NSGY_and_Coffee
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2021
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 15
Got the email just a bit ago: it's an A!! (Interviewed 9/15)
I think every month based on last year's thread!How often does the committee meet? I was put on the defer list. Super disappointed.
Curious, too. I have not.Any 9/27 interviewers hear back yet?
I interviewed on the 15th and haven’t heard anything 🙁Has anyone that interviewed on or before sept. 15th not received a decisions yet?
Also were there any rejections or did they only send out As and deferrals?
One of my friends hasn't either, same day no decisionI interviewed on the 15th and haven’t heard anything 🙁
How did you find that out?Just found out my app was deferred to the next committee meeting. Really bummed but trying to hold out hope.
I got an email this morningHow did you find that out?
Internally ranked. Someone just asked this question in the virtual visitation day!Is Geisinger a true P/F in the preclinical years or is there an internal ranking?
My friend currently attends Geisinger and he was told there is no internal rank, which was a major reason he chose it. Is there only internal rank in the clinical years, and no internal rank in pre-clinical? Perhaps that's where the confusion is.
Edit: So I talked to my friend at Geisinger, and it seems M1/M2 are definitely pass/fail with no internal rank. However, M3/M4 have grades, so perhaps Geisinger does internal rank from M3 and M4 grades, which is conveyed through MSPE letter wording.
Well... that's definitely a problem for me.Michelle Schmude, the Associate Dean for Admissions, specifically said today that both preclinical and clerkship grades will be used to determine internal rank and be reflected in your MSPE letter. She used the example that one student may have a 79% average and another a 92% and the MSPE letter should distinguish between the two.
Virtual visitation? That was the most interview-like four hour experience I've had yet.Internally ranked. Someone just asked this question in the virtual visitation day!
my friend was wondering if they use events like this to subtly gauge who to take off the waitlistVirtual visitation? That was the most interview-like four hour experience I've had yet.
I thought it was relaxed and informative.Virtual visitation? That was the most interview-like four hour experience I've had yet.
I would agree, with the exception of the two active learning group sessions. Scrambling around like rabbits over two community-based case studies for tenish minutes at a time with your assigned small group, then feeling compelled to present our findings to 140-ppl as a means to impress admissions--was not 'relaxed and informative'. I enjoyed it and it rung home quite well their active-learning curriculum. But like I said, it felt more like an interview than anything else.I thought it was relaxed and informative.
I genuinely think it was just an exercise to demonstrate how classes are structured within their curriculum, so people can see whether they like that style. No one was evaluating us.I would agree, with the exception of the two active learning group sessions. Scrambling around like rabbits over two community-based case studies for tenish minutes at a time with your assigned small group, then feeling compelled to present our findings to 140-ppl as a means to impress admissions--was not 'relaxed and informative'. I enjoyed it and it rung home quite well their active-learning curriculum. But like I said, it felt more like an interview than anything else.
Yeah, I can verify this as I got my A without having attended one (stating this so that anyone else deciding to attend the virtual event can take a breather and relax). But sheesh that sounded stressful.I genuinely think it was just an exercise to demonstrate how classes are structured within their curriculum, so people can see whether they like that style. No one was evaluating us.
Just wanted to say there must have been some confusion in wording as the Phase 1 curriculum (first 18 months of preclinical work) is 100% True P/F and not reflected in MSPE, only in Phase 2 and 3 is there a ranking system Honors/High pass etc that counts for MSPE, honors societies etc. There is no overall class rank. I've confirmed this with multiple faculty here and I am a student here.Michelle Schmude, the Associate Dean for Admissions, specifically said today that both preclinical and clerkship grades will be used to determine internal rank and be reflected in your MSPE letter. She used the example that one student may have a 79% average and another a 92% and the MSPE letter should distinguish between the two.
I was at the infosession today as well and there wasn’t any ambiguity in her response. P/F on the surface, but always an untold grade on the backend, during all phases. I’m leaning toward her response. Also, how is a person ever targeted for tutoring during Phase 1 if it’s true P/F? The person needs to fail an exam first? Ouch if that’s true.Just wanted to say there must have been some confusion in wording as the Phase 1 curriculum (first 18 months of preclinical work) is 100% True P/F and not reflected in MSPE, only in Phase 2 and 3 is there a ranking system Honors/High pass etc that counts for MSPE, honors societies etc. There is no overall class rank. I've confirmed this with multiple faculty here and I am a student here.
Meanwhile my friend who is also a med student at Geisinger, believes that the entire curriculum, including Phase 1, 2, and 3 has no internal rank. Many of his peers share his belief.Just wanted to say there must have been some confusion in wording as the Phase 1 curriculum (first 18 months of preclinical work) is 100% True P/F and not reflected in MSPE, only in Phase 2 and 3 is there a ranking system Honors/High pass etc that counts for MSPE, honors societies etc. There is no overall class rank. I've confirmed this with multiple faculty here and I am a student here.
Do you mind sharing how AOA is determined for your class?Another disclaimer - policies on grading have changed within the past year, including for how things like AOA are given out. The curriculum has also changed considerably in the past year, so it's not unreasonable different people may not have up to date information.
+1My application was complete on 6/28 and I have not heard anything from them. OOS, ORM, 3.70, 512, very strong ECs
I am suppose to attend the visitation day on Monday 10/25 but I haven't received any link, How did you sign on and did they send you an email ahead of time?I was at the infosession today as well and there wasn’t any ambiguity in her response. P/F on the surface, but always an untold grade on the backend, during all phases. I’m leaning toward her response. Also, how is a person ever targeted for tutoring during Phase 1 if it’s true P/F? The person needs to fail an exam first? Ouch if that’s true.
They should email you a zoom link a few days beforeI am suppose to attend the visitation day on Monday 10/25 but I haven't received any link, How did you sign on and did they send you an email ahead of time?
Generally yes, as the more seats are filled, the less spaces there are to accept less people. The adcoms here generally phrase it as "the more time goes on, the more standards increase".My interview is in January, does interviewing so late put me at a disadvantage?
I attended the recruitment day on 10/18. The majority of people were wearing blazers/interview attire but were definitely others that were more casual. The day felt pretty casual with the exception of one presentation/group activity that people were referencing. However, I don't think the goal of the presentation/activity was to be an evaluation. It was more of a demonstration of small group/collaborative teaching that Geisinger uses.Attending the virtual recruitment day this coming Monday (the 25th). For those that completed one already, what was the dress code? Not sure if interview day attire would be overdoing it but definitely don't want to be under-dressed either .
Also, what was the general feel of the whole day? I figured it was supposed to be casual and informative, but I've seen a few people in this thread saying it seemed like another evaluation process. Thanks in advance!