Yes I was wondering if there were any after that
Yup I interviewed here on 1/8/16.
Yes I was wondering if there were any after that
Every interview group has a unique set of applicants, I would imagine the number they accept varies from group to group with no definite number. Overall, they have a 50-60% acceptance rate post interview, so your chances are pretty good here compared to other schools.Anyone know if they accept a certain number of applicants from each interview date? If so, how many?
Same boat...Does anyone know when they schedule interviews until? And is there a way to get a status update? Complete 9/25 and still waiting 🙁
Does anyone know when they schedule interviews until? And is there a way to get a status update? Complete 9/25 and still waiting 🙁
Just got rejected pre II. Submitted secondary very late
So sorry to hear that...do you mind if i ask you when were you complete? I submitted late as well
pre-II hold just now... any idea what this could mean?
You're right, Flint's about 45 minutes away. We actually have been organizing a few things since we've been back, and it's been completely student-organized so far, which is awesome.
I'm not involved with the planning, so that's all I know, but there are a handful of people who have been really active in figuring out how we can help. Many OUWB students have been closely following the issue and a ton have volunteered their time and money to lend a hand wherever possible.
- We're collecting bottled water to donate, though we're hearing that particular need is close to being met through gov't assistance, charities, other donations, etc. We are trying to find local organizations that are in greatest need to donate what we have. For instance, there is a church that is distributing water to undocumented immigrants, who are often hesitant to go to larger charities or government organizations for help.
- We're hoping to fundraise and donate to a local or national organization that's helping with the crisis. We're trying to set it up officially through the OU and Beaumont administration so that we can collect donations from the university/hospital and get donations from more than just OUWB students. There's a bit of red tape with that, which is taking some time to get through.
- We have several days planned over the next few months where groups of students will be going up to Flint for the day and volunteering with the Red Cross to help put together water testing kits and go door-to-door to distribute water, assess needs of families, etc.
- There has also been some talk of putting together some kind of educational handout or program for Flint residents about lead poisoning, water safety, etc. if there is a need. Haven't heard any specific plans for this yet.
That is awesome. Good for the students! But I admit I am curious why the administration hasn't gotten more involved, cleared the red tape, etc..? Seems like a perfect opportunity for the school to raise public awareness of its place in the community while doing some good. But I'm sure the reasons are significant too.That is awesome! Also, great question Pageantry!
Oh thanks, that's good to hear. Would you please keep us posted about this? Someone sent me that terrible New Yorker article about L. Brooks Patterson ("Drop Dead, Detroit!") and it made me nervous that Oakland County in general might not care too much about the poor. The Flint situation is just awful, but it's great to get to see OUWB show what it's really made of.Based on my limited involvement with the planning, the administration seems to be doing everything they can to support us. I know Dean Grabowski has been helpful in providing some information and ideas to us in the Facebook conversation we've all been having, and students have been working with a few other administrators you all probably haven't met yet. When I say it's taking a while to set up the fundraiser, I just mean it's something we weren't able to do immediately, like we were with collecting water and signing up to volunteer. We have only been back to school for about three weeks and just got these ideas rolling a week or two ago. I don't mean to imply that administrators have been sitting on this for months for no good reason or anything like that.
I pretty much grew up in Michigan, and L. Brooks Patterson is one of the biggest Republicans there is. Oakland County is a very red county in a blue state, Patterson probably one of Snyder's (the Governors) cronies. All the auto executives live in Oakland County, so this is suburbia at its finest. Beaumont Hospital is is Royal Oak, which is more middle class than Rochester, where Oakland University.Oh thanks, that's good to hear. Would you please keep us posted about this? Someone sent me that terrible New Yorker article about L. Brooks Patterson ("Drop Dead, Detroit!") and it made me nervous that Oakland County in general might not care too much about the poor. The Flint situation is just awful, but it's great to get to see OUWB show what it's really made of.
Well, Rick Snyder is really not that bad for a Republican (and I'm a card carrying Democrat). He sort of got caught on this one by the incompetence of his administration (and the need to help out a lot of communities/school systems and cities that are nearly bankrupt). He inherited a lot of problems. However, that his admin sort of swept the problems under the carpet, for people who are disenfranchised, is his undoing. We had 8 years of Granholm (a Democrat) before Snyder, and she wasn't able to solve some of the systemic problems in Michigan (a previously strong union state with a lot of employee legacy costs at the school/local and state level). Only the car companies were able to shed their legacy costs by going bankrupt. We are not letting our schools/cities do the same thing as the car companies, because the federal government won't back stop it. This problem is decades in the making, and won't be solved any time soon.I've been following all this stuff very closely because I have a lot of friends from Michigan, hence why I applied. But, tbh, hearing that Michiganders elected someone like that (two terms!) and then learning about just how egregious the socioeconomic disparities are across county lines has really made me nervous about going to what otherwise seems like a great school.
Would a doctor who cares about the poor be supported... or scorned, Patterson-style? And can a person feel safe living in a state that does things like that to its impoverished citizens? Can a person in an unaffected county feel confident that their tuition and energy isn't fundamentally supporting a system of egregious inequality? This is why knowing if the school is actively responding is important to me, because it reflects the culture of the administration, and thus the culture of the school in general.
I don't mean to be a buzzkill. I truly appreciate your thoughts on all this, both of you.
