2014-2015 University of Washington Application Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
BABS, do you know how much is generally gifted to medical students each semester via FAFSA? Is that amount impacted my parents financial info, if you provide it on the application?
Everyone gets offered the same amount, and it doesn't matter what the parental financial info is on there.

http://www.uwmedicine.org/education...dent-affairs/financial-aid/budget-information

Now you can also get a scholarship and grant, which just erases part of the loans. That is worth up to $10k per year and does depend on financial info from your parents, but everyone pretty much gets either $9k or $10k if you submit your FAFSA and scholarship app on time and are a WA resident. From what I hear, other WWAMI states have their own perks but I think everyone qualifies for the scholarships.
 
Last edited:
Everyone gets offered the same amount, and it doesn't matter what the parental financial info is on there.

http://www.uwmedicine.org/education...dent-affairs/financial-aid/budget-information

Now you can also get a scholarship and grant, which just erases part of the loans. That is worth up to $10k per year and does depend on financial info from your parents, but everyone pretty much gets either $9k or $10k if you submit your FAFSA and scholarship app on time and are a WA resident. From what I hear, other WWAMI states have their own perks but I think everyone qualifies for the scholarships.
So the scholarship you're talking about is not available to OOR applicants?
 
So the scholarship you're talking about is not available to OOR applicants?
I said everyone qualifies. Even OOR.

Technically speaking, there are people that don't qualify. Those would be MD/PhD, military and people doing the health service core. However, for those people they have their schooling paid for entirely so a scholarship isn't needed.

And I talked directly with the financial aid office to get this answer so it should be correct.
 
I said everyone qualifies. Even OOR.

Technically speaking, there are people that don't qualify. Those would be MD/PhD, military and people doing the health service core. However, for those people they have their schooling paid for entirely so a scholarship isn't needed.

And I talked directly with the financial aid office to get this answer so it should be correct.
Ah, I was just wondering cause you said they had to be a WA resident. I'll need all the FinAid help I can get. Thanks again for all the info you've been giving us!
 
Ah, I was just wondering cause you said they had to be a WA resident. I'll need all the FinAid help I can get. Thanks again for all the info you've been giving us!
Gotcha. Only WA residents get the grant. Other WWAMI states have their own things. For example, tuition in Montana for first year is about a third of the price at Seattle (but they have other fees they have to do apparently).

Source: http://www.montana.edu/wwami/costsandfa.html

Any real detailed questions about fin aid can be sent directly to the financial aid office.

[email protected]
 
Last edited:
Just got my second SUC - interviewed 1/21... bahhhhhh!!! I just want to know!!
 
I just got my second SUC as well (interviewed 1/21). Does this mean that they reviewed my app and still didn't come to a decision or does it mean they haven't even reviewed my app yet?
 
I just got my second SUC as well (interviewed 1/21). Does this mean that they reviewed my app and still didn't come to a decision or does it mean they haven't even reviewed my app yet?
There's really no way to tell, actually. It just means you're still in the running.
 
First SUC. I'm surprised that they don't make final decisions on applicants this far out. I would imagine that a larger percentage of applicant receive this status in the fall because the final pool is so poorly known at that time. Anyone know what portion of the total interviewed pool that initially receives SUC? I understand that the proportion that is accepted is about a third from the SUC list, but it's heard to glean from that the % of students who initially receive it. I guess I'm just trying to interpret a SUC given this late. Thoughts?

And yes, I realize that all of this obsessing is ultimately pointless.
 
First SUC. I'm surprised that they don't make final decisions on applicants this far out. I would imagine that a larger percentage of applicant receive this status in the fall because the final pool is so poorly known at that time. Anyone know what portion of the total interviewed pool that initially receives SUC? I understand that the proportion that is accepted is about a third from the SUC list, but it's heard to glean from that the % of students who initially receive it. I guess I'm just trying to interpret a SUC given this late. Thoughts?

And yes, I realize that all of this obsessing is ultimately pointless.
They say a good proportion of students receive the SUC notification. Be glad you only have to wait another 2 weeks or so for a final notification. I believe I remember something about 200 students are reviewed mid march for final accept/reject/waitlist. But who knows how accurate my memory is these days with all the waiting and vast amounts of info from schools.
 
