CHOOSE YOUR OWWN II - Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Though cubs, stagg, wonder, and alley have all been around since chaos asked about alignment cards, so. Hmm.

I'm a little weirded out by wonder making that whole post about analyzing the discards and somehow forgetting how this game was structured. Now, of course either town or scum is going to know that information, but it seems to me that town actually trying to solve the game would be less likely to forget. Town mindset is solving, scum mindset is looking like solving. Hopefully that makes sense, I haven't had my coffee yet.

yeet wonder
Interesting point. How do you feel about the content of the analysis she did, if you put aside the forgetting the game structure for a moment?

I was leaning town on her last night, but on reread this morning, I'm keeping this in mind. I also didn't love that her POE was 2 people who are generally low-hanging fruit for easy misyeets, but I'm not sure that she's played with either of them before.
 
alley - Town Nymphomaniac : understandably discarded because who wants to willingly be lovers with someone
@alleycat03 If you were given the choice of vanilla townie or town nymphomaniac for affiliation, is there a reason you chose vanilla townie for your affiliation over town nymphomaniac if both options would have given you town affiliation?
@WonderingStudent, can you explain your thought process from the top comment to the bottom one? You went from saying the nympho was an understandable discard to questioning why she wouldn't have used it for aff, but her discard and claimed aff role are both the same aff anyway, so why did you ask this?
 
Though cubs, stagg, wonder, and alley have all been around since chaos asked about alignment cards, so. Hmm.

I'm a little weirded out by wonder making that whole post about analyzing the discards and somehow forgetting how this game was structured. Now, of course either town or scum is going to know that information, but it seems to me that town actually trying to solve the game would be less likely to forget. Town mindset is solving, scum mindset is looking like solving. Hopefully that makes sense, I haven't had my coffee yet.

yeet wonder

This is a good point actually.

You have my sheep.
Unvote sunshine , vote wonder.

I find discard analysis in these sort of games in general to be scummy bc thats a low hanging fruit for scum to center their discussion upon , but Wonder was being elaborate so it didnt ping me as anything much earler.

Keep in mind tho , this is a multiball setup and scum has to solve the game too.

Ive added alley's alignment to the list
 
I reread the thread and pulled a couple of quotes that stuck out to me for various reasons.

I liked this whole exchange with Zenge, Cray, and Dubz. One of Zenge's quotes poofed when I inserted them in here, but I'll type out what I noted about it.
Idk if I agree with this, at least with Chaos and Please.

Strongman and Ninja are very powerful roles for a scum faction to have.

Could they have gotten something even better? Sure it’s possible. It just seems more likely that they’d pick village roles than they got even better scum roles.

Especially when you break down the dual selection consideration.
Assuming they picked scum, then their other two roles would have to include a PR that’s even better for scum than these, and include another scum affiliation for the affiliation choice.

Seems like a lot to bank on when the more likely answer is just that they picked village roles.
The logic here makes sense to me, and doesn't feel stretchy. Zenge has a quote after this (the one I lost) where he talks specifically about pleasy, and how her mafia strongman discard makes it seem like she's more likely to be village, knowing her preferences. I agree with that assessment, but I also agree with Cray's point below - that scum could have been her only options.
S
See, I wouldn't go that far because maybe she only had scum to choose from.

All I know if that if someone discards town, they could have been town is the only thing confirmed. So for them to be scum means I have to believe they would have discarded the town role to be scum. That's usually only going to be likely if a few things are true for that player.

OTOH, discarding scum tells me very little about alignment imho.

I say this because my first roll was only between town options, and my second was only between scum options, and my third only between town again.
All I'm saying is that to think someone discarded a town role and is scum, means either that town role seriously blew more than a scum role in that person's estimation, or if the town discard looks decent, they had something better to pick from in their estimation. So then you need to decide, would they consider some scum roles preferable to the town role discarded?

