serotonin1
Full Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2021
- Messages
- 309
- Reaction score
- 734
Submitted, complete email came immediately. Good luck, everyone!
FYI I have not received their secondary, I'm a low GPA high MCAT non-trad, I've heard they initially stat-screen you and if either your MCAT or GPA fall below a threshold then you get punted to manual review? I'll update this thread if I end up getting one after a delay.+(n+1) I wonder how holistic their screen really is
Where did you hear this? They gave a pretty detailed explanation on their website, and there was no mention of this. You could receive a secondary after others for a number of reasons that have nothing to do with an auto-screen followed by a manual review. I have received secondaries at some schools that don't screen at all over a week after others, and my primary was transmitted as early as anyone.FYI I have not received their secondary, I'm a low GPA high MCAT non-trad, I've heard they initially stat-screen you and if either your MCAT or GPA fall below a threshold then you get punted to manual review? I'll update this thread if I end up getting one after a delay.
Same here! Good luck y’all!Submitted, complete email came immediately. Good luck, everyone!
No. It is just saying they got your application."At this time, your application will be put in the queue to be reviewed by our Admissions Committee."
Does this mean I am going to be manually reviewed rather than being automatically sent a secondary?
For reference, I have a 3.42 GPA and 521 MCAT, so very unbalanced stats.
According to their website, nobody automatically receives a secondary, and yes, it looks like they are telling you that your application is in the queue. probably to keep you from becoming concerned when you see other people receiving secondaries."At this time, your application will be put in the queue to be reviewed by our Admissions Committee."
Does this mean I am going to be manually reviewed rather than being automatically sent a secondary?
For reference, I have a 3.42 GPA and 521 MCAT, so very unbalanced stats.
Not really. It's better than the alternative, but, passing a screen that 2/3 of everyone passes isn't really a predictor with respect to the outcomes of 5-20% screens at other schools!So is the general consensus that getting secondary decisions at Vandy are a bellweather for the cycle? Maybe less so than UCSF/LA/SD, but a secondary here is a decent indicator for getting an II at least somewhere? Haven’t gotten any IIs yet but got a some secondaries from “holistic” schools.
which schools have 5-20% screens?Not really. It's better than the alternative, but, passing a screen that 2/3 of everyone passes isn't really a predictor with respect to the outcomes of 5-20% screens at other schools!
For IIs? All of them, when you separate out IS and OOS.which schools have 5-20% screens?
oh lol, i thought you meant there were schools that only give secondaries to 5-20% of the poolFor IIs? All of them, when you separate out IS and OOS.
No, no LOL. @voxveritatisetlucis was asking if receiving the Vandy secondary was an indicator for receiving an II anywhere. It isn't!oh lol, i thought you meant there were schools that only give secondaries to 5-20% of the pool
I've heard people say before that getting holistically screened secondaries means you likely have a "healthy primary". But you could obviously mess up at many other stages, and also being healthy doesn't mean being excellent. So I would say its not a bad sign, but hard to interpret how meaningful it really is.True, but assuming they actual do a complete review, I am guessing that it means that the primary application must not have a “poison pill.” Unless of course, the auto-screen has any legitimacy.
If its something in your primary then its probably a good sign that you got Vbilt, however we still don't really know what the screening process is so I wouldn't count your chickens yetI have good stats, ECs, recommendations but also something that other SDN members have said could render my app DOA
Yeah, I'm taking them at their word, because they are going out of their way to be very transparent, and they have no need to do so. As a result, it is clear, at least to me, that the secondary screen is not meant to be a complete review. It is what they claim it is, a preliminary review to thin the herd from 7,400 to 5,250, from which they select 750 to interview. THAT is the complete review!!!True, but assuming they actual do a complete review, I am guessing that it means that the primary application must not have a “poison pill.” Unless of course, the auto-screen has any legitimacy.
