Poorly DWWawn Mafia (gamethread)

Started by Clem J
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Even genny, when she actually explained her view on AM, said it made sense for her village progression but that she's good at replicating it as a wolf.

Which to me is like

Not a strong read.

And since she said she could only really pair her with me, and I know I'm village, the genny point doesn't even register.

I don't think wolf AM would have let up on you, Spurs. I also don't think she would have specifically asked for people to comment on her ISO to give their thoughts if she was intentionally being manipulative. You don't really ask people to consider those things more closely if you know your case is bad. I think that's village AM trying to find you and asking other people to help her.
I have to admit, your last paragraph is the main reason I hesitated before putting AM’s name on the board. While I dislike the content and conclusions of that ISO, the tone of the post itself and the follow up wasn’t bad. If it makes sense, I almost felt like if she was a wolf she would have been more meticulous about her argument.

I am not completely sold on being in that universe. It would be nice if @genny would expound on her thoughts.

I really wish PSV was still here to bounce this off.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Yes, breaking a tie towards you instead of squeeb. Or fruit. Or me.

And I'm not saying this automatically condemns you, but pointing out how you're, at the very least, strongly misremembering PSV's confidence in you/distrust in me. You never note intention to break a tie to someone you're "near certain is village" unless it's to save a seer or something.
PSV not being fully confident in me has nothing to do with her conclusion on you. I’m town so it doesn’t matter if PSV wasn’t convinced of that fact. But her not agreeing with your conclusions validates that I thought you were overstating your case against me.
 
I thought i had already answered those?

Or i guess im thinking of my reply to spurs maybe. I’ll get to it in the morning
You only answered that I should have been dead over PSV. Which I don't follow at all but it's an answer nonetheless.

I still need to hear answers about the others though, especially since they concern living players.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
PSV not being fully confident in me has nothing to do with her conclusion on you.
It actually does. It concludes she was more okay with you dying D1 then me (or anyone else who wasn't exactly apop).
I’m town so it doesn’t matter if PSV wasn’t convinced of that fact. But her not agreeing with your conclusions validates that I thought you were overstating your case against me.
I'm village so I guess it doesn't matter what she thought about my case then if that's how this works. Agreeing with someone means they're lock town. Disagreeing means they're an outted wolf.
 
Alright I got my wordle. Now bedtime
Ok Bye GIF
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It actually does. It concludes she was more okay with you dying D1 then me (or anyone else who wasn't exactly apop).

I'm village so I guess it doesn't matter what she thought about my case then if that's how this works. Agreeing with someone means they're lock town. Disagreeing means they're an outted wolf.
I’m saying that in my own decision making process that PSV thought my reasons for finding you sus were valid.

If someone else would like to use PSV’s reasoning separately to build a case on me I’m sure they could.
I was purposefully hedgy to see if you’d hear what you wanted to hear and use it to build a case on AM.
And what does the fact that I did tell you?

ETA: I would still like your updated fruit thoughts.
 
Last edited:
I’m saying that in my own decision making process that PSV thought my reasons for finding you sus were valid.
She never said anything even remotely similar to that. All she said was that she disagreed with the things I found suspicious about you. Zero mentions about agreeing with any of your claims on me.
 
d2

Animal Midwife ( 1 ): spurs
fruitsalad ( 1 ): dubz
genny ( ):
GoSpursGo ( ):
kitzsuna ( 2 ): AM, fruit
SARdoghandler ( ):
screamqueenbee ( ):
WildZoo ( ):
Sleep ( ):
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
She never said anything even remotely similar to that. All she said was that she disagreed with the things I found suspicious about you. Zero mentions about agreeing with any of your claims on me.
I think we’re talking past each other. Clearly she didn’t say she explicitly that she thought you were sus, and that isn’t what I’m representing she said or thought. I wouldn’t lie in a manner that is so easily fact checked.

Like I said I’m not immovable on my vote.