I'm not saying a scum role discard is particularly illuminating, but isn't it simple logic that the only way to believe someone who discarded town is scum, is to believe they would pick scum over town? If you don't think so, then it does more to support they're town.
Ehhhh

If you're looking at this as someone discarded a town affiliation we do not know what abilities they had available to match up with that affiliation. So we don't know if their town option "looked decent" because in a world there that was their only town card, if they chose it they would not be able to use the corresponding ability. So it's not "would they consider some scum roles preferable" to the discard that we see, it's would they consider some scum roles (which is a wide range of stuff here) better than a town role with whatever ability options they had. Which is like. Impossible to even try to parse out. Does anyone really hate being scum enough to choose to be town with a harmful ability (again I haven't looked at the whole list yet but I'm sure such things exist)? I'm not gonna bank on that.
Dubz's contribution at the end here makes sense to me too - it is difficult to tease out what people might have done since we were picking fragments of each role, not the entire role.


General note for everyone: Remember that there are multiple scum factions so even if someone has good reads and caught us a wolf, doesn’t mean they aren’t an alien.
This pinged me. It's a valid point to make, but at the same time, it feels like preemptively trying to prevent building a village bloc, and I don't like that feeling at all.

I'd like to wait for Wonder to answer the question I asked her, but I think that's where my vote will be going today.
 
Players that have pinged me so far:

Vis -


Seems strange that you worded the first post as if you strongly knew stagg’s preference for ww roles then in the second post after being questioned made your knowledge of stagg sound different especially since you haven’t seemed to play with him prior


Alley:
A lot of fluff (note: I haven’t really played with alley so I don’t know how they normally sound)
Examples -



Also their stagg vote felt off - overexplaining


Also if scum, went the “safe” affiliation route by claiming vanilla townie

@alleycat03 If you were given the choice of vanilla townie or town nymphomaniac for affiliation, is there a reason you chose vanilla townie for your affiliation over town nymphomaniac if both options would have given you town affiliation?

For now:
Vote alley
I guess this was the post that pinged me most for wondering.

It’s hard because on the one hand the points being made are fine, but on the other Alley and Vis are both generally on the more sketchy side. So pushing them feels like pushing easy misyeet bait. It’s a bit of a double edged sword.

I get that theres a very twisted logic about that. That pushing to yeet sketchy players is itself sketchy, but it does often tend to be the case that scum loves to go for low hanging fruit, so it does ping me when people push certain people out of the gate.

I’m not going to vote here just yet, I want to see how the day plays out, but I wanted to get down my thoughts on wondering since there seems to be some momentum building there.
 
She is not wrong about the last point tho. Try to build non-mafia , non-ww blocks rather than town blocs
 
She is not wrong about the last point tho. Try to build non-mafia , non-ww blocks rather than town blocs
Yeah, I mean, I understand it the point she's making. I watched it play out in Flush's last game, where Zenge was mafia and killed a wolf. It just felt a little dismissive of building a bloc when I reread the thread. By itself, it wouldn't have pinged me, but in combination with other posts she'd made, it didn't feel great.

This is my first multiball game, does it show? 😆
 
Day 1 Yeet Tally
alley (2) - cubs, Wonder
Stagg (2) - Vis, alley
Cray (1) - Stagg
Vis () -
sunshine () -
Wonder (2) - dubz, Chaos

7/14
yeet close in ~10.5 hours
 
Um, what statements? About how bummed I was the roll with vanilla townie didn't stick?

How does discarding vanilla townie make me scum? If anything, you all should realize there's no way I discarded vanilla townie to be scum. So think again.

Did you understand how you were choosing your role? (Legit question)

So we all got 3 roles, right, and you had to discard 1, use 1 for alignment, and then use 1 for ability.

So say for example (PURELY AN EXAMPLE, THIS IS NOT A CLAIM), I got vanilla town, town vig, and hirsute town. I’d submit something like “discard hirsute town, use vanilla town for aff, use town vig for ability.” Or something similar. With the end result being that I was a town-aligned vig.

At least that’s how I approached it and I ended up with the aff/ability I intended.

Oh, well that’s not what I thought was going on. I thought we had to pick one role to publicly discard, Got to pick any one the 3 roles for affiliation, and then had to just pick from one of the two remaining abilities. Idk why I thought this, but I think I confused the mods with my choices as much as I was confused about how to pick my role :depressed:
 
I have a bunch of appointments this afternoon, so posting my early reads list now. I don't know what to expect for the balance in terms of number of scum in a game like this. Will obviously continue re-evaluating as the day goes on. I did tl;dr so the people who hate wall posts don't have to look at my explanations, but the spoilers have explanations for each read in them.

