

If I were not a Duke undergrad, I would go to Duke. But since you are, it's hard to decide because it might be a good idea to look for a different experience and live in a new location. 8 years at Duke and possibly residency as well is a lot of time in Durham, not one of the best places. Northwestern would give you the same opportunities if you do well, and Chicago is a great city.
These are really good points. Is there any appreciable difference in their academic reputation? I feel like they're both really good schools so there isn't much dropoff from one program to another. But yea Chicago is def better place to live.
Reputation-wise, Duke trumps NW.
Lol true.
But living wise, Chicago trumps Durham.
If you're into the city thing. Durham's a lot warmer. 😛
But for OP, NW's the "correct" answer.
If I were not a Duke undergrad, I would go to Duke. But since you are, it's hard to decide because it might be a good idea to look for a different experience and live in a new location. 8 years at Duke and possibly residency as well is a lot of time in Durham, not one of the best places. Northwestern would give you the same opportunities if you do well, and Chicago is a great city.
I've definitely started to et bored of Durham. It's a nice city, but I'm ready for something fresh. Chicago was amazing when I visited, and I'm originally from the Midwest, so the weather doesn't intimidate me. I was more concerned about the reputation of each school. I wouldn't want to be a sold short a reputable residency because NU is lower in the rankings. But I guess all things considered, the difference in research rank shouldn't be too significant?