2019-2020 NYU

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I totally agree with you, and what you are saying is consistent with what I heard from several admissions offices with respect to expected poaching from T5. You are 1,000% correct about all the underqualified people who might throw in an application, but that WILL serve to lower the overall admit rate, even though I hear what you are saying about the admit rate for those with median stats (and above) not changing. It will, however, dramatically alter the landscape for those in the bottom 25% of stats (for NYU), since the competition there will increase significantly.

I heard from several T20 schools that they do not intend to compete with NYU with respect to non-need based aid (i.e., merit money, or free tuition), and I guess it remains to be seen whether money will drive decisions away from them and towards NYU (assuming I am lucky enough to have this decision, a $250,000 difference in debt between Harvard, Penn, Columbia, Chicago, Vandy, etc. and NYU would absolutely tip the scale for me), and, if so, if that causes the other schools to rethink their position.

Either way, it's impossible for me to see how free tuition for all at a T10 school will not drive yield significantly higher, even if it does not propel NYU further up the rankings. Assuming their yield spikes, that will make it relatively more difficult in the future to score an II, since they will not have to meet as many applicants to hit a target class size. This will probably affect this year's cycle, since they already know what their yield was for the just completed cycle, even though that number is not yet available to us.


Thats a really interesting notion. If their yield goes up, they might interview less people but they also might not? Maybe it will just be harder to secure an acceptance post interview. I am interested to see how other schools respond. If a school really wants a candidate, ive heard they will match aid
 
I totally agree with you, and what you are saying is consistent with what I heard from several admissions offices with respect to expected poaching from T5. You are 1,000% correct about all the underqualified people who might throw in an application, but that WILL serve to lower the overall admit rate, even though I hear what you are saying about the admit rate for those with median stats (and above) not changing. It will, however, dramatically alter the landscape for those in the bottom 25% of stats (for NYU), since the competition there will increase significantly.

I heard from several T20 schools that they do not intend to compete with NYU with respect to non-need based aid (i.e., merit money, or free tuition), and I guess it remains to be seen whether money will drive decisions away from them and towards NYU (assuming I am lucky enough to have this decision, a $250,000 difference in debt between Harvard, Penn, Columbia, Chicago, Vandy, etc. and NYU would absolutely tip the scale for me), and, if so, if that causes the other schools to rethink their position.

Either way, it's impossible for me to see how free tuition for all at a T10 school will not drive yield significantly higher, even if it does not propel NYU further up the rankings. Assuming their yield spikes, that will make it relatively more difficult in the future to score an II, since they will not have to meet as many applicants to hit a target class size. This will probably affect this year's cycle, since they already know what their yield was for the just completed cycle, even though that number is not yet available to us.
Penn Does have merit scholarships in addition to need.
 
This may be a dumb question, but if we're not interested in doing the tertiary, we just don't submit it right? My review page has a bunch of green checks and then that one red exclamation mark and it's freaking me out. I submitted a while back so I'm good right?
 
Apologies because I know this topic has been addressed before but I submitted my Secondary on 7/14 with everything but the tertiary app. I have yet to receive a completed email but and there is an incomplete mark next to the tertiary app part, but everything else is complete and submitted. Should I be concerned that I have yet to receive a "complete" confirmation email?
 
You don’t have to submit the tertiary for your application to be complete
 
Apologies because I know this topic has been addressed before but I submitted my Secondary on 7/14 with everything but the tertiary app. I have yet to receive a completed email but and there is an incomplete mark next to the tertiary app part, but everything else is complete and submitted. Should I be concerned that I have yet to receive a "complete" confirmation email?
I got an II w no complete email and incomplete for tertiary. You’ll be fine! 🙂
 
Where did you see this? I'm willing to bet it was the year before last year. Hard to imagine ~160 students turning down free tuition.

Not uncommon for a student who gets into NYU to get in at another T20school that also offers them full tuition. Hence not turning down free tuition by turning down NYU.
 
it says 2500 characters for the dviersity prompt, but you can type more?
Most limits usually cut you off when you reach it. You can always paste more and see what happens. You dont even need to have real information to check. Any piece of typed text will do.
 