Town leans: chaos, Vis
Town lean:
Chaos - I don't see a way that asking people to reveal their aff role would help scum out, but I do see how it could be beneficial to town for catching scum slips down the road. It felt pro-village to me. The wording he used at first was confusing, but I didn't feel like it was intended to be - it just didn't come out clearly at first.
Vis - didn't like how she wanted to lean on discard analysis, but I get it because there's not much to go off of yet. I thought she raised some good points, like about what aff would be more likely to keep/discard roles like strongman and ninja. The immediate vote for Stagg, when AFAIK she's never played a game where Stagg was scum, felt a little weird. Most of her interactions with Chaos felt v/v to me. She's at least trying to keep discussion going.

Neutrals: Zenge, cubs, Cray, pleasy, Dina, alley, Stagg
Neutrals (somewhat ordered):
Zenge - feels vaguely village to me right now with his logic, but I'm unwilling to move Zenge out of neutral on D1. He's gotten too good at replicating his village tone for me to be comfortable village leaning him on D1.
cubs - I'm getting similar vibes to RvB in how cubs is playing. From my limited experience of watching his play in Madagascar and RvB, he feels more ... emotional? I guess? when he's village. I felt like when he was wolfing, he came in very confident and stayed pretty cool. His frustration in RvB felt pretty genuine, and I get similar vibes from his confusion at what Chaos was doing with asking people to reveal their affiliation roles. There is the caveat that cubs was subbing into the middle of a game when I saw him wolf, and I've only seen him play in those 2 games, so this is primarily a tone read for now. I would like to know his aff role though.
Cray - squarely neutral for now. I get my best reads of Cray through watching her interactions with other people, and D1 is generally too early for that. She hasn't done anything that's pinged me as wolfy so far.

please - I have a hard time imagining that please would willingly pick scum. She discarded a powerful scum role, and while that doesn't discount that she may have only had scum options, she's invested enough in playing a good game for her team that I think she would have kept a powerful role like that if she HAD to be scum. She only has 5 posts at the moment though, so not a lot of info to go on.
Dina - only has 5 posts so far. Need more to come to a read on her.
alley - alley is tough for me to read. She feels kind of like village!alley to me, but I feel like in more recent games where she was village, I saw more wolf hunting from her than I feel like I'm seeing right now. Going back through her posts, many of them are either fluff or talking about herself, but there isn't a lot of analysis about other people other than a sentence here and there. I wouldn't put my vote here today, but I want to see more content from her.
Stagg - definitely need to see more. Only 8 posts, not much content. I've found Stagg challenging to read in other games that I've watched (and we played in 1 together for like 12 hours before I subbed out), so he's another one where I wouldn't be willing to put my vote there today. I need to see more before then.

Scum leans: Wonder, Dubz, Coop
Scum leans:
Wonder - see previous posts that I made. I think Dubz raised a good point about the trying to look like gamesolving without really gamesolving, and there have been a couple things that have pinged me that I already talked about.

Splitting this because I won't vote for the following people today since they just modded, but I'm not going to leave them out of my analysis either.

Dubz - I feel a little better about Dubz today than I did yesterday, but not good enough to take her out of my POE for now. Yesterday, I felt like she was making some efforts to shut down discussion - and while I agree that analyzing discards is probably not the best use of time given how many role options there are vs how few people are in the game, she didn't really make any effort to steer the discussion in a different direction, just to shut it down. However, her post this morning on Wonder felt a little more like trying to gamesolve. I don't love that if I put my vote on Wonder, I'll be voting alongside another scum lean, but because there are so many possible factions in this game, I'm not going to read into that too much. The only conclusion I can really draw from this about Dubz, if Wonder flips some sort of scum, is that they're very unlikely to be the same faction, since Dubz isn't a habitual busser.
Coop - fishy fishy, make a wishy. The "I'm so terrible at this game" and "I didn't understand how the roles worked, I had to do it 8 times!" thing feels overdone and very weird to me. I didn't fully understand how the role selection worked in the first roll either, but we had 3 rolls to figure it out, and if it was so confusing, why not ask the mods for clarification? And actually, although this might sound weird, her reaction when I called out her fishing didn't feel super village to me either because she immediately backed down. IME, when a villager thinks they're onto something, they keep pushing it if they meet a little resistance.


