@sr4b That's a great question and a really important one to ask. I'm going to try to not do the "our weaknesses are actually strengths" thing, but I will definitely note where things were fixed or addressed along the way and why I think that's important. Also, please keep in mind that a lot of this is a result of both being the first year of a new curriculum and of COVID and that these are just my opinions. So in no particular order:
- Module 1 was sort of a joke and wasn't great preparation for Module 2. It was a good reminder of basic biochemistry and genetics and cell and molecular bio, but at times it felt like a waste of time. Module 2 felt a lot harder, so the transition wasn't super smooth. That being said, we gave a lot of feedback about it.
- Admin has been a little tone-deaf at times. A great example is when we were starting our anatomy block. We had a mandatory session where they told us about how formative of an experience dissection would be and how meaningful it is, then told us that we wouldn't be dissecting and we'd just be watching prosections. There was some pretty serious pushback on that, and they apologized and addressed our concerns, but it does seem like they can be a little out of touch at times. However, they had a long town hall and tried to explain their reasoning. We did get to start in-person dissection this module, though, which has been good.
- Along with this, their communication with us can be shaky at times. There's a lot of uncertainty related to when classes will be in person or what the next few months will look like, and (likely for liability issues and because they're unsure themselves) they haven't been amazing at telling us what will happen. However, they've at least been honest about why they can't commit to anything.
- The Community Engagement module is awesome and it's incredible that we're talking about anti-racism, the social and structural determinants of health, and interprofessionalism and community outreach, but it's a bit frustrating that we can't actually be out in the community itself. This is less about WashU, though, and more about COVID.
- They can be a little too overboard with feedback. We have end of module surveys that take about 20-30 minutes and are mandatory (and actually contribute to our professionalism competency). It feels a little silly and patronizing to be "graded" on my ability to do a survey to tell them what I did and didn't like.
- Imo's isn't pizza and they keep telling me that it is.
That's my big list of complaints. I think you'll run into these issues at most schools, but I can only speak for WashU. They really do seem to be trying to listen to us and take our feedback into account, and I think a lot of these issues will be more ironed out as COVID winds down (fingers crossed, knock on wood, etcetera) and as they get the experience with my class and the new curriculum.