They say a good proportion of students receive the SUC notification. Be glad you only have to wait another 2 weeks or so for a final notification. I believe I remember something about 200 students are reviewed mid march for final accept/reject/waitlist. But who knows how accurate my memory is these days with all the waiting and vast amounts of info from schools.

I also see that "Applicants may be placed under consideration because the Executive Committee member representing them was not able to make a particular meeting..."

I guess that makes it pretty meaningless. For all I know, the SUC email is automated to anyone that is post-interview but without a final decision. Does anyone know if emails are sent out IMMEDIATELY after a Excon meeting? Just curious. Sorry if this is fairly well known on this forum... I have admittedly advanced to some of the more recent posts.
 
Last edited:
I also see that "Applicants may be placed under consideration because the Executive Committee member representing them was not able to make a particular meeting..."

I guess that makes it pretty meaningless. For all I know, the SUC email is automated to anyone that is post-interview but without a final decision. Does anyone know if emails are sent out IMMEDIATELY after a Excon meeting? Just curious. Sorry if this is fairly well known on this forum... I had admittedly advanced to the some of the more recent posts.
From how I understand it, they do go out after EXCOM meetings, but that doesn't necessarily mean that all SUC emails were after EXCOM meetings. They could just be regular "keep waiting" emails that many schools send out, especially those that like to pool many applicants and limit the effect of a "rolling admission"
 
First SUC. I'm surprised that they don't make final decisions on applicants this far out. I would imagine that a larger percentage of applicant receive this status in the fall because the final pool is so poorly known at that time. Anyone know what portion of the total interviewed pool that initially receives SUC? I understand that the proportion that is accepted is about a third from the SUC list, but it's heard to glean from that the % of students who initially receive it. I guess I'm just trying to interpret a SUC given this late. Thoughts?

And yes, I realize that all of this obsessing is ultimately pointless.
We'll find out for sure by mid-March. Welcome to the party. I do have to say that it would be pretty heartless of them to flat-out reject those of us who have been SUC for months now. I'd imagine they make a wait list that is much larger than the actual number they anticipate to take off said list.
 
We'll find out for sure by mid-March. Welcome to the party. I do have to say that it would be pretty heartless of them to flat-out reject those of us who have been SUC for months now. I'd imagine they make a wait list that is much larger than the actual number they anticipate to take off said list.
If it's any consolation, I hear the UW wait-list moves quite a bit. I remember seeing a number showing that the number of offers given is nearly double the number that matriculate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it's any consolation, I hear the UW wait-list moves quite a bit. I remember seeing a number showing that the number of offers given is nearly double the number that matriculate.
Here the actual data that I started when I was applying. It was filled out by all the people that were on the waitlist and we could track how the waitlist moved. It will help answer a ton of questions when the waitlist is finally formed.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AjUTO5AJAB7IdFpUVG5SNm50NFRZV0ZxcmtSTTdrTHc&output=html

Unfortunately I do not think anyone decided to do it last year or report what waitlist number UW got to.

But as you can see, the waitlist moves and the biggest movement is around May 15th.
 
I know someone who just got in yesterday off the SUC pool. They interviewed in December...

everytime i feel like i know whats going on it just gets more confusing!
 
Should we wait to send in a letter of intent until the waitlist is made, or is it acceptable to send it in now if we are SUC? I have been SUC since December.
 
Should we wait to send in a letter of intent until the waitlist is made, or is it acceptable to send it in now if we are SUC? I have been SUC since December.
I'm going to send in my letter of intent now so they can consider it when they review my file. I don't think they review any more files when the waitlist is all made up.
 
Here the actual data that I started when I was applying. It was filled out by all the people that were on the waitlist and we could track how the waitlist moved. It will help answer a ton of questions when the waitlist is finally formed.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AjUTO5AJAB7IdFpUVG5SNm50NFRZV0ZxcmtSTTdrTHc&output=html

Unfortunately I do not think anyone decided to do it last year or report what waitlist number UW got to.

But as you can see, the waitlist moves and the biggest movement is around May 15th.
Do you know of any data that has recorded when the wait list was made in previous years?
 