I'm intending to vote Coop tomorrow unless there's some big change today.

sunny hasn't posted yet so obviously no read on her.
 
@Chaostrodon

So the language has been screwing me up and confusing me. Normally when we talk about “role” it’s a character or non-consistent thing. Like last game my alignment was village, my ability was seer, and my role was Donut (character from Red Vs blue). Calling a vig/vanilla/whatever ability a “role” was throwing me off.

I was assuming for his game that role = affiliation + ability. But it looks like ability and role are being used interchangeably?

I guess with the understanding from my previous post and above I got my affiliation from town vanilla. Although I though I was just picking the role (aff + ability) that I actually have now.
 
@Chaostrodon

So the language has been screwing me up and confusing me. Normally when we talk about “role” it’s a character or non-consistent thing. Like last game my alignment was village, my ability was seer, and my role was Donut (character from Red Vs blue). Calling a vig/vanilla/whatever ability a “role” was throwing me off.

I was assuming for his game that role = affiliation + ability. But it looks like ability and role are being used interchangeably?

I guess with the understanding from my previous post and above I got my affiliation from town vanilla. Although I though I was just picking the role (aff + ability) that I actually have now.

No , you would had to pick two choices. And if Im reading this correctly it seems you think you get your role + alignment both from the same choice.

Thats not how it works , you get the alignment of the other role that you pick. If it were town you would be town , and if it were ww , it would be ww.
So you say the other role was Vanilla Townie?
 
If you pick Town Doctor for role and Alien Mass Redirector for alignment , your actual ingame role would be Alien Doctor , for instance
 
No , you would had to pick two choices. And if Im reading this correctly it seems you think you get your role + alignment both from the same choice.

Thats not how it works , you get the alignment of the other role that you pick. If it were town you would be town , and if it were ww , it would be ww.
So you say the other role was Vanilla Townie?

Yes, I realize that now but did not realize that when I was picking. So yes, the ability I picked with my affiliation was town vanilla.

And calling abilities roles may get confusing as roles typically mean something very different on this site, so may be the source of the confusion many of us are having.
 
I'm assuming it's so quiet right now because everyone is at work, but it would be nice to get some discussion (beyond this whole thing about how roles were chosen) from people, particularly from those who haven't posted much. I know at least some of them won't be on until later, but they'll see the ping then.

@Zenge142 @WonderingStudent @Dinashadow @vetschoolsletmeinplease, you all have <10 posts at this point. Care to share any feels?
@Stagg737 and @alleycat03, any thoughts on the game so far?

@sunshinefl?
 
supershorty- Village lean. Her recent posts feel very village. I have a hard time believing she would willingly pick a scum role. She loves vanilla villager so I could see her picking a PR or vanilla townie but I definitely have a hard time imagining that she would pick a scum role (especially since she discarded a village role, so she could have been village affiliation with the discard).

Crayola227- neutral. Liked our earlier discussion and her thread contributions.

vetschoolsletmeinplease- neutral, slight village lean. So far, sounds like her village tone. Haven’t seen a whole lot from her but she is another person who I would be SHOCKED if she willingly chose to be (edit: scum/NOT) village.

Viscernable- neutral. She was very analytical with the discards earlier, and I followed her logic there. Also, when she and chaos kind of got into a disagreement, her tone sounded genuine. I think she’s a very strong wolf and I could see her picking a scum affiliation.

sunshinefl- MIA

WildZoo- neutral. I think she would pick 3P if she had a choice, and she’s so good at wolfing that she’d actually be a great scum choice. Haven’t noticed a lot from her tone wise, but she sounds identical to me when she’s wolfing and when she’s village.

Stagg737- wolf-lean. The whole “I forgot to pick” and not understanding the role selection seemed legit, but I agree with shorty that he had plenty of opportunities to ask for clarification. I fully admit that I suck at reading him, so I’m probably biased because I always think he’s sketchy.