I have seen Columbia, Penn, UCLA, Vanderbilt, Wash U, Einstein, Keck, Miami, Emory.
All in the Help me Choose A vs B discussions category.
Add Chicago to schools with scholarships.

Most of the top Ivies and Stanford also have financial aid without loans that covers tuition.
 
Would any current students here be willing to chat briefly about the school/program? 🙂

That is what we are here for! Feel free to post a question or message us and we'll get back to you!

This may be a dumb question, but if we're not interested in doing the tertiary, we just don't submit it right? My review page has a bunch of green checks and then that one red exclamation mark and it's freaking me out. I submitted a while back so I'm good right?

I'll answer this since it gets asked a lot. You do not need to submit a teritary application if you do not want to apply to the 3-year program. It will still be marked as incomplete on the portal, but as long as the secondary application is submitted, you are fine.

If there are any other questions, feel free to ask!
 
Thats a really interesting notion. If their yield goes up, they might interview less people but they also might not? Maybe it will just be harder to secure an acceptance post interview. I am interested to see how other schools respond. If a school really wants a candidate, ive heard they will match aid
Historically, "aid" has meant need-based aid. Free tuition for all at a top school is a new thing. The top schools I have spoken to have indicated that they have no plans to match NYU, but I agree with you insofar as I'll believe that when I see it. I can't believe that top schools will allow NYU to poach over money, when they all have so much. It remains to be seen....
 
Penn Does have merit scholarships in addition to need.
Understood, but that doesn't mean everyone who gets into Penn with a NYU acceptance gets a full tuition scholarship offer! It will be great if it does, because that will mean NYU's yield won't increase after all, and lots more people will be receiving full tuition scholarships from a lot more schools!! 🙂
 
Understood, but that doesn't mean everyone who gets into Penn with a NYU acceptance gets a full tuition scholarship offer! It will be great if it does, because that will mean NYU's yield won't increase after all, and lots more people will be receiving full tuition scholarships from a lot more schools!! 🙂
People do choose Harvard over full scholarship at Penn today. All we are discussing is whether choices can exist at other schools. However, many choose prestige and debt over fiscal responsibility and make do.
 
People do choose Harvard over full scholarship at Penn today. All we are discussing is whether choices can exist at other schools. However, many choose prestige and debt over fiscal responsibility and make do.
Yes, I hear that as well, as that is the message that I received from the schools I asked - basically, we are not going to allow NYU to dictate how we distribute our tuition discounts (scholarships and aid) and are not going to compete with them based on price. If people follow the Harvard over Penn model, there will be about a dozen schools, give or take, that won't budge, and the rest will either lose candidates to NYU or will figure out a way to find money to keep them.

For the record, this is different from one school finding some money to match an aid offer from another school (which is very common), because this involves full tuition, and isn't based on need. A lot of schools just have a policy pursuant to which, if they don't designate you as worthy of whatever merit scholarships they have during the admission process, they won't reconsider based on what another school does, because they don't have a budget for that. Basically, if the adcom didn't designate you for non-need based scholarship money at the outset, I am hearing they won't reconsider just because you get in to NYU, where everyone accepted indiscriminately receives a full tuition scholarship. The matches today are limited in scope, and typically involve reconsidering financial need.

Finally, I totally respect everyone's right to make their own decision, based on the experience they want, their family's financial circumstances, and the amount of debt they are willing to take on, but, for me, the T3, T5, T10, and even down to around T20 schools in the US are all among the very finest in the world, so as awesome as the opportunities might be in Boston as compared to Philadelphia, I personally would never borrow an extra $250,000 to have the Harvard experience over Penn, or Stanford over Hopkins, etc., but that's just me, and there is no one right answer for everyone. I very seriously doubt I am NYU worthy, but NYU is clearly targeting people who think like me vs. the people who choose Harvard full pay over Penn full scholarship.
 
The Harvard name opens a lot of doors for people who are thinking about ventures besides practicing. Also there are some families that have so much money where 250k to them is a bad weekend in Vegas
 
Yes, I hear that as well, as that is the message that I received from the schools I asked - basically, we are not going to allow NYU to dictate how we distribute our tuition discounts (scholarships and aid) and are not going to compete with them based on price. If people follow the Harvard over Penn model, there will be about a dozen schools, give or take, that won't budge, and the rest will either lose candidates to NYU or will figure out a way to find money to keep them.

For the record, this is different from one school finding some money to match an aid offer from another school (which is very common), because this involves full tuition, and isn't based on need. A lot of schools just have a policy pursuant to which, if they don't designate you as worthy of whatever merit scholarships they have during the admission process, they won't reconsider based on what another school does, because they don't have a budget for that. Basically, if the adcom didn't designate you for non-need based scholarship money at the outset, I am hearing they won't reconsider just because you get in to NYU, where everyone accepted indiscriminately receives a full tuition scholarship. The matches today are limited in scope, and typically involve reconsidering financial need.

Finally, I totally respect everyone's right to make their own decision, based on the experience they want, their family's financial circumstances, and the amount of debt they are willing to take on, but, for me, the T3, T5, T10, and even down to around T20 schools in the US are all among the very finest in the world, so as awesome as the opportunities might be in Boston as compared to Philadelphia, I personally would never borrow an extra $250,000 to have the Harvard experience over Penn, or Stanford over Hopkins, etc., but that's just me, and there is no one right answer for everyone. I very seriously doubt I am NYU worthy, but NYU is clearly targeting people who think like me vs. the people who choose Harvard full pay over Penn full scholarship.

The financial aid works in mysterious ways at top schools but at a basic level, you are expected to pay for your own expenses by borrowing the money (30k per year). Rest is based on your assets and your parental FAFSA. If the parental income is at 70-80k and they dont have a home valued at over 100-200k, you may get all the tuition money as financial aid. In many cases, they are older and have money accumulated for retirement, will have assets from which they are expected to contribute 5% and that messes up any aid coming for tuition.

So essentially, if your parents are frugal and saved over time, it eliminates most financial aid.

There is a good percentage of students who are from wealthier families with physician parent(s). Agree with Calipremed5768 that cost is not a big issue for probably 10-20% of those pursuing medicine.

Interestingly, several of the scholarships at Penn are funded by family wealth. A Dr. Gamble attended Penn and funded many scholarships from his inheritance of Proctor & Gamble shares.
 
Last edited:
I know some schools (or at least, Northwestern specifically) allow you to claim financial independence from your parents and calculate your financial aid accordingly. I appreciate this.
At any age? Do you have to be out of school for a certain length of time?

Edit - never mind. I can Google!! 🙂

Yes. To be considered for institutional need-based grant funds, students must submit their parents' information as part of the application for financial aid. If students do not submit their parents’ information and do not meet the criteria for independent status, they will not be considered for institutional grant assistance. Only students who can prove that they have earned a self-supporting wage of $2,200 per month for 30 months or more will be considered independent students. Income earned while attending an undergraduate program or earned through a graduate fellowship or other sources of financial aid will not count toward the 30-month requirement.

You have to actually be living on at least $26,400 that you earn yourself for at least 2.5 years post-UG. That won't work for any traditional candidate. Unfortunately, you can't just claim independence.
 
...im in trouble.
My parents make a decent amount ($130K?) but they were in massive credit card debt until like 8 years ago and have since taken a second mortgage on their house to afford 3 cruises a year so they have no assets....where do I stand with financial aid? Lol
 
What if I worked for 3 years BEFORE undergrad and then made the decision to go back to school?
I think it counts, at least for NW specifically. They say it doesn't necessarily need to be the time right before medical school. "The 30 months do not need to be the two-and-a-half years immediately prior to matriculation."
 
My parents make a decent amount ($130K?) but they were in massive credit card debt until like 8 years ago and have since taken a second mortgage on their house to afford 3 cruises a year so they have no assets....where do I stand with financial aid? Lol
People who are married with or without kids are automatically independent for financial aid. Some financial advisors suggest getting married in high school to declare independence.
 
People who are married with or without kids are automatically independent for financial aid. Some financial advisors suggest getting married in high school to declare independence.
This is true ONLY for undergrad. I 1000% need to report my parental income at every medical school and my parental income and assets will be considered for need based aid. Now, the fact that I have a child, a spouse, am on state food and healthcare benefits...those will likely all factor in as well. But, to anyone reading with kids/married, it sucks but You DO need your parents’ info on FAFSA. Same reason I didn’t qualify for FAP. Is rediculous.
 
@NYUAmbassadors

Serious question here about the 3-year program. Would it possible to take a gap year between med school and residency while remaining in the program? I'd like to take the year to get a masters in computer science either elsewhere or at NYU.
 
This is true ONLY for undergrad. I 1000% need to report my parental income at every medical school and my parental income and assets will be considered for need based aid. Now, the fact that I have a child, a spouse, am on state food and healthcare benefits...those will likely all factor in as well. But, to anyone reading with kids/married, it sucks but You DO need your parents’ info on FAFSA. Same reason I didn’t qualify for FAP. Is rediculous.
That is interesting. What happens if you say your parents and you have been independent forever? If I remember correctly, there is also an age when they no longer ask about your parents.
 
That is interesting. What happens if you say your parents and you have been independent forever? If I remember correctly, there is also an age when they no longer ask about your parents.
I have been financially independent for almost 7 years and it doesn’t matter. I know some schools set an age limit if 30 or 35 (Stanford is 30) but the majority of schools will count parental income up until they are both dead.
 
I have been financially independent for almost 7 years and it doesn’t matter. I know some schools set an age limit if 30 or 35 (Stanford is 30) but the majority of schools will count parental income up until they are both dead.
And even if they are both dead, you have to bend over backwards to prove that they are.
 
And even if they are both dead, you have to bend over backwards to prove that they are.
Thats elites for you saying you should get an inheritance or borrow. At least the lower level schools tell you to just borrow without blaming your parents.

Of our financial aid recipients at HMS, 1 in 5 come from a family whose annual income is less than $50,000 and 50 percent qualify for our Middle Income Initiative.

So about 80% are being asked to contribute and only 50% are eligible are any aid.
 
Thats elites for you saying you should get an inheritance or borrow. At least the lower level schools tell you to just borrow without blaming your parents.
Yah, I am hoping I am poor enough in the context of individualized FA and/or successful enough for some merit aid. Only time will tell.
 
@NYUAmbassadors

I just got a confirmation for a double room for my interview. Does this mean I am sharing with someone else?
 
Thats elites for you saying you should get an inheritance or borrow. At least the lower level schools tell you to just borrow without blaming your parents.



So about 80% are being asked to contribute and only 50% are eligible are any aid.
I actually don't think it has anything to do with elites, and has everything to do with the institution saying they want their need-based money to go to those who don't have any other resources rather than those who would like to keep their resources. It sucks if you are estranged from your parents or genuinely don't want to burden them, but the alternative is to create a system that is so wide open that everyone games it, resulting in less money going to those who really need it in order to allow parents with resources to keep more of them.

The way I'm reading your HMS blurb is that more than half of the people eligible for the middle class initiative come from families earning more than $50K
 
I actually don't think it has anything to do with elites, and has everything to do with the institution saying they want their need-based money to go to those who don't have any other resources rather than those who would like to keep their resources. It sucks if you are estranged from your parents or genuinely don't want to burden them, but the alternative is to create a system that is so wide open that everyone games it, resulting in less money going to those who really need it in order to allow parents with resources to keep more of them.

The way I'm reading your HMS blurb is that more than half of the people eligible for the middle class initiative come from families earning more than $50K

Memelord is independent and has been supporting themselves and a child for 7 years. How do you justify Harvard considering what their parents are worth to determine the need?

As a pessimist, we are saying 50% of the applicants get zilch, Should we read it as 30%?
 
@NYUAmbassadors

Serious question here about the 3-year program. Would it possible to take a gap year between med school and residency while remaining in the program? I'd like to take the year to get a masters in computer science either elsewhere or at NYU.

Thanks for the question! In theory, it should be possible to do so. However, that would depend on what the residency director of the specific program that you plan to apply to thinks about it. The best course of action would be to apply for the program that you want, and if selected for an interview, discuss that. You can also email our admissions office at [email protected] and they might be able to give you a better answer on your specific program. I hope that helps, and let us know if you have any further questions!
 
My parents make a decent amount ($130K?) but they were in massive credit card debt until like 8 years ago and have since taken a second mortgage on their house to afford 3 cruises a year so they have no assets....where do I stand with financial aid? Lol
Don’t laugh, you have quite a decent chance of getting side. And a higher chance with any siblings also in school.
 
Don’t laugh, you have quite a decent chance of getting side. And a higher chance with any siblings also in school.
My brother has been out of undergrad for 4 years, I am first generation, my mom is recently unemployed, I have a child and a spouse, and I collect food stamps and have state health insurance - am I needy enough?
 
Memelord is independent and has been supporting themselves and a child for 7 years. How do you justify Harvard considering what their parents are worth to determine the need?

As a pessimist, we are saying 50% of the applicants get zilch, Should we read it as 30%?
I don't justify it at all; Harvard justifies it by saying if Meme's parents don't want to support his dream financially, neither do they. It's simple -- NYU, to its credit, is saying money shouldn't be an issue, they have the ability to raise it, and they did so in order to allow everyone to pursue their dream on equal footing, with the hope that future MDs pay it forward. Harvard, on the other hand, is saying Meme's parents can afford to support his dream (whether or not they are obliged to do so), and they would rather funnel their money to students whose parents do not have six figure incomes.

Both points of view have their merits (I know which one I support! 🙂), but there really is no right or wrong. Harvard is simply making a value judgment that if Meme's parents don't want to lessen the financial burden on Meme, they are not going to ask their donors to do so either, and they are going to support Meme's parents' decision to let him borrow the money.

No, don't read the Harvard number as 30% getting zilch; I have no idea what that number is. I think you just misread their blurb. They said 50% are eligible for the middle class initiative, and 20% come from families earning less than $50k. This means 30% (or 60% of the 50%) come from families earning more than $50k. I am not familiar -- do you get zilch if you aren't eligible for the middle class initiative?
 
Memelord is independent and has been supporting themselves and a child for 7 years. How do you justify Harvard considering what their parents are worth to determine the need?
I don't justify it at all; Harvard justifies it by saying if Meme's parents don't want to support his dream financially, neither do they. It's simple -- NYU, to its credit, is saying money shouldn't be an issue, they have the ability to raise it, and they did so in order to allow everyone to pursue their dream on equal footing, with the hope that future MDs pay it forward. Harvard, on the other hand, is saying Meme's parents can afford to support his dream (whether or not they are obliged to do so), and they would rather funnel their money to students whose parents do not have six figure incomes.

Both points of view have their merits (I know which one I support! 🙂), but there really is no right or wrong. Harvard is simply making a value judgment that if Meme's parents don't want to lessen the financial burden on Meme, they are not going to ask their donors to do so either, and they are going to support Meme's parents' decision to let him borrow the money.

No, don't read the Harvard number as 30% getting zilch; I have no idea what that number is. I think you just misread their blurb. They said 50% are eligible for the middle class initiative, and 20% come from families earning less than $50k. This means 30% (or 60% of the 50%) come from families earning more than $50k. I am not familiar -- do you get zilch if you aren't eligible for the middle class initiative?

It can either mean 30% or 50% but it is zilch since they are specifying half get money.

If Harvard assumes someone who is independent, married and has kids is supposed to go back to parents hat in hand they are simply saying we are only going to support so many students and not raising our financial aid to meet the realistic need. I go back to my original statement - they want to blame the parents.

Btw, the financial aid package a constant number. Just because the school says they don't consider the need, the amount automatically does not shoot up to 50 million one year and drop to 25 million next because everyone is rich. They admit students with certain institutional goals and available money somehow meets the admitted class.
 
The Harvard name opens a lot of doors for people who are thinking about ventures besides practicing. Also there are some families that have so much money where 250k to them is a bad weekend in Vegas
What other ventures are you talking about? Very interested in learning more!
 
Running for office, executive positions at hospitals etc. I think that something like 25% of UCSF grads don’t end up practicing
 
Top