- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all,
First time posting in this forum. Two days before the 5/15 deadline, and I'm torn between two schools. Would appreciate any input.
UCLA
Pros:
- I am from Socal and strongly would like to stay in CA, especially having completed undergrad in MA. I much prefer the culture here and the chance to be near family.
- Larger class (165) - chances to meet many people, less stifling.
Cons:
- Traffic, especially during clinical years.
- High cost of living in and near the Westwood area.
- Full tuition, even in-state, is pricey ($150K total)
- I have to take one term of community college physics this summer to meet the prematriculation requirements...
- Larger class - afraid the community will be less cohesive and integrated.
- Traditional curriculum.
Vanderbilt
Pros:
- 75% tuition scholarship - amounts to $130K. Obviously this is important.
- Lower cost of living.
- Less traffic.
- Small class (90) - lots of bonding and support.
- New curriculum - start clinical rotations in second year! I think this, while scary, is a big bonus even though it means an abbreviated first year summer, when I'd really like to go abroad for global health research.
Cons:
- Patient population less diverse.
- Fewer training locations.
- I went for revisit, and felt lukewarm about my potential classmates. Culture seemed fine but not laid back Californian either. I did not like the city of Nashville - it doesn't correspond to my interests (hiking, open water, modern art, etc. I am not interested in country music or live music in general and this was heavily touted.) And it's relatively far from other major cities.
- I would not like to stay in the South or anywhere on the East Coast past medical school.
- Far from family. Mom would not have time in her schedule to visit, ever.
- Small class - maybe too stifling.
So... is $150K (no loans or interest, but a twinge of guilt - I also won't be taking out loans for living costs) worth a better location and perhaps better clinical training opportunities at UCLA? I know the tendency on SDN is to take the money and run. But my parents are offering me the chance...
First time posting in this forum. Two days before the 5/15 deadline, and I'm torn between two schools. Would appreciate any input.
UCLA
Pros:
- I am from Socal and strongly would like to stay in CA, especially having completed undergrad in MA. I much prefer the culture here and the chance to be near family.
- Mom works abroad and can easily fly into LAX; grandparents and Dad live approx an hour away.
- WEATHER. I have mild SAD and the winter in undergrad was really miserable. I love sunshine probably more than the average person - grew up swimming and surfing in the ocean.
- If not Ophtho, I would still strongly prefer to match in a UCLA or UCSD- affiliated hospital.
- More diverse patient population
- Great mentoring / career-oriented blocks in the curriculum.
- Larger class (165) - chances to meet many people, less stifling.
Cons:
- Traffic, especially during clinical years.
- High cost of living in and near the Westwood area.
- Full tuition, even in-state, is pricey ($150K total)
- I have to take one term of community college physics this summer to meet the prematriculation requirements...
- Larger class - afraid the community will be less cohesive and integrated.
- Traditional curriculum.
Vanderbilt
Pros:
- 75% tuition scholarship - amounts to $130K. Obviously this is important.
- Lower cost of living.
- Less traffic.
- Small class (90) - lots of bonding and support.
- New curriculum - start clinical rotations in second year! I think this, while scary, is a big bonus even though it means an abbreviated first year summer, when I'd really like to go abroad for global health research.
Cons:
- Patient population less diverse.
- Fewer training locations.
- I went for revisit, and felt lukewarm about my potential classmates. Culture seemed fine but not laid back Californian either. I did not like the city of Nashville - it doesn't correspond to my interests (hiking, open water, modern art, etc. I am not interested in country music or live music in general and this was heavily touted.) And it's relatively far from other major cities.
- I would not like to stay in the South or anywhere on the East Coast past medical school.
- Far from family. Mom would not have time in her schedule to visit, ever.
- Small class - maybe too stifling.
So... is $150K (no loans or interest, but a twinge of guilt - I also won't be taking out loans for living costs) worth a better location and perhaps better clinical training opportunities at UCLA? I know the tendency on SDN is to take the money and run. But my parents are offering me the chance...