Zenge142- Neutral, slight village lean. He sounds village so far, but his early defense of me from the salt votes felt kind of like pocketing. He’s a terrifying wolf player, but right now I do like his contributions and he seems pro-village.

Dinashadow- Neutral. I need to see more, but I find myself nodding along with her posts and agreeing with her logic. Thought her Cubs vote makes sense.

Coopah- neutral, leaning wolf. Her frustration seems genuine, so maybe she truly didn’t pick her role. As far as I know I’ve never played with her before. She’s on the same level as Stagg right now when it comes to me not fully understanding what/why she was so confused.

WonderingStudent- wolf-lean. I get sketchy vibes from her. At first I appreciated the analysis she gave of the discards, but it seems like she is being purposely confusing and I get why Dubz and shorty have said she’s sus.

Chaostrodon- neutral, village-leaning. If he’s scum, he’s an incredibly bold scum considering he claimed an affiliation role that only 1 person could have. Maybe he’s a wolf/mafia vig or something (and he used the vig for ability and not for affiliation) but that also seems way too bold/risky.

cubsrule4e- neutral. my judgement is semi-clouded right now because of his saltiness directed towards me, but I think he has more of a village tone. He seems more upbeat and playful? Like as opposed to the serious vibes I got from him during Madagascar.
 
Last edited:
There’s not a *ton* of info to work off of right now even though we don’t have a lot of time left before yeet deadline. I’m going to stick with my Stagg vote for now, but that might change if a lot of discussion happens in the next few hours.
 
... ok I know I didn't read the end of the last game but I'm assuming that's what this butthurt is?

What the hell is a town nymphomaniac??? Because it sounds dirty 😏
Coops’s entrance felt kind of forced-casual to me, looks like could be trying to cover nerves.
Apparently not alley. So there's one of her possible 3 chances at town gone.
This shade was weird imo

Also coop. Sus.

She edited from "too many P's" to "too many Ps and Hs." Not sure if that was before or after I said she has to go by Coo now lol.
1) The editing and then explanation for the editing also looks like wolfy start-of-game nerves 2) I don’t feel cubs and coop are in the same faction, too much interaction straight out the gate
For example why'd you turn down town roleblocker?
Like shorty said, the fishing is worrying me
Dont worry. Stagg will be yeeted after you.
Do not like. Why have you decided who you’re yeeting D2 with so few posts? Yes, I know this is a joke, but it feels like there’s some level of sincerity to it, plus flippancy about deciding who to vote.
Vote Cray

Interesting discard given pre-game statements
This reasoning is just a stretch imo. I know Stagg didn’t understand 100% how roles were chosen, but he did understand that you choose to combine the role from one card with the affiliation from another, so he shouldn’t think this discard is that weird (since there are indeed a lot of ways someone could choose a vanilla town role). Maybe fishing for cray to justify her choice in a way that would hint at role.
yeet cubs

His confusion and reluctance to reveal his aff role is feeling manufactured to me

I'm at work for most of today so I'll be on later
How do you feel about Wondering and Coops?
 
If he’s scum, he’s an incredibly bold scum considering he claimed an affiliation role that only 1 person could have.
I mean, I’ve gone back and forth about it. Not Chaos specifically, I am getting village vibes from him.

But the idea in general of choosing a 1x affiliation role to fake claim as scum, is it really that bold?

The thing is, it’s an enormous list of potential roles, so idk what the odds are but if you’re picking randomly, there’s a good chance that you might not hit something someone else has. Even if you do, there’s a decent chance that it might get ignored or overlooked by a player who simply isn’t paying attention to catch it.

Couple that with the fact that maybe your ability role, was a 1x village role And you’re fake claiming your affiliation as the ability role you choice. Plus a scum pack could pool their collective roles to help each other mix and match.

All this to say, I think claiming a 1x affiliation role is something I don’t think village should give too much weight to.
 
vetschoolsletmeinplease- neutral, slight village lean. So far, sounds like her village tone. Haven’t seen a whole lot from her but she is another person who I would be SHOCKED if she willingly chose to be village.
Did you mean “if she willing chose to be scum”?
 
