Congrats to everyone getting II's I cannot wait to see you all on campus milling about in your fancy suits and business wear!
I just want to echo a few comments made in this thread by other students.
1. when you come to interview make sure you come to visit also! we try to schedule our interviews around the weekends so people can get a sense of NOLA. I, personally, would suggest taking any Monday interview available (it gives you the weekend to explore the city and have stuff to talk about during interviews).
2. we do have mid week interview days this year (it can be tough to schedule around T1 and T2 class times). this means if you sign up for one of these spots you should really try to find a way to take time off and come down around the interview, may be harder but I would highly recommend it.
3. As far as I know, there is actually no MCAT cut off, but, like any application, the lower your crude academic stats, the harder it will be to get in unless you shine elsewhere.
4. you get rejected here, don't worry. As has been pointed out Tulane accepts, a rough guess, 250-300 people for a class of 180. over 10,000 apply. that means that 97% won't get in. However, nationwide, in 2013 there were 48,000 applicants and 20,000 accepted which is about 42% acceptance (
https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/newsreleases/358410/20131024.htm). This means that you have a good chance of getting in somewhere (I don't know if those numbers even include DO which is another great option if you can't get MD)!
5. Like every year, people focus to much on US NEWS! I know I did, until I did research and realized just how flawed the system truly is. a quick google search will show plenty of articles and other media that show this (I will link to three at the bottom of the comment, including one from US news itself)! basically the system is terribly set up to weight factors that, in reality, have very little bearing on how good of a doctor you will become given you education at a certain institution. 40% of the ranking is made up of reputation, but as the links below show, the reporting rate is sooo low (under 50% for deans and under 20% for resident directors!) that you have to legitimately question the usefulness of these evaluations (as a tinfoil aside, it is not inconceivable that certain academic institutions (University of Large State) with large residency program cohorts could require all of their directors to fill out a survey and then bias it towards a specific school). Additionally the use of GPA and MCAT falsely objective. GPA is not adjusted for strength of school. a 3.0 at a grade deflated school like say, Colgate University, is much different than a 4.0 at a relatively unknown smaller regional school (lets say Gustavus Adolphus). I am not saying Adolphus is a bad school, but it is unfair to just look at GPA only. additionally with MCAT, while it seems very objective, it falls into the same issues as the SAT and ACT and is not as objective or good a measure as people think. lastly using NIH funding in my opinion, is almost completely useless. for one it leaves out any other non-NIH funding a school may have, but more importantly, as medical students are you going to medical school to become an NIH researcher or to become a clinician? for me it's all about being a clinician and so this has little influence on me but the ratings still incorporate it. And all this is before even mentioning that what use is it to have rankings when there are so few schools to begin with and all have to be held up to exceptionally high standards. for undergrad, where there are literally thousands of schools, maybe the rankings are more useful, but when you are choosing between 120 schools all of whom have to be at, a minimum, excellent don't worry about ranking.
6. one last thing for Tulane, I love it! yes there are things that irritate me about the school, but on balance there are many more positives than negatives (many more is an understatement I think). If you are worried about rankings and reputations, maybe Tulane is not the place for you anyways since people here help each other out and we want an atmosphere where competition is healthy and cordial and people help each other out, not sabotage one another for personal reputation gain. But if you really are worried about reputation, know that Tulane has a good reputation across the country, especially in the south. My parents are both physicians in Rhode Island (clinical faculty at Brown) and when I was contemplating between just accepting Tulane or continuing to ride the brown waitlist they solicited opinions from their colleagues (many of whom are clinical faculty associated with Brown). They said that almost all of them had responses similar to "He got into Tulane? he should just go there, it's a great school." So our reputation is solid to great even as far away as the North East.
sorry for the long post, hope it helps!
here are the sources on US NEWS rankings, I especially recommend the last one.
from Einstein yeshiva:
http://www.einstein.yu.edu/news/rel...e-and-flaws-of-us-news-world-report-rankings/
From US NEWS. they end the article trying to build themselves up, but saying that you are the best at doing the impossible is damning with faint praise:
http://www.usnews.com/education/bes...ical-school-deans-take-on-the-rankings?page=2
an older paper but it outlines many of the basic flaws with US NEWS:
http://medical-mastermind-community...Best_Medical_Schools__A_Critique_of_the.5.pdf