Thanks! I see Ohio is showing you some love too!
😍
Sorry I missed your post. I've been doing a gorilla-warfare sort of checking...way early in the morning, mid morning, and late evening. Sort of a staccato-style.
Oh yeah, the survey my group never did...oops!
😳 Nobody mentioned anything about it at the end of the day (...or the minority session, come to think of it), and we all were sort of running on fumes anyways and dispersed.
I think there is a lot of truth to CCLCMer's statement. Not to get (too) philosophical, but I liken the 'easy' interviews to the sort of "Jay Leno" interviews I am not fond of watching. If Leno (or anyone for that matter) has a vapid flavor-of-the-week guest who is un-interesting beyond their surface, the questions often are shallow and lighthearted (some may say all of his guests fall into this category). In the same manner, I don't think medical school interview questions get too difficult when the interviewer doesn't think you can handle them. Nobody likes to watch a train wreck.
On the other hand, if the person had depth of character or knowledge/talent, I think what is refreshing and stimulating is more difficult and thought provoking lines of questioning.
I've done a fair share of technical interviews (sometimes as panel or 2-on-1, or 1-on-1, much like med school). Even a couple of times interviewing people with much higher credentials than myself, how strange!
I know I've pulled punches during a few interviews because I saw that it would not lead to an offer. I don't suppose it is any different here.
So in short, the tougher questions the stronger the candidate. Unless your interviewer hates you.