- Joined
- Oct 14, 2014
- Messages
- 7,127
- Reaction score
- 14,758
Are you happy leaving a random vote flapping there in the breeze?
Given that I'm around to change it? Yeah, I'm fine with it.
Is there some reason I shouldn't be?
Are you happy leaving a random vote flapping there in the breeze?
I already said what I thought of caiter and sporty as kill options, cray has seemed herself (that is - A LOT so much that it’s almost sketch but it’s just her being true to form for now), glam has been quiet which I can’t be mad at yet and MJ I just have no feels either way.Did I imply that? What do you think of the other people on the board?
I think I'd rather let Sporty answer for herself firstSporty being village/bad this game is the only scenario I can think of, so if you have another please share.
You've got it. I'll forgive anyone for being wrong about a past game (how could I not?) but on the tails of what I felt was obtuseness, AND the fact that frankly all of it feels outside her meta (wanting to be mayor, being seemingly unconcerned about it, not catching onto my points about strategy (that mayor is a target on your back) AND being wrong *this* wrong about past games...) is what irked me.okay so reading this whole AM/cray partly Pippy interaction I have some questions.
@Crayola227 are you more bothered by AM being wrong about prevet vs lounge games, or the whole obtuse in responses bit you mentioned earlier?
Because for me personally I just voted there bc I feel like I can read AM if MJ won I would’ve been lost in that department. And at first i literally read what a mayor is supposed to do and thought hmm that’s AM. Not that there weren’t other good candidates, I just didn’t get to come back on and read posts before WZ closed the vote 😛
But anyways basically what I’m getting at is I am reading this whole interaction like you seemed to be upset about the mayor thing and self voting in general, and then AM’s responses (to me seemed normal) bothered you more. And then she misremembered things about past games which I know is unlike AM and honestly that’s the only part out of the whole exchange that made me have pause. Is that sorta right summary wise?
How do you define shenanigans?Zero mayoral shenanigans.
*****But I've missed you, boo
You ever talk to your friends about what breed you'd be?
I put up a long fight with my friends IRL about how I'm actually not a chihuahua (or pom, or peke)...but then I recently just gave in because you know what? Longhaired chis are freaking adorable, and I love them.
Edit to add cuteness:
Juuust asking.Given that I'm around to change it? Yeah, I'm fine with it.
Is there some reason I shouldn't be?
Have you met ski. you think she'd ever let me live it down if I did that.@finnickthedog @Caiter92
My vote on Caiter is because I feel like killing ski would be a reasonable thing to do in her position. Ski arguably knows her the best out of any of the players.
I already said what I thought of caiter and sporty as kill options, cray has seemed herself (that is - A LOT so much that it’s almost sketch but it’s just her being true to form for now), glam has been quiet which I can’t be mad at yet and MJ I just have no feels either way.
How do you define shenanigans?
Okay, I can definitely see the train of thought with everything you’ve said, the more I read it the more it felt like good guy on good guy lol.You've got it. I'll forgive anyone for being wrong about a past game (how could I not?) but on the tails of what I felt was obtuseness, AND the fact that frankly all of it feels outside her meta (wanting to be mayor, being seemingly unconcerned about it, not catching onto my points about strategy (that mayor is a target on your back) AND being wrong *this* wrong about past games...) is what irked me.
I agree that I can read AM better than MJ, and being able to read a player was guiding my vote earlier to Stagg. Ultimately I just felt like maybe giving it to someone besides AM. I wouldn't be surprised if there was at least one villager on her vote.
I get this, but given how things have gone for the pack in past games, I'm gonna bust my butt to get people to back things up with some reasoning.Not necessarily. Just putting a vote on the tally to stir up activity.
As a matter of fact, I have. Fancy that. Almost like we live in the same county.Have you met ski. you think she'd ever let me live it down if I did that.
So you should know your reasoning is very flawed.As a matter of fact, I have. Fancy that. Almost like we live in the same county.
just saying-- I don't think it's unreasonable for people to have seen your lynch vote, what you wrote with it, and think that you were trying to imply something.Did I imply that? What do you think of the other people on the board?
just saying-- I don't think it's unreasonable for people to have seen your lynch vote, what you wrote with it, and think that you were trying to imply something.
It’s WIFOMSo you should know your reasoning is very flawed.
I'm pretty sure I've played like one game with her ever aside from a speed game. That wouldn't even have crossed my mind. You harping on this so much is giving me feels.It’s WIFOM
Just because she’d be pissed doesn’t mean that you wouldn’t do it if you were worried she’d figure you out
Kay, I get the overdefensiveness (aren't you a newer player?), but you're starting to get into that zone that seems less nooby overdefensiveness and more villagery.I literally about got lynched three days ago because I liked a post I thought was funny. People thought I was sketch last game for actually trying to post ideas and theories. Can you not see how I would prefer not to have votes pile on if I can help it?
I'm going to disagree with this. It seemed odd to share when she only had 2 votes on her and was in a multi-way tie, and felt a little like over-sharing/over-clearing to me.Caiter's results don't mean anything for reasons already expounded upon by others. That said, I think it's a reach to suggest that her sharing them is sketchy behavior. To me, it doesn't say a thing about affiliation either way. I'm not even sure it's that unusual tbh.
I did?Kay, I get the overdefensiveness (aren't you a newer player?), but you're starting to get into that zone that seems less nooby overdefensiveness and more villagery.
If you want to maintain that you were just being defensive because you're gunshy of being killed, that's fine, but I think you need to let it go that being jailed last night is NAI. (not affiliation indicative)
Lol okI mean, if I have a strong reason to vote for someone, I'm not going to hide it from people.
I think there was more pressure before you broke the tie away from Sporty.I'm going to disagree with this. It seemed odd to share when she only had 2 votes on her and was in a multi-way tie, and felt a little like over-sharing/over-clearing to me.
kill caiter
but will be around to see where pressure on @SportPonies leads
I'm going to disagree with this. It seemed odd to share when she only had 2 votes on her and was in a multi-way tie, and felt a little like over-sharing/over-clearing to me.
but that's what I'm saying- the way you worded it definitely could come across as a strong reason to vote for her. Ex: a lucky N1 tracking result where you could assume she was probably notified that she was tracked. I guess I'd hope to see you also pushing more people to vote for her, which has kind of been the opposite today so that makes me think that you don't have a strong reason. But you've placed votes before with absolutely no reason before and wanted people to follow.I mean, if I have a strong reason to vote for someone, I'm not going to hide it from people.
I get this bc I’m all about going with your opinion and gut and everything. But for you personally you feel like the reasoning for Sporty or SAR is more affliction indicative based? (hopefully that makes sense)Meh, difference of opinion. As far as I'm concerned it's not unusual for people to random share their results. Sometimes even when they have one or no votes on them. I don't think it says much about whoever it is because I've seen both wolves and villagers do it.
And in regards to caiter specifically, she's one of the few people I'm getting village vibes from so I'm not thrilled about the idea of lynching her over something I consider not indicative affiliation.
Caiter is not a newer player.Kay, I get the overdefensiveness (aren't you a newer player?), but you're starting to get into that zone that seems less nooby overdefensiveness and more villagery.
If you want to maintain that you were just being defensive because you're gunshy of being killed, that's fine, but I think you need to let it go that being jailed last night is NAI. (not affiliation indicative)
I don't remember what finn said earlier that pippy quoted that made me feel like voting there, but this post above reads to me like actual decent villager hunting, so I'm off of voting on finn.Random thoughts on the people leading currently while I put off my studying...
Caiter's results don't mean anything for reasons already expounded upon by others. That said, I think it's a reach to suggest that her sharing them is sketchy behavior. To me, it doesn't say a thing about affiliation either way. I'm not even sure it's that unusual tbh.
I'm not clear on why people are following the SAR vote when no actual reason for it was given.
