Hey guys, Can I ask if the rotation sites at this school are graded more harshly than lesser quality rotation site DO schools? Basically, I have this intuition:
My intuition: Schools with “really good” rotation sites means that, yes the rotation sites teach you well, but they grade you harshly because they expect more from you as compared to “lesser quality” rotation site schools like UNECOM. So CCOMs amazing rotation sites come with harsher grading physicians who expect you to be “strong” because CCOM historically breeds strong medical students.
In my hospital where I scribe it, we have this “really good” EM rotation for PA students, but believe me: it is harsh. Many are expected to know things they say they never learned in their didactic learning, and unfortunately 3/10 fail (That’s it for them, they won’t be PAs, apparently) and the ones that pass are not given “outstanding” results and are usually heavily criticized in their letters and scores.
I fear that higher quality, near the school rotations might be good in increasing your clinical skills, but bad if you want to get into a competitive residency (as you may be graded more harshly based on the expectation that you should know more).
Basically, I got accepted at UNECOM and CCOM, and I’m not sure if CCOMs rotations are a good thing and have this intuition that UNECOMs rotation sites will be also be high quality but also less harsh in grading.