2009-2010 UCLA/Drew Application Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh! I am not sure why Drew doesn't notify people to keep them up to date...I can imagine the stress of receiving the "you will be notified after November" message and not receive any information after that. Sucks!
Nope, no letter...just an e-mail that states that they have yet to make a decision on my file.
 
Did you get your letter? Because it's been about a month since UCLA sent out first acceptances.

MsTaco and I got our "intel" from last year's thread. You should read through it. It gives some pretty useful information, although no one can say 100% that what happened last year is what Drew always does. But, just telling from what's going on with people who already inteviewed this year, we're not too far off the mark.

Oops, I meant to post that reply to your last message.
See below🙂
 
Interview invite for March 6th!!!! :woot::banana:

Complete by 01/08/10 (I had to check the status page myself).

It's far from being in but hot DAYUM!!!!
 
Interview invite for March 6th!!!! :woot::banana:

Complete by 01/08/10 (I had to check the status page myself).

It's far from being in but hot DAYUM!!!!


Good luck!!! I didn't even know they were still doing interviews.
 
Good luck!!! I didn't even know they were still doing interviews.


Yeah, reading last year's thread and going off of MsTaco's post leads me to believe they may be interviewing into April.
 
I don't know how everyone else can deal with the wait. In Texas, we interview in August, September and we know if we get in (if lucky) November.
 
I don't know how everyone else can deal with the wait. In Texas, we interview in August, September and we know if we get in (if lucky) November.


We're definitely more laid back here in California, as you can tell with the later acceptances of the UCs. And the incredibly slow turn-around at Drew. 🙂
 
sigh.. haven't heard from them since submitting my secondary... u?
 
To those interviewing this Saturday, kindly ask how many acceptances have gone out so far? Thanks!!🙂
 
Interview invite for March 6th!!!! :woot::banana:

Complete by 01/08/10 (I had to check the status page myself).

It's far from being in but hot DAYUM!!!!

Hope the interview went well🙂
Did they happen to give any new information about when student would be notified?
 
Essentially, Dr. Calmes told our group not to hold our breath (not verbatim; this is me paraphrasing). She would not give us a date of notification, because it creates a problem when she doesn't have an answer for students by that date. She did admit to us that it would take a WHILE. Not to say that those applicants who interviewed early in the cycle won't hear soon...that comment may just apply to our interview group. She also stated that the class is not full by far.

An interesting factoid that she gave us is that they will no longer be doing Saturday interviews. Wonder what the new sched will be.

Also very cool, was that we got to meet Mervyn Dymally!! He stayed with us the whole day.

So, we're all on the waitlist until we get rejected/accepted. Send in your letters if you feel they'll help (this was not told to my interview group; this is just my opinion), and hope for the best. 👍
 
How did you feel about your interviews?

Did she say if they will be more interviews during this cycle?


Essentially, Dr. Calmes told our group not to hold our breath (not verbatim; this is me paraphrasing). She would not give us a date of notification, because it creates a problem when she doesn't have an answer for students by that date. She did admit to us that it would take a WHILE. Not to say that those applicants who interviewed early in the cycle won't hear soon...that comment may just apply to our interview group. She also stated that the class is not full by far.

An interesting factoid that she gave us is that they will no longer be doing Saturday interviews. Wonder what the new sched will be.

Also very cool, was that we got to meet Mervyn Dymally!! He stayed with us the whole day.

So, we're all on the waitlist until we get rejected/accepted. Send in your letters if you feel they'll help (this was not told to my interview group; this is just my opinion), and hope for the best. 👍
 
How did you feel about your interviews?

Did she say if they will be more interviews during this cycle?

As it is, feelings on anything are subjective, and you may feel that you did a kick-ass job and then when you get that waitlist/rejection, you clearly find out "not so much." At the same time, you may have done great, and everyone else agrees, but there are 2000 applicants for 24 spots. That's 1.2% of the people who submit an application to Drew. There's just not enough spots for all of the people who love Drew/UCLA and want to be there.