In regards to Sporty, my vote was indeed random but since I asked her a question I was hoping to hear from her before I considered moving my vote around.
Last time I ignored it and that back fired. I tried to not let that happen this time and that also backfired. So I just don't win lolCaiter is not a newer player.
And idk, I can kind of see her point about getting lynched for stupid stuff on D1 last game.
I get this bc I’m all about going with your opinion and gut and everything. But for you personally you feel like the reasoning for Sporty or SAR is more affliction indicative based? (hopefully that makes sense)
Edit: forgot a question mark
Last time I ignored it and that back fired. I tried to not let that happen this time and that also backfired. So I just don't win lol
Will catch up once I’m done volunteering at this spay/neuter clinic but I DID MY FIRST NEUTER TODAY! (no quotes pls)
Before this bandwagons even more, I was jailed/blocked last night.
D1: You found your door was locked. You couldn't leave your room, but at least you felt like no one could get to you either.
But I've missed you, boo
You ever talk to your friends about what breed you'd be?
I put up a long fight with my friends IRL about how I'm actually not a chihuahua (or pom, or peke)...but then I recently just gave in because you know what? Longhaired chis are freaking adorable, and I love them.
Edit to add cuteness:
Random thoughts on the people leading currently while I put off my studying...
Caiter's results don't mean anything for reasons already expounded upon by others. That said, I think it's a reach to suggest that her sharing them is sketchy behavior. To me, it doesn't say a thing about affiliation either way. I'm not even sure it's that unusual tbh.
I'm not clear on why people are following the SAR vote when no actual reason for it was given.
In regards to Sporty, my vote was indeed random but since I asked her a question I was hoping to hear from her before I considered moving my vote around.
can we please use the right words for this game before i get even more confused lolI'm not very thrilled with either the Sporty or the Caiter votes. I think both reasons those wagons started are NAI and likely they are both villagers. However, if it comes down to me vs. one of them, then I'd likely go for Caiter. Not for any real supported reasons, just that her wagon reason sounds mildly more bad-guy-y than Sporty's wagon reason. IDK.
Lynch Weim
Feels mostly from D1. I'd also be totally down for an Allie lynch. Though I've been struggling with myself that both of these may be retaliatory in nature - but I've got no clue how to separate myself from that so it is what it is.
What from D1 set off your feels?I'm not very thrilled with either the Sporty or the Caiter votes. I think both reasons those wagons started are NAI and likely they are both villagers. However, if it comes down to me vs. one of them, then I'd likely go for Caiter. Not for any real supported reasons, just that her wagon reason sounds mildly more bad-guy-y than Sporty's wagon reason. IDK.
Lynch Weim
Feels mostly from D1. I'd also be totally down for an Allie lynch. Though I've been struggling with myself that both of these may be retaliatory in nature - but I've got no clue how to separate myself from that so it is what it is.
While I did bring up what was in the write ups about being mayor maybe having someone to do with ties this game, I was mostly focused on the idea that being mayor is an overall liability for a wolf. Yes, it's a liability for villagers too. It's a liability all around. I am defining liability as = it ends up with a player being killed, mostly for being a mayor, or a villager mayor that screws the wolf pack vs a point of scrutiny. Sooooooo yeah, still side-eyeing people that put themselves up for the role.Things that would directly harm a mayor for being elected.
can we please use the right words for this game before i get even more confused lol
but you absolutely would, it is one of the things that drives me nutsI mean, if I have a strong reason to vote for someone, I'm not going to hide it from people.
you're fine haha I feel like we're all going to do this at first hahaOh my mother effing lord. Thank you, will edit again. Every goddam post
What from D1 set off your feels?
Okay it's starting to get to me, I keep having to reread everyone's posts when they say villager they mean bad and when they say wolf they mean good. Unless they forget and they actually mean the opposite (or the usual meanings of the words).
I don't know what the point of me saying this is other than if I totally misread something you say it's just because I just totally misread something you said.