Hi Everyone,
I have to make a hard decision and choose between UW-Madison and Tulane medical school. I was hoping to get some advice. It would be great to hear from people who are really familiar with these schools, and/or are attending one of them.
Here is my situation:
I'm from California. I love it here, and hope to come back at some point (it would be great to come back to Cali for my residency)
My opinion of the two schools:
Pros:
Tulane: I fell in love with NOLA, and could easily see myself live there. I really liked the students at Tulane. They seemed well-rounded, diverse, and happy. The school seems to emphasize a balanced life for it's students. Also the clinical opportunity there seems very unique and their emphasis on training stellar clinicians is very appealing to me. Overall it seems like I could be very happy there.
UW-Madison: UW is truly an impressive school. They have a strong emphasis on primary care and are big on research. This appeals to me a lot, since I want to be at a place that trains strong clinicians, but also encourages research. Madison seems like a clean, and beautiful city. Sailing is big there, and that's great for me since I'm a sailor.
Cons:
Tulane: they were hit hard by the hurricane, but have improved a lot, and they have a badass dean that partly makes up for it. They're not very strong in research, and this is somewhat bothersome. I don't know how reputable Tulane is among residency program directors. NOLA can be a dangerous place to live in, and they get serious Hurricanes!
UW-Madison: because its a state school, 70% of their students are from Wisconsin. Less diversity, less "worldly" student population (compared to Tulane). The students seemed nice, but there were instances that raised red flags (but I can't really judge because my interactions were limited. Please don't take my statement the wrong way. I am not hating on anyone here, and I know that my limited interactions cannot describe the whole student population at UW. that's exactly, why I'm here asking advice)
The winters at Madison are brutal! There's not as much to do in Madison, as say a place like NOLA.
Considerations: I really like both schools, and although I think I like NOLA more than Madison, I could make myself happy in Madison. The most important deciding factor for me at this point is how each of these schools affect my chances of residency. Are there significant difference between these two schools when it comes to matching for residency? Would going to one over the other significantly improve my chances or put me at a disadvantage?
Although reputation is not that important to me, I was wondering how these two schools compare when it comes to national reputation among doctors, and most importantly among residency program directors?
I really appreciate your feedback!
Thank you
I have to make a hard decision and choose between UW-Madison and Tulane medical school. I was hoping to get some advice. It would be great to hear from people who are really familiar with these schools, and/or are attending one of them.
Here is my situation:
I'm from California. I love it here, and hope to come back at some point (it would be great to come back to Cali for my residency)
My opinion of the two schools:
Pros:
Tulane: I fell in love with NOLA, and could easily see myself live there. I really liked the students at Tulane. They seemed well-rounded, diverse, and happy. The school seems to emphasize a balanced life for it's students. Also the clinical opportunity there seems very unique and their emphasis on training stellar clinicians is very appealing to me. Overall it seems like I could be very happy there.
UW-Madison: UW is truly an impressive school. They have a strong emphasis on primary care and are big on research. This appeals to me a lot, since I want to be at a place that trains strong clinicians, but also encourages research. Madison seems like a clean, and beautiful city. Sailing is big there, and that's great for me since I'm a sailor.
Cons:
Tulane: they were hit hard by the hurricane, but have improved a lot, and they have a badass dean that partly makes up for it. They're not very strong in research, and this is somewhat bothersome. I don't know how reputable Tulane is among residency program directors. NOLA can be a dangerous place to live in, and they get serious Hurricanes!
UW-Madison: because its a state school, 70% of their students are from Wisconsin. Less diversity, less "worldly" student population (compared to Tulane). The students seemed nice, but there were instances that raised red flags (but I can't really judge because my interactions were limited. Please don't take my statement the wrong way. I am not hating on anyone here, and I know that my limited interactions cannot describe the whole student population at UW. that's exactly, why I'm here asking advice)
The winters at Madison are brutal! There's not as much to do in Madison, as say a place like NOLA.
Considerations: I really like both schools, and although I think I like NOLA more than Madison, I could make myself happy in Madison. The most important deciding factor for me at this point is how each of these schools affect my chances of residency. Are there significant difference between these two schools when it comes to matching for residency? Would going to one over the other significantly improve my chances or put me at a disadvantage?
Although reputation is not that important to me, I was wondering how these two schools compare when it comes to national reputation among doctors, and most importantly among residency program directors?
I really appreciate your feedback!
Thank you