Maybe he’s a wolf/mafia vig or something (and he used the vig for ability and not for affiliation) but that also seems way too bold/risky.
Oh damn, that’s a good point (not that I think Chaos did this, just in general). Scum can claim the rolecard they took ability from as the card they took affiliation from with very few repercussions (there’s few situations where as scum you want to sincerely reveal ability, since you don’t want to limit yourself to town-looking uses of that ability), with no risk that someone else rolled that card.
 
How do YOU feel about them?
I’ve already said my thoughts on wondering.

I agree with the points people have made about coop, and have been pinged by a few things, but since I’ve never played with her I don’t think I’m ready to vote there this early without seeing a little more of the game play out.
 
Oh damn, that’s a good point (not that I think Chaos did this, just in general). Scum can claim the rolecard they took ability from as the card they took affiliation from with very few repercussions (there’s few situations where as scum you want to sincerely reveal ability, since you don’t want to limit yourself to town-looking uses of that ability), with no risk that someone else rolled that card.

This is actually a popular scum tactic , yeah.

But they would have to lie about their actions later on. More lies = More chances of getting caught
 
I mean, I’ve gone back and forth about it. Not Chaos specifically, I am getting village vibes from him.

But the idea in general of choosing a 1x affiliation role to fake claim as scum, is it really that bold?

The thing is, it’s an enormous list of potential roles, so idk what the odds are but if you’re picking randomly, there’s a good chance that you might not hit something someone else has. Even if you do, there’s a decent chance that it might get ignored or overlooked by a player who simply isn’t paying attention to catch it.

Couple that with the fact that maybe your ability role, was a 1x village role And you’re fake claiming your affiliation as the ability role you choice. Plus a scum pack could pool their collective roles to help each other mix and match.

All this to say, I think claiming a 1x affiliation role is something I don’t think village should give too much weight to.

There are 40+ roles in circulation and approx 160 roles in the list. So its a decent risk

But you are right that it shouldnt be given too much weight
 
This is a good point actually.

You have my sheep.
Unvote sunshine , vote wonder.

I find discard analysis in these sort of games in general to be scummy bc thats a low hanging fruit for scum to center their discussion upon , but Wonder was being elaborate so it didnt ping me as anything much earler.

Keep in mind tho , this is a multiball setup and scum has to solve the game too.

Ive added alley's alignment to the list
something's bothering me about chaos's tone and im not super sure what it is. I remember last time i played w them being pinged by their town and i think they ended up town so i think it's a symptom of a different website. but "you have my sheep" and then basically paraphrasing what shorty had said not 45 minutes earlier rubbed me wrong
 
Coops’s entrance felt kind of forced-casual to me, looks like could be trying to cover nerves.

This shade was weird imo





1) The editing and then explanation for the editing also looks like wolfy start-of-game nerves 2) I don’t feel cubs and coop are in the same faction, too much interaction straight out the gate

Like shorty said, the fishing is worrying me

Do not like. Why have you decided who you’re yeeting D2 with so few posts? Yes, I know this is a joke, but it feels like there’s some level of sincerity to it, plus flippancy about deciding who to vote.

This reasoning is just a stretch imo. I know Stagg didn’t understand 100% how roles were chosen, but he did understand that you choose to combine the role from one card with the affiliation from another, so he shouldn’t think this discard is that weird (since there are indeed a lot of ways someone could choose a vanilla town role). Maybe fishing for cray to justify her choice in a way that would hint at role.

How do you feel about Wondering and Coops?
Making note that I really like this post from Vis. In the past she’s been known to make “wall posts” when she’s wolfing to look like she’s wolf hunting, but this analysis seems pretty solid.
 
something's bothering me about chaos's tone and im not super sure what it is. I remember last time i played w them being pinged by their town and i think they ended up town so i think it's a symptom of a different website. but "you have my sheep" and then basically paraphrasing what shorty had said not 45 minutes earlier rubbed me wrong
I get what you’re saying, but this also just sounds like chaos’ “normal” tone to me? I remember him sounding like this in previous games. It did ping me a bit early on, but now I have kind of gotten used to it. However, the “you have my sheep” was weird phrasing imo. It’s usually encouraged to not sheep people, and that was an odd thing to say.
 
something's bothering me about chaos's tone and im not super sure what it is. I remember last time i played w them being pinged by their town and i think they ended up town so i think it's a symptom of a different website. but "you have my sheep" and then basically paraphrasing what shorty had said not 45 minutes earlier rubbed me wrong

I think me and shorty are saying pretty different things actually.