If you should have learned anything about SDN by now, it's that you can't take anything anyone says here as gospel, because there are n=1 exceptions to everything. Plus, specifically in your case, plenty of people have opined that you will be fine.I have good stats, ECs, recommendations but also something that other SDN members have said could render my app DOA
I think you're going to be fine. If you're not a CA resident, the UCs honestly did you a favor and saved you some money. Numbers game is totally your call, but if you are making it through secondary screens, there is nothing inherently defective in your application.Yes I got the secondary here, rush, Cinnci, mcw and a few other places that I’ve heard screen but not the UCs unfortunately. So I’m kind of still caught in the middle, debating whether to add some additional schools to play the numbers game
i doubt when they see it they even see how many words you have filled out. Being succinct is a positive thingWould it look bad if I don't reach 600 words? I can get my point across in the essays (besides the diversity one) within 350-400 words. I don't want them to think I'm being lazy for not being anywhere close to 600.
Then that's your answer! Regardless of what any prompt might presuppose, the whole point is for you to be you, and answer the question in a way that is appropriate for you. It's perfectly legit to say you would do nothing different if that's the case, rather than stretching to give them what you think they want. Not being genuine is the quickest way to the reject pile as they struggle to curate a class."Tell us about a time when you interacted with someone who is different than you. What did you learn? What would you do differently? (600 words)"
Does anyone have insight into how to answer this question? I feel like the question presupposes that meeting with someone differently causes you to interact in an incorrect or unfair way, especially since it focuses on what would you do differently. I feel like you can meet someone that is different than you in various ways and that does not necessarily mean that you would respond to them in a way that necessitates doing things differently in the future? Thoughts.
I was verified June 1 and I still don't have a secondary. I checked last year's thread and they were still sending out secondaries in August. The prescreen for this school is done by real people, so Im hoping that they are just taking their timeI was verified July 15. Anyone who was verified around this date still not have a secondary invite? Kind of worried
A little more generous than they promised with respect to screening out 1/3 pre-secondary. Unless they are figured that early applications tend to be stronger, and they are planning on screening more out later on.View attachment 341216
Just an update from the tracker!
Did they say that they were going to start sending out II's today? (Or is there something else special about today that I'm missing?😅)Good luck to everyone tomorrow! I wonder if they'll start on day one
Their website says that today is the first day that they could send out II's! However, looking at last year's thread, most people didn't get II's until a couple of weeks after the first date that they set for last year.Did they say that they were going to start sending out II's today? (Or is there something else special about today that I'm missing?😅)
Ah. Thanks for the heads up! I was looking at the date I had down from their MSAR page which said August 1st so I wasn't super sure.Their website says that today is the first day that they could send out II's! However, looking at last year's thread, most people didn't get II's until a couple of weeks after the first date that they set for last year.
I really hope it won't hurt! I also received mine 7/15 and am hoping to submit later today so we are in the same boat lolI received my secondary 7/15 and submitted today - 1 day after the 2 week mark (7/30). No sure if submitting beyond the 2 week point is good but does anyone have any insight on whether this will influence my app being read or not haha
Mind sharing how to get access to this tracker? Thank you!View attachment 341216
Just an update from the tracker!
it's on Vanderbilt's MD admissions page!Mind sharing how to get access to this tracker? Thank you!
Thank you!it's on Vanderbilt's MD admissions page!
Do you remember the screens for those schools? B/c I'm a low-stat-ish applicant and no way did I get those secondaries because of some stats screen.Yes I got the secondary here, rush, Cinnci, mcw and a few other places that I’ve heard screen but not the UCs unfortunately. So I’m kind of still caught in the middle, debating whether to add some additional schools to play the numbers game
+1 haven't received one yet. Funny because I received one last year with similar statsHas anyone received a secondary that clearly went through the holistic screen? Worried I’m already rejected
Are you worried? It seems like we should have heard already like looking at the tracker. I did internship there so I thought that alone would be okay to get the secondary.+1 haven't received one yet. Funny because I received one last year with similar stats
On their website, they say everyone does. Since everyone has been delayed from the very beginning of the cycle (earliest secondaries didn't go out until 7/14) there is no way to know for certain that this really happens, but they also have no reason to lie about it. Of course, I'm sure the secondary review for the 3.9/518 applicant is a little less holistic than for the 3.5/512 one, but, still....Has anyone received a secondary that clearly went through the holistic screen? Worried I’m already rejected