Dr. Calmes didn't say outright that there will be more interviews (probably because what happens after us doesn't necessarily pertain to us), and no one asked her to elaborate, but from the "this is our last Saturday interview (paraphrasing)," I gather that there will probably be at least one more interview. One of MsTaco's earlier posts stated that Ms. Rodriguez said there would be interviews in Feb, Mar, and Apr, too. So, it's not over by a long shot. But it's gonna really suck until you're forced to matriculate elsewhere/re-apply.
 
Last edited:
Ok. I don't think there will be more interview days, she also said there would be one in February but there wasn't. It would be strange for them to change their interview day mid-cycle, but I guess anything is possible. Hopefully we will be hearing soon as UCLA sent out acceptances 2 weeks ago and Drew usually comes 2-3 weeks after, according to the last acceptance date and last years thread. :luck: everyone
 
Ok. I don't think there will be more interview days, she also said there would be one in February but there wasn't. It would be strange for them to change their interview day mid-cycle, but I guess anything is possible. Hopefully we will be hearing soon as UCLA sent out acceptances 2 weeks ago and Drew usually comes 2-3 weeks after, according to the last acceptance date and last years thread. :luck: everyone

How do you know there wasn't a February interview date?
 
i interviewed at drew on sat, feb 20th. sandy told me they have interviews every month.
 
I just talked to Sandy on the phone and she said that they are going to be making decisions this week. She said that if any of us were to get interviews at this point, they would be through email. I also asked her about the "Nov. 15 mail" status that some of you had. She basically said that if anyone has that status, they will be sending out rejections in the mail later this week. Sorry to all of you guys with that status 🙁 and I hope there's some good news for us who are still in the running
 
i interviewed at drew on sat, feb 20th. sandy told me they have interviews every month.

Oops my bad, I was going by people on here. Then that means there are more interviewees than I thought, what is it 200?
 
Last edited:
I just called and she said the admissions committee is meeting next week so decisions will go out when they make them. Good luck everyone!!!:luck:
 
i'm sorry but they didnt tell me what month they will interview up to. on my interview date there were about 20 applicants in the morning session and 20 applicants in the afternoon session.
 
i'm sorry but they didnt tell me what month they will interview up to. on my interview date there were about 20 applicants in the morning session and 20 applicants in the afternoon session.

WOW, 40 students? My day, unless I only saw the morning session, there were about 22. Maybe they're dwindling down the sessions per day? What time did the afternoon session arrive? We left our interview day around 1:15pm.
 
Yeah, there were about 40 in my interview day, too (January). The morning and afternoon people saw each other at lunch time. There was one long table for us morning folks and another for the afternoon folks who just arrived. The student panel also happened during this lunch time.
 
Has anyone else called in this week? I always wonder at what point we can look completely nuts for calling too much. Medical students say all the time that you have to call and be in their face. But before an aceptance I feel that every time I call I look more and more like a stalker🙂.
 
No news over here but I'm still in the running to be America's Next Top Model
 


This post was disappointing. I subscribe to this thread, and every time I see a new post I'm thinking someone has an acceptance. Then I click and see that no, there's nothing new. We're just chewing the fat.

Sigh, now I understand the agony of waiting. And false hope...
 
Hello! I am new to the site. I interviewed on late January and I still have not heard anything either. The waiting is never ending and I just hope we get news soon. 🙂
 
This post was disappointing. I subscribe to this thread, and every time I see a new post I'm thinking someone has an acceptance. Then I click and see that no, there's nothing new. We're just chewing the fat.

Sigh, now I understand the agony of waiting. And false hope...

I am sorry about that. I interviewed in October and have been waiting anxiously for an update or any bit of news also. I have been checking the thread daily and it was just a tad refreshing to see something light/silly amongst all the anxiety and frustration.
 
I am sorry about that. I interviewed in October and have been waiting anxiously for an update or any bit of news also. I have been checking the thread daily and it was just a tad refreshing to see something light/silly amongst all the anxiety and frustration.


Aww, no need to apologize!!! I'm just a bit frustrated because the jury's out, but only one decision has come back. I just want to know whether I can quit my job or if I need to look for a new one. Whether I can burn my MCAT books or if I need to pick them up again (REALLY don't want to pick them up again!!!). Yeah, I'm just being a

Debbie_Downer.jpg
 
Sorry to hear that, hobbes.

