I received a secondary on December 2 at 4:38 PM PDT. I was pretty excited. I sent in the secondary the next day. Thankfully it's not the bear that is the UCLA secondary.
So, for fun I'm going to tell you guys a little story. It relates to the "Did UCSF just send me a secondary because it needs funding" asked in jest earlier in the thread.
As an undergrad at UC Berkeley, some admissions staff from UCSF came over to talk with us about applying to medical school and a little bit about UCSF in particular. She told a story about how a student called her, told her who he was and then asked if they "just sent him a secondary to get the fee?" She told us that she then hung up the phone. She told us, in no uncertain terms, that we should not ask that particular question. She said that she found his application in the stack of applications (this was many years ago--I'm almost embarrassed to say how long) and made certain that it was on the bottom. She made it really clear that we applicants should be extremely nice to all admissions employees, even if we think that the person answering the phone is lowly and unimportant. Something in my gut told me not to mess with this woman!
I'm not saying that I completely believed her, but I hoped that what she said was true. I would prefer that nice people are rewarded. Having worked at a retail pharmacy for 3 years, I can tell you that no matter how tough you get, no matter how used to being verbally abused you become, people can still find a way to get to almost everyone. Sometimes it requires a series of many difficult, unpleasant people. So, I imagine someone else dealing with stressed out people might be similarly abused or treated like a computer rather than a person. I try to be really nice to admissions personnel in part because I imagine that their job is difficult this time of year, but also because it seems best not to mess with them.
[shaking font]Ask admissions personnel about them giving you a secondary for funding at your own peril!!![/shaking font]
Also, as I'm certain many of you have read, UCSF appears to have a uniquely applicant friendly pre-secondary screening. I'm certain that all of you appreciate how nice it is to avoid writing another secondary. Because of that and assuming that UCSF ran admissions similarly back then, I can see why this particularly admissions lady was irked by that particular question.
Good luck to the rest of you still in the running!