For ppl with IIs did you get an email or was it through portal?
it was via email and an interview tab poped up in portalFor ppl with IIs did you get an email or was it through portal?
It's one school. You get one interview. As you might recall, you rank the campuses and are considered for any campus you ranked, and could very well be interviewed by one and accepted by another.Do you only get IIs from one?
Or is it possible to get two
wait lol sorry but this confused me, you said "you get one interview" but you could be "interviewed by one and (preumably interviewed separately and) accepted by another," so which is it?It's one school. You get one interview. As you might recall, you rank the campuses and are considered for any campus you ranked, and could very well be interviewed by one and accepted by another.
The part you presumed is incorrect. It said clearly you only get one interview for all campuses on the secondary.wait lol sorry but this confused me, you said "you get one interview" but you could be "interviewed by one and (preumably interviewed separately and) accepted by another," so which is it?
thanks!!The part you presumed is incorrect. It said clearly you only get one interview for all campuses on the secondary.
No separate interview. Again, it's one school. You get one interview, but are considered by all the campuses you rank, in the order you rank them. You won't receive more than one acceptance, but it might not be at the campus you interviewed with.wait lol sorry but this confused me, you said "you get one interview" but you could be "interviewed by one and (preumably interviewed separately and) accepted by another," so which is it?
I have no doubt they have separate committees, but it's still one application with one potential interview.Oh they used to have separate applications for arizona and rochester. I’m pretty sure I got Rs from both previously so I thought there might be two committees
congrats!! you need to upload your photo firstFL II JUST NOW!!! Can someone who has registered for the interview week confirm with me that we are unable to see the selected week until we input our times?... Or do we have to uplaod photo first?
II today at 10:52AM, MN/FL. Complete 8/1. 52X MCAT, 3.8X cGPA. So excited first II!!!Any FL (with either AZ or MN) II?
Just curious, how did you know it was MN/FL and not AZ/FL?II today at 10:52AM, MN/FL. Complete 8/1. 52X MCAT, 3.8X cGPA. So excited first II!!!
Maybe if they ranked it first!Just curious, how did you know it was MN/FL and not AZ/FL?
Yup! I ranked MN/FL first!Maybe if they ranked it first!
Was it AZ/FL or MN/FL?omg II with FL
Oh for me I did not put AZ/FL as an option so by default it was MN/FL. The II email just said Florida campus though.Just curious, how did you know it was MN/FL and not AZ/FL?
I put AZ/FL as my top choice, I think all partial FL interview with the Florida campus. Hope this helps!Was it AZ/FL or MN/FL?
Just to clarify, a thank you note after receiving an II, or after the interview?I’m gonna drop some inside advice I got from someone previously on the admin committee now that I see people getting IIs. WRITE A THANK YOU LETTER AFTER YOUR II. Apparently (and this is their words, not mine) they won’t accept someone if they don’t send a thank you letter - I know, sounds crazy, but you should be doing this anyway because I’m sure you are thankful for their time and you should express that!
I’m not planning on applying here, but good luck to everyone who is!
After the interviewJust to clarify, a thank you note after receiving an II, or after the interview?
Do you mean a physical letter or email is seen the same as well?I’m gonna drop some inside advice I got from someone previously on the admin committee now that I see people getting IIs. WRITE A THANK YOU LETTER AFTER YOUR INTERVIEW. Apparently (and this is their words, not mine) they won’t accept someone if they don’t send a thank you letter - I know, sounds crazy, but you should be doing this anyway because I’m sure you are thankful for their time and you should express that!
I’m not planning on applying here, but good luck to everyone who is!
I typed out a letter, converted it to PDF, added a signature, and handwritten signature, and uploaded it onto the portal! Seemed to work just fine.Do you mean a physical letter or email is seen the same as well?
Lmao I think they have the highest MCAT secondary screen in the country"MCAT blind through interviews" yet has nearly the highest MCAT average on the tracker and nearly highest proportion of 520+. Lol.