Maybe you think it is similar coz we both used the same "low hanging fruit" phrase?
 
I
Players that have pinged me so far:

Vis -


Seems strange that you worded the first post as if you strongly knew stagg’s preference for ww roles then in the second post after being questioned made your knowledge of stagg sound different especially since you haven’t seemed to play with him prior


Alley:
A lot of fluff (note: I haven’t really played with alley so I don’t know how they normally sound)
Examples -



Also their stagg vote felt off - overexplaining


Also if scum, went the “safe” affiliation route by claiming vanilla townie

@alleycat03 If you were given the choice of vanilla townie or town nymphomaniac for affiliation, is there a reason you chose vanilla townie for your affiliation over town nymphomaniac if both options would have given you town affiliation?

For now:
Vote alley
I like your last question but disagree alleys vote felt overexplainy.
 
Why Cubs? Cubs is already on the board.
Overall have gotten a scum feeling. Vague shade at cray and alley for reasoning that seems completely absent (with cray, just repeating the natural conclusion of what she said in a way that implied it was accusatory. I don’t understand that post) or weak (alley discarded town = 1 less chance at choosing town aff). Then there was that joke about yeeting Stagg next that felt like he was semi-serious about deciding already to vote stagg next, too flippant about using your vote
 
Okay, that makes sense. I’ll take a look at the role list to see if there’s anything it would bad for scum to 100% know is not a role in the game before saying mine

Btw , I think Viscernable is most likely telling the truth about her alignment coz of this line , so thats probably town
 
This is actually a popular scum tactic , yeah.

But they would have to lie about their actions later on. More lies = More chances of getting caught
I don’t think it really changes how many lies they’d have to make about their actions. They already have the problem of lying about their actions because PR scum use PRs scummily so if they come into a situation where they have to claim an ability it’s always gonna be tough. I don’t see how doing this would make them more likely to have to claim an ability later.
 
I
Why didn’t you ask the mods to explain?

Peeps who have played with Coop before, is this level of theatrics about being bad at the game or not understanding the role selection process NAI for her? It feels like scum trying too hard to me, especially paired with the fishing earlier.
I would say kinda NAI for her, but agree on principle that kind of play rankles me for feeling scummy.
 
I don’t think it really changes how many lies they’d have to make about their actions. They already have the problem of lying about their actions because PR scum use PRs scummily so if they come into a situation where they have to claim an ability it’s always gonna be tough. I don’t see how doing this would make them more likely to have to claim an ability later.
idk if it makes it more likely but just IF they do later, they have to be more careful about what they say. bc with the discard and affil list, we have a lot of what isn't in the game, which narrows the pool of what they can claim. and what they can claim is also a lot more likely to overlap w someone's actual role then
 
Did you understand how you were choosing your role? (Legit question)



Oh, well that’s not what I thought was going on. I thought we had to pick one role to publicly discard, Got to pick any one the 3 roles for affiliation, and then had to just pick from one of the two remaining abilities. Idk why I thought this, but I think I confused the mods with my choices as much as I was confused about how to pick my role :depressed:
I had a ton of back and forth with the mods and think that by the end I did understand.
 
@Chaostrodon

So the language has been screwing me up and confusing me. Normally when we talk about “role” it’s a character or non-consistent thing. Like last game my alignment was village, my ability was seer, and my role was Donut (character from Red Vs blue). Calling a vig/vanilla/whatever ability a “role” was throwing me off.

I was assuming for his game that role = affiliation + ability. But it looks like ability and role are being used interchangeably?

I guess with the understanding from my previous post and above I got my affiliation from town vanilla. Although I though I was just picking the role (aff + ability) that I actually have now.
Well to be fair, when he says don't tell us your role, only affiliation, it still makes sense with defining role = aff + ability. He's saying don't give us the whole thing, both pieces. He's effectively saying don't reveal your ability which would give away your role.
 
Top