Do you know of any data that has recorded when the wait list was made in previous years?
Check the far right of my google doc. The sources for data are located there. There is one other year where they did a Google doc with waitlist numbers. Unfortunately everything is self reported from SDN forums and a lot of the data was mined from previous posts. However I doubt many people lie in reporting it (or at least I would hope so).
 
Should we wait to send in a letter of intent until the waitlist is made, or is it acceptable to send it in now if we are SUC? I have been SUC since December.
The waitlist is a ranked waitlist and doesn't change once it is made. So if you wait to send in a letter, or update, or anything at all then it will have no impact on your position.
 
The waitlist is a ranked waitlist and doesn't change once it is made. So if you wait to send in a letter, or update, or anything at all then it will have to impact on your position.

it will have an impact or no impact?
 
Well good news for Idaho WWAMI today - the budget was increased by 5 seats by the JFAC (budget setting committee). That would make 35 total for Idaho (w/ 5 TRUST seats). The bill does have to pass through the House and Senate now, but apparently they rarely vote against the JFAC-set budget, if ever.
 
Hi, I'm a 3rd year Alaska WWAMI. Just wanted to drop a note since I remember reading this thread when I was in your shoes. First off congratulations on your wonderful accomplishment if you've already have an acceptance letter, if not no fear -- life works out and there is still a lot of time left in the game. Here are my impressions so far.

+++++'s
Your classmates - top notch people, geniuses that are super-humble, still find time to be outdoorsy, athletic, and go out on the weekends amidst med school craziness. They are easy to make friends with, mostly 22-29yo and not married, WWAMI-region = more married people who are equally awesome. Maybe 5-10% non-trads who are older than 30. Very few, if any gunners. Everyone shares notes for classes, books for boards, hooks it up for housing and research opportunities.
Your attendings - West Coast to the max. Very chill, friendly and forthcoming with teaching points. Almost none of the hierarchy or egotism that is the hallmark of East coast medicine. They have a much more collaborative teaching style that leads to way less stress third year. I once said, "gnarly ulcers found on colonoscopy are the most likely source of bleeding" on formal medicine rounds, and my attending just laughed.
Tuition - UW is the cheapest top-10 medical school. This was a huge factor in my decision, and looking at 180k debt is a different game then 260k+. Remember $1 in loans will take about $3 in income to pay back accounting for cumulative interest and high tax-burden on your physician income. Also if you max out past your Stafford loans, Grad-Plus loans must be taken out an 7.9% interest rate. At UW the tuition is low enough you can stick with maxing out the Stafford loans which have been at 5.41% interest. Saving those percentage points translates into $10,000's of future savings.
Research - Thriving research, abundant access for medical students to on-board with projects while in Seattle. It is the #1 public medical school in NIH funding, second behind Harvard.
Residency - I'm applying to a very competitive specialty and UW is a well-known primary care school (#1 in Primary care 21 out of 22 years in USNWR rankings). So how does this help me? Few of my classmates are gunning for 3rd year honors since most are going primary care and don't need the grades, so it a bit easier to achieve honors here versus other sub-specialty focused schools. Several of my undergrad friends who went to UCSF and USC have told me it takes an act of God to get third-year honors at their schools. In my future specialty you get bonus points in rank formulas if you come from a "top-medical school" which IMO is a little arrogant, but none-the-less, UW rightly counts as a top-tier medical school in all their formulas. If your going primary care from UW you can get any residency in the country w/ the UW name behind you, and there is a ton of institutional support for primary care related activities in the first two years.

+/-'s
Curriculum renewal - UW's first major curriculum overhaul in 15-years. I've looked over all the documents and sat on the curriculum committee's as a student representative. Let me say unequivocally the changes are for the better. Only 1.5 years preclinical leaves much more time for career exploration and research in the later years. The systems based approach is intuitive and the movement away from formal lectures to small-class room learning is the future of education as a whole, so I'm very proud UW is an early adopter. That being said, the first 1-2 years of the transition are going to be a bit of a cluster**** as the professors adopt to a new teaching style and new material -- so be prepared for a bit of upheaval.
Travel - My first year was Anchorage. My second year Seattle. My third year I've moved every 6-weeks from Washington to Alaska to Idaho in a clinical clerkship format we lovingly call "The Safari." I've actually enjoyed my varied experiences and practicing medicine in different environments since it gives me a better idea of what type of city size I want to practice in as a doctor. However no doubt the travel is disruptive to a routine. In the new curriculum you will be at the first 1.5 years at your home site, and traveling the last 2.5 years, so there will be slightly less moving.