Ergo, "MCAT blind through interviews" means squat.Lmao I think they have the highest MCAT secondary screen in the country
Website lists the secondary screen cut-off as a 508Ergo, "MCAT blind through interviews" means squat.
Edit: even then, highest means what. 512? Still doesn't explain the insanity on the tracker.
That's not that high. UCLA is 512. I'm thinking they're just not "MCAT blind" at all. Like if they were, then we wouldn't see the similar pattern of URM/high stat early, which is exactly what we are seeing lmao. They aren't even trying to hide it.Website lists the secondary screen cut-off as a 508
TBH, I don't see anything on their website or MSAR that suggests they are MCAT blind at any stage of their process. Exactly where is this coming from?That's not that high. UCLA is 512. I'm thinking they're just not "MCAT blind" at all. Like if they were, then we wouldn't see the similar pattern of URM/high stat early, which is exactly what we are seeing lmao. They aren't even trying to hide it.
The UCLA cut-off is not valid. I know of individuals from last cycle that were accepted with lower than cut-offThat's not that high. UCLA is 512. I'm thinking they're just not "MCAT blind" at all. Like if they were, then we wouldn't see the similar pattern of URM/high stat early, which is exactly what we are seeing lmao. They aren't even trying to hide it.
I have definitely heard of this MCAT "cut-off" being a thing, but also know multiple students accepted/sent secondaries with lower than cut-off. Not sure if they just put you into manual review if you don't meet the cut-off?The UCLA cut-off is not valid. I know of individuals from last cycle that were accepted with lower than cut-off
Yea they need to keep their MSAR/US-News looking good; watch "wholly MCAT-blind" UCSF have a 518 average next year haha.That's not that high. UCLA is 512. I'm thinking they're just not "MCAT blind" at all. Like if they were, then we wouldn't see the similar pattern of URM/high stat early, which is exactly what we are seeing lmao. They aren't even trying to hide it.
You know what they say about lies, damn lies, and statistics, don't you? So, I'd be careful with that. UCSF is going to be one of the best, most difficult schools in the country to be admitted to, regardless of whether or not they look at the MCAT.Yea they need to keep their MSAR/US-News looking good; watch "wholly MCAT-blind" UCSF have a 518 average next year haha.
Sure, I got a high MCAT myself but would think very highly of one with a 3.x, 50x, but first author pubs in PubMed, military officer, etc.You know what they say about lies, damn lies, and statistics, don't you? So, I'd be careful with that. UCSF is going to be one of the best, most difficult schools in the country to be admitted to, regardless of whether or not they look at the MCAT.
As a result, it's going to attract the very best applicants in the country, many of whom are going to have great MCAT scores, even if they aren't considered. Consequently, their average or median isn't really going to tell you anything. OTOH, their 10%-ile will. THAT will tell you whether or not they are actually admitting otherwise outstanding candidates with crappy MCAT scores (since they aren't being considered) or whether their statement is PR BS.
Exactly, and that's what they are going for with their policy. But just consider how few candidates like that are out there. Many more people with those achievements also have 3.9+/520+. This is why their averages or medians are unlikely to move, while their 10%-ile might.Sure, I got a high MCAT myself but would think very highly of one with a 3.x, 50x, but first author pubs in PubMed, military officer, etc.
Lmao, thanks for the clarification if true. I remember seeing a comment on here and I even replied to it asking if this was true and people seemed to agree...hahahaTBH, I don't see anything on their website or MSAR that suggests they are MCAT blind at any stage of their process. Exactly where is this coming from?
Nothing here either! II date was Aug 17 for Minnhas anybody gotten confirmation of what day/time their interview will be? got my II for the Arizona track on Aug 16
I could schedule mine in the portal and am scheduled/confirmed for 9/24. Haven't given me the exact time yet tho. II was on the 16th for minnesotahas anybody gotten confirmation of what day/time their interview will be? got my II for the Arizona track on Aug 16