But if I read correctly I think you have an acceptance already?? At least you've got something to work with, and you can definitely call yourself the class of 2014. Let's toast to that!! 🙂
 
Sorry to hear that, hobbes.

But if I read correctly I think you have an acceptance already?? At least you've got something to work with, and you can definitely call yourself the class of 2014. Let's toast to that!! 🙂


Yeah, I am all set and very happy, so no worries about me.

Good luck to everyone!
 
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]I know this is long, but hopefully interesting😉
Promoting Science Education
. [FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Marilyn Winkleby, PhD, MPH; Judith Ned, MEd, EdD .

[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif] JAMA. 2010;303(10):983-984. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]President Obama has called on scientists and health professionals to stand side-by-side with entertainers and athletes to "show young people how cool science can be."1 As part of his Educate to Innovate campaign,1 the President is promoting science education, with a focus on activities outside public school classrooms. The President's campaign encourages a broad sector of organizations and companies, including public television, private businesses, and foundations to champion science education. However, this campaign will be limited unless another vital sector—private and public universities—is included. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Universities, along with medical schools and other professional schools, have a unique capacity to promote excitement about science and medicine to young people by connecting them with strong role models, state-of-the-art laboratories, innovative technology, and hospital and laboratory internships. Given the greater flexibility of university extracurricular programs compared with public high school instruction, there is also the opportunity to focus on learning processes that promote stimulating, experiential, and cooperative learning as opposed to learning outcomes. Furthermore, universities can expose low-income and ethnic minority students to the culture of higher education, expand their knowledge base, and convey the need for them to enter science and health-related careers. In return, university-affiliated programs provide opportunities for faculty, staff, and students to develop skills in teaching science and create a positive awareness of universities among local communities. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Many students develop a lasting interest in science and medicine in informal settings: 75% of Nobel Prize winners in the sciences report that their passion for science was first sparked in nonschool environments.2 Furthermore, science activities that take place outside classrooms allow for activities to be tailored to students' experiences, "where the nature of knowledge can be explored and a lifetime commitment to self-directed learning can be forged."3 .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Crisis in Science Education.
spacer.gif
spacer.gif

The art of teaching and promoting an interest in science has traditionally been the purview of teachers within public schools; however, experts acknowledge that science education in many public schools is all but collapsing. An increasing number of reports document the decline of science education in the United States and lack of personnel from the scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics fields in the US workforce.4 A 2007 survey of 923 California elementary school teachers from 80 school districts found that 80% of teachers spent less than 1 hour each week teaching science, and 16% spent no time doing so.5 More than 40% of teachers felt unprepared to teach science whereas only 4% felt unprepared to teach math.5 Other reports emphasize the acute shortage of science and health professionals from underrepresented ethnic minority groups, an issue that will become increasingly important with health care reform.6
.
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]The most common approach for addressing the crisis in science education has been to direct resources to "fix" teaching and curricula at public schools. While some school-based reforms have demonstrated success, these efforts have often resulted in teaching to the test2 and have been compromised by changing federal, state, and district teaching mandates.4 Severe budgetary cuts compound the problem. In his annual address, the California superintendent of public instruction spoke of soaring class sizes and schools that put duct tape on light switches to conserve electricity. Students attending low-income schools are disproportionately affected by facilities that are overcrowded, in disrepair, or simply unsafe; teachers who lack adequate credentials or preparation; poorly equipped laboratories; inadequate technology; and outdated science textbooks. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Taking Advantage of Changing Demographics.
spacer.gif

The increasing number of older US individuals illustrates the need for new approaches to reach students who have potential in the sciences, but fail to attend college and enter science and health professions. In 2006, the first of the baby boom generation reached age 60 years. By 2100, it is estimated that the United States will be home to 131 million individuals aged 65 years or older, and 5.3 million individuals aged 100 years or older.7 An Institute of Medicine report emphasized that when the elderly population comprises up to 20% of the population by approximately 2050, "we will face a health care workforce that is too small and critically unprepared to meet their health needs."8
.
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Along with the increase in US's elderly population is an increase in its ethnic minority populations. In 2005, California, New Mexico, Texas, and Hawaii became the first nonwhite majority states.9 The rest of the United States will follow, with 50% of the US population expected to be ethnic "minority" by 2050.9 Compared with white non-Hispanics, a larger proportion of ethnic minority groups, especially Hispanics and blacks, are concentrated in the youngest age groups. Although thousands of young people from these age groups will join the workforce in the next 25 years, without new, effective outreach programs, they will remain severely underrepresented in higher education and in science and health-related careers. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Universities as Interventionists in Precollege Science Education.
spacer.gif