I sort of chuckle about thinking of Michigan and our inequality as truly different than most other states, but I think Texas is a truly scary state. Some of Texas Republican Policies disenfranchise women, children, immigrants, poor, minorities, etc. Not sure what state doesn't have vast inequalities, unless you count ND or Wy, which have very sparse, homogenous populations. Afraid my politics are showing.I've been following all this stuff very closely because I have a lot of friends from Michigan, hence why I applied. But, tbh, hearing that Michiganders elected someone like that (two terms!) and then learning about just how egregious the socioeconomic disparities are across county lines has really made me nervous about going to what otherwise seems like a great school.
Would a doctor who cares about the poor be supported... or scorned, Patterson-style? And can a person feel safe living in a state that does things like that to its impoverished citizens? Can a person in an unaffected county feel confident that their tuition and energy isn't fundamentally supporting a system of egregious inequality? This is why knowing if the school is actively responding is important to me, because it reflects the culture of the administration, and thus the culture of the school in general.
I don't mean to be a buzzkill. I truly appreciate your thoughts on all this, both of you.
Do you feel like if you study/practice there you'll have the support you'd want to (learn to) do so in the way you'd want (as a Democrat)?Well, Rick Snyder is really not that bad for a Republican (and I'm a card carrying Democrat). He sort of got caught on this one by the incompetence of his administration (and the need to help out a lot of communities/school systems and cities that are nearly bankrupt). He inherited a lot of problems. However, that his admin sort of swept the problems under the carpet, for people who are disenfranchised, is his undoing. We had 8 years of Granholm (a Democrat) before Snyder, and she wasn't able to solve some of the systemic problems in Michigan (a previously strong union state with a lot of employee legacy costs at the school/local and state level). Only the car companies were able to shed their legacy costs by going bankrupt. We are not letting our schools/cities do the same thing as the car companies, because the federal government won't back stop it. This problem is decades in the making, and won't be solved any time soon.
I think people who work in hospitals and actually treat the poor have a different attitude than the people living in the affluent areas (which are self segregated).Do you feel like if you study/practice there you'll have the support you'd want to (learn to) do so in the way you'd want (as a Democrat)?
I have lived, in my life, in California, Canada, and NYC, which all have their problems, but are all decidedly populist. I really have no idea how living in all that red would affect training in the practice of medicine, but it feels like it would have to? I just don't know how.
Granted, I do hear that all of us do-gooders end up going into plastic surgery in Miami in the end, so maybe it's a moot point.
Anyone know when the last interview date is?
Merci beaucoup!Just answered you in my post almost immediately after yours
Are people hearing back already? The twitter page has not updated stating they are making callsHas anyone who interviewed on 1/8/16 heard back today?
From my experience, there's like a several hour delay until their tweets become "visible"... E.g. 2 weeks ago, I didn't see their tweets posted around 3 pm until 6 pm.. And I was refreshing every hour.Are people hearing back already? The twitter page has not updated stating they are making calls
When were you complete?I just received an II.
The two interview dates available are Feb. 19 and March 4. @childofmercy
Edit: Feb 12 just opened up too.
From my experience, there's like a several hour delay until their tweets become "visible"... E.g. 2 weeks ago, I didn't see their tweets posted around 3 pm until 6 pm.. And I was refreshing every hour.
Ah that clarifies so much, thank you =)I think it shows PST time no matter where you are viewing from or where it is posted.
Haven't seen any waitlists or rejections yet. They say you're still in the running if you haven't received a decision yet, but I find it hard to believe that they have waitlisted zero people at this point in the cycle.Does OUWB only give out acceptances after these meetings? What about waitlists or rejections? I was going to withdraw my app post-interview, but I was curious what they would decide even though I know this school isn't a good fit for me.
Haven't seen any waitlists or rejections yet. They say you're still in the running if you haven't received a decision yet, but I find it hard to believe that they have waitlisted zero people at this point in the cycle.
Maybe just sour grapes, but I find it pretty un-transparent of them to not let people know they've been waitlisted after so long. I understand that they may be unsure of how to stack applicants into tiers without interviewing everyone, but it seems contrary to their admissions mantra to string applicants along and tell them they're still in the running when they've clearly been waitlisted or rejected.
/2 cents
There have been plenty of rejections, including a few on this page alone. The waitlist is not formulated until March or so, so it makes sense that nobody has been waitlisted yet. The admissions folks definitely mention this multiple times at interview days (I know they did for mine when they were talking about letters of intent and app updates). I think it's a pretty fair system, and I don't really see how that's stringing people along. If they have no interest, then they reject you. If not, you're still in the running. Once they formulate the waitlist, they will tell you what tier you are in.
How is it any different from other schools, other than the fact that some schools have a continual waitlist? I would argue that you have just as little of an idea of where you stand when being waitlisted at school X, because you have no idea if you actually have a real shot at getting off the waitlist or not. OUWB (or any other school, really) has nothing to gain by telling you that you're in the running when in fact you're not. Which is why they (and pretty much every other school out there) will send out a rejection if you are no longer being considered. If not, you still have a shot.
@fhexhockey @MatthewDamon @dexmedetomidine212
Here is what a school official posted on the OUWB Admissions Twitter account in response to your questions and concerns, in case you didn't see it: