DonutPremed
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 8
Has anyone received either of the other two merit scholarships? Leaders of tomorrow and dean’s leadership are both full-tuition scholarships I believe.
Has anyone received either of the other two merit scholarships? Leaders of tomorrow and dean’s leadership are both full-tuition scholarships I believe.
there's still an entire month! assuming will receive more info at second lookAlso, does anyone know when we can expect to hear back about merit scholarships? I’m not sure how we’re supposed to commit to a school by 4/30 if we won’t be notified of all financial aid by then....
For anyone who got accepted off of the waitlist in previous years, would you mind sharing if this happened to you before or after the 4/30 date?
Just wondering since I’m not sure if I should start booking trips for second looks or if I should give UCLA another week or two first.
Thank you!
While I understand that issues could potentially arise between those who received merit scholarships and those who did not, I would hope that most students--to the extent they had issues--would be critical of the game, not the players. After all, the students who received scholarships did not design the system, and did not seek to harm others. What's more, I can understand UCLA's motives in awarding the scholarship. The school is attempting to lure students who may have otherwise attended high ranking institutions on the right coast. Regardless, I think that the opportunity to attend UCLA medical school is an incredible opportunity, and I hope that all who do are happy with their decision.I appreciate everyone's thoughtful replies regarding the Geffen Scholarship, and I'm glad to see that students who have earned the scholarship are aware of it's potential negative effects on UCLA's class dynamics. I have no doubt that all of you are amazing applicants that absolutely deserve the scholarship. I think @chick_fil_eyyy really hit the nail on the head - it's really more about feeling sidelined by the school, not necessarily by other students. It just seems like all this scholarship does is create two groups, one consisting of the good students and one consisting of the better students. And, as much as we try to deny it, that elephant in the room will be awkward/difficult to avoid. I mean, isn't medical school supposed to be where you make life long friends? How can you expect to make those connections if 1/3 of us have this big secret that we're afraid to reveal because it may upset someone? And it'll become more obvious who has it over time as well - some classmates will be more aloof about going out to eat, or buying a new video game, or maybe even going to Disneyland for a weekend, because, for them, they have the money, why not use it to make medical school a little more enjoyable? But for the rest of us, doing those things means paying back the same amount 3 times over 10 years later. As much as I want to believe that there is absolutely no effect on the class dynamics, basic human psychology tells me otherwise. Geffen scholars will naturally group together because 1) they have the financial means to do similar things together and 2) it's just what humans do - we form groups with similar identities and, as has been discussed before, the school has artificially stratified the scholars into their own identity.
Of course, that is all conjecture, and I sincerely hope I am proved wrong. But there are more consequences to UCLA's decision making beyond arbitrary social interactions. For one, look at UCLA's average debt. Last time I checked, it was about $180,000. While that certainly isn't the largest debt, it is a good notch higher than many of UCLA's peer T10 intuitions. I don't have access to MSAR anymore, but I believe that Harvard was about 120K, Stanford 90K, Mayo 70K, and Yale just recently announced that they aim to drop their average debt to 60K. Columbia has an initiative to eliminate debt for those in financial need. NYU has free tuition. UCLA get's the largest donation in the history of a medical school? They create the Geffen Scholarship program, providing a full ride to a select number of students and not helping anyone else, a fact reflected in that despite the fact that UCLA students benefit from in state tuition (and that 20-30% of their students get a full ride), they still come out with more debt than their peer institutions. What makes this worse is that UCLA encourages its students to pursue primary care, careers that command a lower salary than most specialties. Wouldn't UCLA then want to reduce the debt of all their students so more can perform primary care jobs? Apparently not, they're more interested in recruiting so and so with a nature publication who will hopefully match ortho at Stanford.
I still like UCLA, and I still will likely be attending. But the administration has made decisions about what to do with their money that we, as students, have a responsibility to be critical of. As we all know, money doesn't necessarily recruit students, but reputation and opportunities do. Why do you think so many students over at the school x vs y thread are weighing this scholarship against offers at Harvard and UCSF? UCLA is moving up in the world. We're now #6 on USNWR research and are revitalizing our curriculum. We don't necessarily need the Geffen anymore, students will come here for UCLA, not for the money. The administration should do the responsible thing and use the money to help all their students, not just a select few.
It's what I've been hearing from essentially every school. They want to be able to tell you before you have to narrow down to 3.Dean Hall did say we would hear back with our acceptance but someone on this thread heard a few weeks after their acceptance!
Where did you hear the 4/15 date for scholarships?
I really appreciated being able to read the insights of someone who has been through the program. Thanks for passing on your wisdom. Attending DGSOM sounds like the opportunity of a lifetime.Hello all...I am a semi-recent graduate (4-6 years ago) of DGSOM and current resident at a UCLA affiliated hospital. I posted the following a few years back on the UCLA thread and wanted to share some of my thoughts/mythbusting again about DGSOM-UCLA (Congrats to those holding an acceptance, and hang in there those who are waitlisted). I attended DGSOM prior to the initiation of the Geffen Scholarship, so I can't comment on that dynamic.
First off, I had a fantastic 4 years here. Yes I love UCLA as a university in general, so I may be really bias, but this school will provide you with great medical training in one of the best areas in the country, sunny Southern California. I did not have any of the negative experiences being told on this thread. Let me mythbust some of the comments that have been brought up in the past:
1) DGSOM works you too hard: First and Second year I had ample time to study and also go out and do things I love to do including go to every UCLA football game, just about every home basketball game, frequent trips to Disneyland with college friends, and not to mention Friday and Saturday nights hanging with classmates. Heck I even had time to go to every UCLA football game as a 3rd and 4th year. So this talk about working you to the bone doesn't seem representative. I am no medical genius and had to study for exams but never came close to failing an exam. My work/school life balance was definitely manageable. Never ever did I feel shackled to the work here. I actually think most people here have the West Coast chill and relaxed atmosphere. Class time was manageable with only 15 (15!) hours of required attendance 1st and 2nd year with an additional 10 hours of lecture (all of which are video taped/podcasted). That's 25 hours of class a week, about 5 hours of classroom instruction/day. Yes there will be some self study and preparation at home, but this is a school where you have to be self motivated, things won't be spoon fed to you. Third year will be tough at any medical school but again I don't think I ever worked more than 80 hours a week (the same ACGME requirements that apply to residents) and most weeks were in the 60 hour range which for third year is manageable. 4th year will be variable based off how competitive specialty you go into, but UCLA doesn't work you any more than any other Ortho or Uro subI at any other medical school.
2) UCLA classes are too big: A large class give you such diverse claassmates from all walks of life, with different majors and experiences, and interested in just about every specialty. For first and second year, the whole class attends/podcasts the lecture in the morning and then the class is divided in 3 groups (50-60 students) to rotate through the afternoon labs Tues-Thurs. A lot of these labs are broken down into smaller groups of 8-10 students for the learning activities. PBL on Monday and Friday mornings are 8-9 students each. Anatomy has 3-4 students/body. So I think you do get a good faculty: student ratio. 3rd and 4th year typically has at most 2 other students with you on your team and there usually no animosity between them. Most of the time you will be the only 3rd or only 4th year on your ward team.
3) UCLA doesn't emphasize patient care: This is hogwash. From day one they emphasize the doctor-patient relationship and are always culturally sensitive care, especially given that Los Angeles is such a melting pot of different races/ethnicities/cultures. First and Second year has something called "Doctoring" where you spend you about a fifiteen afternoons each year in a small group of 8 students with two faculty members going over interviewing techniques and honing your humanistic skills to talk to patients. 3rd year this continues with "System Based Healthcare" which is held every 3 weeks where you leave the wards and come and discuss again in small groups your experiences with healthcare principles and ethics from your experiences third year. OSCE exams require written self reflection of watching the video of you interviewing the standardized patient. UCLA really emphasizes patient care.
4) UCLA graduates don't perform as well as the schools reputation suggests: I will be honest, the school does not teach to the boards. You will not be spoon fed Step 1 facts for the first two years. However this doesn't mean we don't do well on the boards. Our class average was 10 points over the national average for step 1 wit a lot of my friends breaking the 260 mark. The proof of performance is always in the match list and I can tell you that the match list is absolutely incredible. UCLA students typically like to stay near by so about 40% stay at a UCLA affiliated hospital (usually ranking the programs in their top 3), 20% go to bay area (mainly UCSF and Stanford), 15% stay somewhere else on the West Coast, and the rest go across the country, mainly to Chicago, Michigan, Texas, and the prestigious East Coast Programs in NYC, Boston, Baltimore, and North Carolina. And we match very well in competitive specialties like Derm, Ophtho, Ortho, Plastics and Uro. I got my number one choice and have a very strong suspicion that the program I ended up in ranked me to match.
5) UCLA students are stuck up/lame: Again not true. In a big class you will find people that are very similar to you and people very different from you. The diversity of the class is amazing. But the people are really fun, social, and driven. Our class had numerous hangouts, parties, and activities. We had block parties, beach days, ski trips, vegas trips, tailgates, football games, dinners and so much more. And that is just the organized class-wide stuff.
6) The faculty don't care about the students: False. A top 10 medical center in the nation and best on the west coast is staffed by top 10 set of faculty physicians that care about your success. They come in teach in the lecture hall 1st and 2nd year and they are the ones leading your ward teams 3rd and 4th year. They are outstanding physician educators and they really care about medical students.
7) UCLA has malignant wards towards medical students: I was never abused or harassed in my 4 years. Period. I was given constructive criticism at times that I know made me a better physician, but I was never yelled at, thrown out of the OR, or used as a punching bag. Medicine is a stressful field and people will get frustrated, but never was the frustration taken out on me. Residents and Faculty always treated me with respect. And the school take medical student abuse very very seriously. One faculty member, Joyce Fried, has made it her mission to stamp out Gender and Power abuse in the UCLA culture. She has started several initiatives including resident awards, campaigns for abuse awareness, and safe havens and anonymous reporting of suspected abuse. You can check out her work in this 2012 article: Med school redoubles efforts to abolish mistreatment of students (I'm sure there is even more recent ones). I felt really safe and never crossed my mind that anything would be used against me in my evaluations. I felt my evaluations accurately represented my performance on the wards.
8) UCLA doesn't provide great training: UCLA has one of the most diverse hospital systems, and is basically the only medical school rotating through them, so you don't often share the hospital or teams with other students (some places have Podiatry or DO students, but you don't really interact with them that much). We have 2 counties (Olive View and Harbor) that like all counties across the nation are understaffed and rely on medical students to get really involved. I was doing ABGs on my own, signing orders, putting in foleys and assisting residents in line placements at Harbor. We have a VA that has very bread and butter medicine in the veteran population. We have 2 state of the art private hospitals in Reagan and our affiliation with Cedars that sees some of the craziest, rarest stuff on the West Coast. We can rotate through Kaiser LA to see HMO care and their emphasis on population based medicine (although with the new med school opening there in a few years, not sure how much it will be open for UCLA students to rotate at). And with a diverse hospital system, you have a diverse patient population that really teaches you how to be a culturally competent, patient care first physician.
9) LA is expensive: Ok this is true, but I don't think it's as expensive as the Bay Area, Chicago, and Northeast. Rent will typically be about 1400 for a studio, 1700 for a one bedroom, and 2100 for a 2 bedroom. On campus housing and married/family housing are fair pricing. Traffic sucks and you will need a car given how spread out all our training sites are, but you get used to it.
10) Just a quick note about bureaucracy: This is a state institution, so it will have some of the red tape that comes with public institutions. But I don't think this is any more than other public schools and really it's usually over little things like delays in getting your 3rd year schedule for 2 weeks from the announced date, getting permits from the main campus to hold certain events on campus, applying for funding for projects, etc. I would be lying if I said it doesn't exist, but it never negatively impacted my abilities to succeed at this school.
I know this is one opinion but after going through the last 4 years and knowing what I know now, I would absolutely choose UCLA again for my medical school education. I felt my years here really prepared me for my residency training and my future career and provided the professional connections and awesome friends along the way. And I thought the work/school life balance as very manageable for me to enjoy time outside of school going home and seeing family, exploring SoCal, and hanging out with both college and medical school friends. Hope that helps clear up some of the insights about DGSOM.
I've emailed them like three times. Different people too. Not a word lolDoes UCLA match offers?
Did anyone ever recieve a link to RSVP for the CASIT tour for second look?
looking at their match list, not as impressive as you would think for such a high ranking school
@hiitsme1234 First, some context so that what I say makes sense to anyone who isn't familiar with Step 1 scores (don't worry about Step 2; everyone does better, it matters less, and some people don't even take it early enough to report it for residency apps):
- https://www.usmle.org/pdfs/transcripts/USMLE_Step_Examination_Score_Interpretation_Guidelines.pdf Breakdown of Step 1 score distribution. Theoretically the highest score is 300, but I have never heard of anyone at this school or another breaking 275 (if anyone here has, I'd be interested to hear what that score was out of curiosity). Someone can figure out the exact percentile correlations for rough equivalencies to the old and new MCAT scores so that you have some sense. But for a gross approximation, I would say that compared to the old MCAT, you could consider the following more or less equal (everyone here will disagree with me by a bit on the exact numbers by a bit but this is at least a good enough estimate for a pre-med thinking about Step):
- 32 ~ 220
- 36 ~ 230
- 40 ~ 240
- 42 ~ 260
- 44 ~ 270
- http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Charting-Outcomes-in-the-Match-2018-Seniors.pdfNRMP Breakdown of matching by specialty. See page 95 for % matched for a given Step score. See specialty-specific pages for average step scores of matched applicants. Highlights of the most competitive specialties excerpted below:
- Neurosurg 245
- Ophtho 245
- IR 246
- RadOnc 247
- Ortho 248
- ENT 248
- Derm 248
- Plastics 249
- So, at least the way I think about it, high 240s are great scores that will not close any doors for you (at the average for even the most competitive specialties). 250s are even better, 260s are truly exceptional and deserve a fancy bottle of wine uncorked to celebrate. 270s are absurd, and I have actually heard some attendings and residents say they actually view those students as "weird." I've been cited that "265-270 is the sweet spot" by plastics; a very difficult sweet spot that is unrealistic and not necessary for most students, but just to give you a sense that going over 270 is neither necessary nor even recommended.
Funny story....PD in a top neurosurgery department told me that you need at least a 270 on Step 1 to even be considered for his program
Some people were rejected post-II at the same time we were put on the WL in MarchSo I've been WL at UCLA for a while and I was wondering UCLA rejects people post II? Does the WL mean anything or do they WL everyone?
So they were accidentally rejected and then put on the WL?Some people were rejected post-II at the same time we were put on the WL in March
Me friend was accidentally WL'ed and then rejected a few hours after.So they were accidentally rejected and then put on the WL?
No they were rejected and other people were put on the waitlistSo they were accidentally rejected and then put on the WL?
This is just me but if i had another top 10 and UCLA didn't give me the scholarships I would go to the other top 10. To me i would feel disposal and disheartened if i got in UCLA without Geffen.I am fortunate to have been accepted here (without scholarship) and am trying to make a decision on whether to come vs. another top 10 school. I loved the campus, location, people seemed friendly, I like the large class size. But one thing that turned me off in general was the admissions process/office. In my experience, the admissions office was pretty unresponsive (by phone and email) when responding to my questions, and my interview day seemed kind of poorly run (things were not on time, some speakers were missing). Also, Dean Hall was very vague in when telling us when we'd hear back, which was kinda disappointing given they said they were trying to be transparent. Basically, all the logistic aspects of the admissions process were the worst I experienced compared to all of the other schools I interviewed at (both public and private, both in CA and out of CA).
Based on what I've heard from other students in person and on this forum, this opinion is not uncommon either. People don't seem to like the admissions process here (looks like this year they accidently sent people rejection emails when they waitlisted or something?). They don't really do a good job of giving you a good first impression of the school here and it kind of seems like they don't care about it.
My question for people who matriculated here: does these negative attributes of the admissions office extend beyond the admissions process? I think i'd be happy here in terms of the people/location/opportunities, but I'm worried that I'll have to deal with logisitical difficulties/annoyances similar to the admissions process. Basically, can you address why the admissions process seems like it sucks here, and does this bother you at all after you matriculate?
I understand your frustration with the admissions process. That is something the administration should make every effort to address—ASAP. However, I don’t think that will affect your medical school experience, as the happiness of current med students attests. I would attend UCLA (or the other Top 10) if that is where you feel you fit best.I am fortunate to have been accepted here (without scholarship) and am trying to make a decision on whether to come vs. another top 10 school. I loved the campus, location, people seemed friendly, I like the large class size. But one thing that turned me off in general was the admissions process/office. In my experience, the admissions office was pretty unresponsive (by phone and email) when responding to my questions, and my interview day seemed kind of poorly run (things were not on time, some speakers were missing). Also, Dean Hall was very vague in when telling us when we'd hear back, which was kinda disappointing given they said they were trying to be transparent. Basically, all the logistic aspects of the admissions process were the worst I experienced compared to all of the other schools I interviewed at (both public and private, both in CA and out of CA).
Based on what I've heard from other students in person and on this forum, this opinion is not uncommon either. People don't seem to like the admissions process here (looks like this year they accidently sent people rejection emails when they waitlisted or something?). They don't really do a good job of giving you a good first impression of the school here and it kind of seems like they don't care about it.
My question for people who matriculated here: does these negative attributes of the admissions office extend beyond the admissions process? I think i'd be happy here in terms of the people/location/opportunities, but I'm worried that I'll have to deal with logisitical difficulties/annoyances similar to the admissions process. Basically, can you address why the admissions process seems like it sucks here, and does this bother you at all after you matriculate?
To folks on the WL, definitely don't lose hope. A lot of accepted people I talked to during second look had other options on the east coast that they were leaning towards. I'm guessing there'll be a good movement in the WL
That's interesting to hear. I can't speak to the 'awkwardness' but I think we have had multiple UCLA students chime in on this thread and tell us that there has not been any of that among them and their classmates. I can speak to the research, however, and I can tell you that having spoken to a couple of MS4s there, there is absolutely no difference in terms of the research opportunities available. The only thing is that geffen scholars don't have to apply for the summer scholarship money for research and non-geffens do. However, it's important to note that the money for research during that summer is guaranteed for all students and the two-page form that non-geffens have to submit is nothing but a formality. I have not been a fan of the way applicants have been treated either, but I think it's important to have all the facts as well before making a decision.Will also be withdrawing my acceptance and attending another school for the same reasons listed above. When I attended second look, current students admitted the slight awkwardness and reduced research opportunities for those not receiving the Geffen, which imho is just not an appropriate atmosphere for a t10 medical school. Will instead be attending a different t10 school that does not offer merit aid to any student (and also frankly had a much more responsive and welcoming administration and student body). Highly disappointed, as UCLA was my number 1 choice going into the cycle.
Of course, UCLA is an amazing institution and an incredible opportunity for any student. I hope my withdrawing opens up a spot for someone on the waitlist!
Will also be withdrawing my acceptance and attending another school for the same reasons listed above. When I attended second look, current students admitted the slight awkwardness and reduced research opportunities for those not receiving the Geffen, which imho is just not an appropriate atmosphere for a t10 medical school. Will instead be attending a different t10 school that does not offer merit aid to any student (and also frankly had a much more responsive and welcoming administration and student body). Highly disappointed, as UCLA was my number 1 choice going into the cycle.
Of course, UCLA is an amazing institution and an incredible opportunity for any student. I hope my withdrawing opens up a spot for someone on the waitlist!
Lol don't you want a little break before starting the madness that's med school? You'll have a lot of time for research!wow this thread blew up with the geffen vs non-geffen thing...
At the end of the day, guys, just know that this is SDN. AKA anyone can say anything they with whatever intentions.
My second look experience:
- Amazing current MS1s. I exchanged a lot of phone numbers and one of them is actually helping me to land a spot for the summer research (before school begins) in the lab he's working at for a quick project.
- The foods are great! I liked the toco, pasta...etc. IDK Why they had garlic cream cheese for breakfast...
- Talked to Dean Hall, super nice guy and actually explained to me why delay occurs (lots of back/forth and/or tabling at both committee meetings, meetings don't occur that often, rater/interviewer procrastination = months of silence). The dude(shout out to your bravery!!) in front of me talking to Dean Hall asked him about the threshold! Dean Hall dodged it and said they are reconsidering and it was a lot more complicated.
- I cringed a little during the DEI pannel... no offense but it was just a little, I swear it's just a little, too much Political correctness for me. UCB people plz don't crucify me.
research for the summer seems relaxing tbhLol don't you want a little break before starting the madness that's med school? You'll have a lot of time for research!
DGSOM's website says that the White Coat Ceremony will take place on August 9 at 4 PM at Royce Hall. If my aging memory is serving me correctly, I recall that Royce Hall is pretty big. Do any current medical students (or anyone else) know if there is a limit on the number of people that can attend the ceremony for any one student?
Pretty sure capacity of Royce is just under 2K. So I think there will be enough room for you to bring your 10-15 family members.DGSOM's website says that the White Coat Ceremony will take place on August 9 at 4 PM at Royce Hall. If my aging memory is serving me correctly, I recall that Royce Hall is pretty big. Do any current medical students (or anyone else) know if there is a limit on the number of people that can attend the ceremony for any one student?
Lol don't you want a little break before starting the madness that's med school? You'll have a lot of time for research!
Dean mentioned that UCLA does reject applicants post-II at my interview.So... does anyone know how many applicants are on the WL and whether the committee will meet again to decide? Browsing previous threads, there seems to be a departure from past years. I recall Dean mentioning everyone would be put on WL post-II but alas this is not the case.
No.Does the admissions office send out email confirmation of receipt for updates uploaded to the portal?