No real straight-up negatives. Going to UW for medical school is honestly the best choice of my life. If there any questions I can answer let me know. Any other UWer's lurking on this thread, feel free to chip in if your experiences have been the same or different.
 
Hi, I'm a 3rd year Alaska WWAMI. Just wanted to drop a note since I remember reading this thread when I was in your shoes. First off congratulations on your wonderful accomplishment if you've already have an acceptance letter, if not no fear -- life works out and there is still a lot of time left in the game. Here are my impressions so far.

+++++'s
Your classmates - top notch people, geniuses that are super-humble, still find time to be outdoorsy, athletic, and go out on the weekends amidst med school craziness. They are easy to make friends with, mostly 22-29yo and not married, WWAMI-region = more married people who are equally awesome. Maybe 5-10% non-trads who are older than 30. Very few, if any gunners. Everyone shares notes for classes, books for boards, hooks it up for housing and research opportunities.
Your attendings - West Coast to the max. Very chill, friendly and forthcoming with teaching points. Almost none of the hierarchy or egotism that is the hallmark of East coast medicine. They have a much more collaborative teaching style that leads to way less stress third year. I once said, "gnarly ulcers found on colonoscopy are the most likely source of bleeding" on formal medicine rounds, and my attending just laughed.
Tuition - UW is the cheapest top-10 medical school. This was a huge factor in my decision, and looking at 180k debt is a different game then 260k+. Remember $1 in loans will take about $3 in income to pay back accounting for cumulative interest and high tax-burden on your physician income. Also if you max out past your Stafford loans, Grad-Plus loans must be taken out an 7.9% interest rate. At UW the tuition is low enough you can stick with maxing out the Stafford loans which have been at 5.41% interest. Saving those percentage points translates into $10,000's of future savings.
Research - Thriving research, abundant access for medical students to on-board with projects while in Seattle. It is the #1 public medical school in NIH funding, second behind Harvard.
Residency - I'm applying to a very competitive specialty and UW is a well-known primary care school (#1 in Primary care 21 out of 22 years in USNWR rankings). So how does this help me? Few of my classmates are gunning for 3rd year honors since most are going primary care and don't need the grades, so it a bit easier to achieve honors here versus other sub-specialty focused schools. Several of my undergrad friends who went to UCSF and USC have told me it takes an act of God to get third-year honors at their schools. In my future specialty you get bonus points in rank formulas if you come from a "top-medical school" which IMO is a little arrogant, but none-the-less, UW rightly counts as a top-tier medical school in all their formulas. If your going primary care from UW you can get any residency in the country w/ the UW name behind you, and there is a ton of institutional support for primary care related activities in the first two years.

+/-'s
Curriculum renewal - UW's first major curriculum overhaul in 15-years. I've looked over all the documents and sat on the curriculum committee's as a student representative. Let me say unequivocally the changes are for the better. Only 1.5 years preclinical leaves much more time for career exploration and research in the later years. The systems based approach is intuitive and the movement away from formal lectures to small-class room learning is the future of education as a whole, so I'm very proud UW is an early adopter. That being said, the first 1-2 years of the transition are going to be a bit of a cluster**** as the professors adopt to a new teaching style and new material -- so be prepared for a bit of upheaval.
Travel - My first year was Anchorage. My second year Seattle. My third year I've moved every 6-weeks from Washington to Alaska to Idaho in a clinical clerkship format we lovingly call "The Safari." I've actually enjoyed my varied experiences and practicing medicine in different environments since it gives me a better idea of what type of city size I want to practice in as a doctor. However no doubt the travel is disruptive to a routine. In the new curriculum you will be at the first 1.5 years at your home site, and traveling the last 2.5 years, so there will be slightly less moving.

No real straight-up negatives. Going to UW for medical school is honestly the best choice of my life. If there any questions I can answer let me know. Any other UWer's lurking on this thread, feel free to chip in if your experiences have been the same or different.

Thanks for the write-up! It's making me even more psyched to begin and also more antsy with the waiting.
 
