a Wisconsin resident there's a huge financial advantage to staying home.

Also, about a quarter of my medical school class (not counting dual degrees like MD/PhD or MD/MPH) did not graduate in four years, mostly due to failing a class or a rotation. I strongly suspect this isn't unique to UW, but nobody really tells you that when you're applying to med school, and frankly I think that's a bit dishonest. You deserve to know what you're signing up for.

I'd like to share more specifics, but I used to be involved in admissions, and they straight-up told me that they monitor these forums. I've probably already angered them quite a bit.
Not sure I would put to much faith in this person's posts. The account was created on Friday and immediately posted to this thread. No other activity but on this thread as well. This has troll written all over it.
 
I wouldn't call troll just yet. I also graduated from UWSMPH recently and can share some of those sentiments. I think it's an extreme opinion, but I strongly believe that it is an accurate representation of someone's experience at this school.

I would say that some specialities are more toxic than others, especially Surgery and OB/Gyn. My Internal Medicine experience was great, but I know many of my classmates had a very different experience. Many residents are not interested in teaching, but there are also some wonderful resident teachers. Same goes for attendings. It's a little bit luck of the draw and a bit of your own attitude. That being said, I also rotated at other mid-west programs that were comparable to UW, and I did not feel clinically deficient nor did my evaluators feel that I was. I'm doing well in residency.

You shouldn't take anything we say about our pre-clinical experience with more than a grain of salt because the curriculum is different. The only thing I thought was taught poorly was Neuroanatomy in first year and parts of GI in second year. That being said, it seemed like the second years (now third years) that I worked with during their cardiovascular unit and in Step 1 study groups thought their integrated curriculum was disorganized and poorly taught. This is the "old curriculum." The first years (now second years) I have talked with, who were the first with the "new curriculum," have had very similar frustrations with poor organization and teaching. I suspect it was amplified by the curriculum's new format.

Much more than anything, I think the grading system is not the best for promoting mental health. The percentiles thing that they started with the current fourths years sounds incredibly stressful, as every single, little point matters in each class. It was bad enough when I was in second year and a 92% in Neurosciences got you a B, I can't imagine getting that score and now being told you were 34th percentile. The current dean is immovable on the grading process. It will not change as long as he is dean (which I believe will be for sometime). You have be resilient to make it through here because of the grading system.

I personally did not have the best time at UWSMPH, but due to cost I wouldn't change my choice in medical schools. Many, many people truly enjoyed their time at UWSMPH, including OOS students. I don't think there is a great way to know if you are going to be happy a certain medical school over another. At lot of it depends on factors that you can't control or predict, especially your classmates.
 
Rejected today. Complete 8/2, OOS, LizzyM 77. I'm a little surprised I guess, but I don't have any ties to Wisconsin so I guess I really shouldn't be. Good luck to the rest of y'all.
 
Also rejected today. From Michigan, LizzyM 78. I thought I gave a convincing Why Wisconsin answer, but I guess not good enough 😉. There is a very strong IS preference. Good luck to the rest of you!!
 
A couple thoughts/my 2 cents as an OOS M4 entering the match/graduating this year..

1) No med school is perfect, and there are definitely students scattered across the spectrum – from the die-hard Badgers who will absolutely rank UW their #1 if they interview here for residency, to those who absolutely hated their experience here. The reasons are far more complex than can be teased out on an anonymous forum.

2) 25% of the class failing is 44 students out of a class of 176. That’s totally an exaggeration. In total, there ends up being maybe 1-10 each year (e.g. 5 from my class stayed behind the first year, 5 joined, then we lost another 7, then 15 joined between all the MPH/PHD/other students). Some students who “failed” ended up repeating a few classes, or splitting some part of their 4 years for a myriad of reasons. That’s still less than 10%. Also, grades/academic performance is one piece of the puzzle. In my class, quite a few were because they wanted to take time off to raise a baby. Some had some pretty significant family issues that came up (also affecting grades/performance – because hey, who can study when your mom passed away?). The school has tried to analyze data over the years to see if there are factors that could predict student success/difficulty in an attempt to intervene sooner – there’s really no clear correlation in GPA/MCAT prior to med school on success in med school because how much more complicated it is. The rest of your life doesn’t magically stop just because you’re in med school, even if the pace of the teaching/material doesn’t ever slow down. I somehow doubt that this is unique to our med school, and I don’t imagine many schools having a reason to advertise that. Our match rates are otherwise still consistently solid across all specialties.

3) Re Clerkship/Wards: I did half of my clerkships at UW and half at community hospitals/hospitals around Madison and in Milwaukee. You will run into residents and attendings/docs who are more enthusiastic/better at teaching/working with med students everywhere. In my own experience, I felt like my UW experiences (Did half of the entire Psych, Neuro, Surg, Peds clerkships at UW, half at other hospitals in Madison) were good, but there is far less “1:1” time given how much larger the teams are – instead of being the only med student with 1 attending, you are 1-3 med students with 1-3 residents with 1 attending + any other specialties who were consulted/involved in the care of the patient. That’s pretty typical given academic centers tend to house more complex patients in the first place.

By comparison, my community hospital patients were often more “bread and butter,” but I was also pretty much the only student on site, so I had direct patient care/face time with an attending or 1 senior resident SPECIFICALLY for teaching almost every day. My experiences in Milwaukee have been just as similar – I feel pretty comfortable being able to carry out the basic responsibilities of an M4, and have a pretty good handle of what to expect in residency (although who knows, I anticipate a huge learning curve regardless). A more concrete example may be at UW, I was basically retractor duty and sometimes sewed up teeny port holes in the OR because there were always residents with the attendings, but I had friends in LaCrosse who were often the only ones with the surgeons and were basically assisting in the OR, doing opening incisions, closing, and all-around much more involved in the OR.

4) I, myself, have a decent number of critiques on where I feel our school could still improve, and have been part of a bunch of direct meetings with administration because of it, and they have become much more open to acknowledging their own blind spots over the years. I think some of my classmates have been toxic, but for the most part, they make up the minority, and the administration and faculty folks I’ve met have been incredibly open to the feedback and casual conversation in passing (shy of maybe 1 or 2 buzzkills I avoid like the plaque).

5) Did I enjoy med school? Yes, but definitely a lot more after I survived the first two years and had more say in making sure my clinical experiences were exactly what I wanted them to be. Are there things I wish would’ve changed about medical school? Yes, like I’m sure everyone else at every other med school in the country does. Do I think I would be happier at one of my other choices? The grass is always greener on the other side, and it’s easy to say something when you’re on the outside, seeing only the traits that you feel your own experiences are lacking.

6) So what does all this back and forth nonsense/counter arguments mean? Not much. It’s 1 person’s 2 cents vs another’s 2 cents. You all, once you are medical students, are responsible for tailoring your own medical school education to what you want it to be. You can fly under the radar and do the basics you need to just get by. You can gun/sabotage your peers and make yourself public enemy #1. You can rally up a group to try to be part of system-wide change within the medical school. You can seek out specific mentors/providers on your clerkship who will offer the teaching/training that is specific to your own career interests. However, nobody is going to do it for you, especially if you don’t make it known to others who could help make your own goals a reality.
 
I know they say that there will be repetition in the Activities sections between the primary app and secondary app...
Is it actually okay to copy and paste or will this be looked down upon? Several of my activities are no longer current since I graduated so there really is not much else to talk about.
 
Top