The worsening state of science education combined with trends in demographics provide an opportunity for President Obama to enlist universities as active partners in promoting science education to young people outside public school classrooms. For example, a Stanford University medical sciences pipeline program, supported in part by grants from a National Institutes of Health Science Education Partnership Award and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, serves as a case study of how universities and medical schools can promote science education. The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program offers a 5-week summer residential program for low-income, predominately black, Latino, and Native American high school students.10 Priority is given to students who are first-generation college students, have faced personal hardships, and are from underresourced schools, communities, or both, including rural and inner-city schools, and agricultural labor camps.
.
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Since 1988, the program has selected 24 students each summer to live on the Stanford University campus with 10 Stanford undergraduate staff, most of whom are from underrepresented ethnic minority groups and majoring in the sciences. Students are immersed in science and medicine through a broad curriculum that is based on scientific inquiry and includes anatomy practicums in the human cadaver laboratory (taught by medical students); hospital internships; group research projects; lectures by prominent scientists and physicians; college admissions and standardized test preparation; and long-term college and career guidance. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Five hundred students have completed the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program since 1988; 97% have been followed up for up to 21 years and 99% have been admitted to college. Of these, 78% of black, 81% of Latino, and 82% of Native American participants have earned a 4-year college degree (excluding those currently attending college).10 In contrast, among 25- to 34-year-old US adults, only 15% of blacks, 10% of Latinos, and 10% of Native Americans earn a 4-year college degree.10 Among the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program's college graduates, 47% are attending or have completed medical or graduate school and 43% are working as or training to become health professionals.10 Based on these outcomes, if one university in each state in the United States would support such a program, in 20 years more than 10 000 diverse low-income students could potentially enter science and health professions. .
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Active participation of universities in precollege science education can complement traditional approaches to learning science in classroom settings, help elevate science education as a national priority, and create an expanded pipeline for an educated workforce in scientific and health professions..
[FONT=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]
.
Hmmm, you must have a subscription or something. It's telling me to sign in. Can you post the article?
 
Does anyone recall how our files are evaluated post interview? Does Drew review them, then send them to UCLA for review? I vaguely remember this was mentioned at the interview but am not 100%. Thanks!
 
So called once again to the folks at Drew and got no update but apparently they said they will know next week. 🙂 What made me even more reassured is she told me next week they would know and I didn’t even ask her.
 
So called once again to the folks at Drew and got no update but apparently they said they will know next week. 🙂 What made me even more reassured is she told me next week they would know and I didn’t even ask her.

As much as I want to go to UCLA/Drew... I just want them to stop dragging it out and tell me if I'm in or not. I would love to go to La, but if not I'm fine going to med school in Philly.
 
I interviewed in the afternoon on January 23rd. They gave us the impression that many people don't hear back until April and May so there is still hope!
 
Does anyone recall how our files are evaluated post interview? Does Drew review them, then send them to UCLA for review? I vaguely remember this was mentioned at the interview but am not 100%. Thanks!


They didn't say that at our interview, but it was implied in posts from last year's thread. Seems only fair since UCLA is funding most if not all and Drew's stats contribute to UCLA's overall averages. And I wouldn't be surprised if there were applications that were controversial, i.e. Drew sent a file they loved to UCLA that UCLA wasn't too enthused about, and they had to duke it out in a hair-pulling, drag-out brawl. You hope the two can always agree, but sometimes it just doesn't work out.

It's frustrating, because you would think that with one interview a month, max two, that UCLA could set aside an additional hour during one of their monthly (?) meetings to address the Drew applicants. Then again, maybe they do. :shrug: To be a fly on the wall...

Joint programs are tricky. But worth it. I LOVE YOU DREW/UCLA!!!! 😍
 
OMG!!!!! I just got the call from Sandy!!!!! After 6 months of waiting I'm in!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top