albany's website is confusing as hell. what grading system is this school using? is there a student handbook or something
Here is explanation of their grades:
http://www.amc.edu/Academic/Undergraduate/EvaluationStudentPerformance.html
What was explained to me at the interview is that it is modified Pass/Fail - it is based on your Z-score, and most everyone gets a Good (+/- about 1.5 standard deviations, or about 90% of the class). If you're above that you get Excellent (E) and above that is Excellent with Honors (EH). E is probably about 10 students, and EH is probably about 1-3. If you score below the Good region, you'll get an Marginal (M), or if you do really poorly, a Unsatisfactory (U). You only fail and have to remediate if you get a U, not if you get an M. The curriculum is systems-based (they call it "themes"), and you can fit 1-2 in during the summer. If it's more than what can fit during the summer, only then do you need to redo the whole year.
The students stressed that you have to try pretty hard to get a U for a system block - you often can see the score distribution posted after each test, and they might map out where the G range is and point out if you're in U territory, so with this knowledge your grade can be fixed in time for the next test or the final, and of course only the overall grade for the block matters. And if you do get a U in one of the blocks, it's unlikely you'll get 2 and have to redo the whole year because presumably you'd be studying a little harder or adjusting your study methods to avoid that.
There is no requirement for failing a certain number of people, and the range for the Good grades will vary based on whoever is in charge of each system, and probably based on how the distribution falls.
Additionally, when reporting this information for residency applications, students seemed to say it was more like Pass/Fail because residencies would either see the overall grade distributions and thus essentially see the fact that pretty much everyone gets a G, or that the school only reports if you were in the top third or not. I also heard at one point that clinicals were graded in the same EH/E/G/M/U fashion, but the website seems to mention an additional "professional profile", which no one mentioned... but we didn't run into too many third or fourth years during the day, so I'm not entirely sure about grading during clinicals.
On the website it mentions that this top third of the class determination (which seems to be cumulative through the 3rd year) is course duration weighted, because the themes are of varying number of weeks in length.