Does anyone know if we were UW undergrads if we need to make a new email/net ID ? Or can we use the same one?
 
Does anyone know if we were UW undergrads if we need to make a new email/net ID ? Or can we use the same one?
It will likely be the same. All my information carried over when I started a new job here, even after 3 years since my previous position here.
 
Oh - I meant to write this last week when I got my second SUC.

I know of someone that was interviewed after me that got rejected on the same day that I got my 2nd SUC (2/26). So at least we know that they ARE indeed making some decisions and those of us that have gotten SUC's are actually being looked at.

And I do think that we will all know their final verdict in ~2 weeks. I have a feeling they are doing the 3 day SUC accept/reject/alt list next week... AHH!!! I just wanna know!!!
 
Oh - I meant to write this last week when I got my second SUC.

I know of someone that was interviewed after me that got rejected on the same day that I got my 2nd SUC (2/26). So at least we know that they ARE indeed making some decisions and those of us that have gotten SUC's are actually being looked at.

And I do think that we will all know their final verdict in ~2 weeks. I have a feeling they are doing the 3 day SUC accept/reject/alt list next week... AHH!!! I just wanna know!!!

Good to know that there is still a "bottom of the pile." :-/
 
Not bottom necessarily... Middle would be more accurate since SUC isn't an automatic rejection. Glass half full.

Right. I think we're just saying the same thing in different ways. When you get a SUC and they are actually actively handing out rejects, it means there is a bottom, and you're thankfully not (yet?) there.
 
Any idea on when the final excom meeting is? Interviewed friday and was told next week, anyone have something more specific?
 
Any idea on when the final excom meeting is? Interviewed friday and was told next week, anyone have something more specific?
I'm not sure of the specific date of the EXCOM meeting, but I do know that today is the last interview day of the season (unless they plan on adding another day randomly, but I doubt that will happen).
 
Any idea on when the final excom meeting is? Interviewed friday and was told next week, anyone have something more specific?
You interviewed the 27th and were told you'd hear back this week? Or that the final meeting would be this week?
 
You interviewed the 27th and were told you'd hear back this week? Or that the final meeting would be this week?
Sorry for any miscommunication, on Friday, I was told that our applications would be discussed during the final ex-comm meet held during the week of the 9th. In addition, we were told that the final interviews would be held this week for Idaho. My only intention was to find out if anyone knew of how the final ex-comm meetings worked. From earlier threads (last year), I saw that there are 3 final-excomm meetings, so wanted to know if anyone had extra info? Hang in there! I know the wait's been long, longer for some than others, but it'll be over soon. Deep breaths 🙂
 
Last edited:
Hey everyone, i just interviewed today as an Idaho applicant and for all applicants, they said that the final decision should come out 2 weeks from now.

For Idaho applicants they told us that they have interviewed 50 applicants and this week there was 21 (so a total of 71) and so far they have accepted 14 applicants. Also they are hoping that by the end of next week the house and senate should pass the budget to increase the number of Idaho seats from 30 to 35. I hope this information is helpful!
 
Sorry for any miscommunication, on Friday, I was told that our applications would be discussed during the final ex-comm meet held during the week of the 9th. In addition, we were told that the final interviews would be held this week for Idaho. My only intention was to find out if anyone knew of how the final ex-comm meetings worked. From earlier threads (last year), I saw that there are 3 final-excomm meetings, so wanted to know if anyone had extra info? Hang in there! I know the wait's been long, longer for some than others, but it'll be over soon. Deep breaths 🙂

as I said earlier in the thread, for the final 3-day meeting, they will reject some, accept some, and the rest got put on a ranked wait list. Last year, they met the week of March 10 and decisions came out via email March 14. Usually the top 30s will most likely be getting in over the next few months. If anyone has anything to update at the last minute, its best to send it in asap, as the final meetings are coming up.

to all those who are still waiting to hear back, hang in there everyone! I was in your shoes last year and know how stressful it can get. Best of luck!!!
 
Just what I needed for my spring break...
Seriously!! I was just saying to someone today that this quarter's finals week (in two weeks) will be awful - I will either be elated that I got in and therefore unable to study or terribly sad that I got rejected .. and therefore unable to study.. Lame timing!!!
 
Top