well, i had one interviewer who was a pain the a$s...guess that's a good thing now? Lol
+1
well, i had one interviewer who was a pain the a$s...guess that's a good thing now? Lol
I know somebody who was accepted and Dr. Chan also told them that one of the reasons the U liked them was because they did well with a "difficult" interviewer. So it would appear that the admissions committee does have certain interviewers regarded as difficult, and if you get one of them and do well it's a huge bonus to your application. I feel this is too bad for myself and anybody else who felt that their interviewers were very friendly.
Did anyone that was accepted see their online portal change before they received the call?
The facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/uusom2017/?fref=ts has 58 members, I think 4 or 5 of which are administrators. I imagine they send an invite to join the group to all accepted students, but I also imagine some have not yet accepted it and/or don't use facebook, so I'm betting they have filled close to 60 or 70 of the spots by now. Fingers crossed.
I know somebody who was accepted and Dr. Chan also told them that one of the reasons the U liked them was because they did well with a "difficult" interviewer. So it would appear that the admissions committee does have certain interviewers regarded as difficult, and if you get one of them and do well it's a huge bonus to your application. I feel this is too bad for myself and anybody else who felt that their interviewers were very friendly.
The facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/uusom2017/?fref=ts has 58 members, I think 4 or 5 of which are administrators. I imagine they send an invite to join the group to all accepted students, but I also imagine some have not yet accepted it and/or don't use facebook, so I'm betting they have filled close to 60 or 70 of the spots by now. Fingers crossed.
Some other details I have gathered from the facebook group: 50/50 male to female ratio, and a disproportionate amount of U of U undergrad students, which I suppose should be expected. On another note, can anyone confirm or deny that all that calls have happened between the hours of 11-12 and 2-3?
Did anyone that was accepted see their online portal change before they received the call?
No, It took about 3 or 4 days till after i got the call till the portal changed.
Are there no calls today? I would have thought that we would have heard of a few calls by now.
Are there no calls today? I would have thought that we would have heard of a few calls by now.
dunno but the facebook page is now +1 to 61 members
I know a few people who have been accepted but are not on that facebook fan page. I am assuming the seats are nearly filled up now.
I know a few people who have been accepted but are not on that facebook fan page. I am assuming the seats are nearly filled up now.
dunno but the facebook page is now +1 to 61 members
I know some of the people on the fb page that are already matriculated (as in are already students in other years of med school), and it looks like a handful of them are. I'm guessing they have upper class members on there as well. So I wouldn't base all spots on pure numbers. Plus some (like Goldie) works in the admissions office but isn't listed as an administrator. I mean I know a handful of spots are gone, but I wouldn't take the group number as face value of accepted students for the upcoming class.
Of course, a lot of people who have been accepted may not have joined the facebook page. It really tells us very little, unfortunately.
Are there no calls today? I would have thought that we would have heard of a few calls by now.
No reported phone calls today. Interesting...
Very interesting! Maybe those accepted today don't use SDN???
This is getting old fast. What might have been a productive day was once again spent waiting for a phone call, and dreading each email notification. Let this end.
Of course, a lot of people who have been accepted may not have joined the facebook page. It really tells us very little, unfortunately.
I'm curious about why you seem to think that out of state options are the best route for Utah residents. Statistically speaking it is very straightforward for a utah resident to attend the U of U medical school. Look at the stats: https://www.aamc.org/download/161128/data/table1.pdf.OOS schools seems to be the way now for Utah students, no?
I called admissions today to see if it was too late to update some of my research that was accepted for publication today. The lady said it indeed was too late to update anything as all decisions for admission had been made and they are now preparing to send out materials. Not sure what that means for accepted students not yet notified.
I'm really hoping that today's the day! I'm also wondering if they have sent out all acceptances but 20 and are now waiting on the governor's signature.
From the stats I've seen, in the previous years, it looks like they have extended invitations to ~120 people for 82 spots because not everyone accepts. So I'm thinking that they might accept ~150 this year. I think there is still some hope. At least I HOPE there is still some hope! Hopefully we haven't only heard of the people who plan to matriculate here on SDN and there are a decent number of spots left! Wishful thinking?
I'm curious about why you seem to think that out of state options are the best route for Utah residents. Statistically speaking it is very straightforward for a utah resident to attend the U of U medical school. Look at the stats: https://www.aamc.org/download/161128/data/table1.pdf.
Only 403 Utah residents apply each year, and 75% of the class is composed of residents. Those are incredibly great odds for a utah resident. Compare that to UCSF where 3534 in state residents applicants apply each year. In state is the best way to go for a utah applicant.
All this talk about interviews from the phone calls with Dr. Chan is making me nervous. I thought they gave as much weight to your interviews as your GPA, and your service, and your leadership, etc...
Interviewers assign your application a score (1-5 w/ 5 being the best) based on the information and activities that you reported. Then, during the interview they verfiy their score. For example, they may discover that some lied about hours etc.. which would drastically lower that score. Or they find during an interview that a student has characteristics that didn't necessarily get across through their application: this could higher the score. Students with a cumalitve score of 10 or 12 (can't remember now, but I can verify if interested) from all three interviewers (whatever combination of individual scores) get moved one. Those who don't are stopped I believe. Then the committee looks over the total application, including interview scores, and assigns students a letter grade. A is better than Z. This is were students stand amongst all applicants.
So interview aren't necessarily weighted more heavily than your stats, but it's the only eyes that have seen your application and you in person, so the interview feedback really helps verify what you're preaching in your application.
Not necessarily. It depends on the school. I unfortunately discovered that almost every oos I applied to accepts extremely limited oos students (less than the U). If you're applying out of state, you have to really research each school. And applying to private schools (who don't consider state status) may be the majority of available options. Many private schools are very expensive and competitive to get in.
you just hafta find the diamond in the rough then lol =P
I did.
Does that mean you have an acceptance elsewhere? If so, congratulations!
I recently saw one of Dr Samuelson's presentations about the admissions process online and it mentioned that after the applications are all scored the top 10% are thrown out along with the bottom 10%. I have heard this rumor several times before and even emailed the admissions office about it last fall. The secretary said that it was obviously untrue because the U would want to accept the best applicants. However, because Dr Samuelason mentioned this in his presentation and because it was the secretary that responded to my email, who may not be informed about these details, I am beginning to wonder if that rumor is true. Can anyone shed some light on this for me?