That point was not missed on me. However, there is bias everywhere in relation to D.O. compounded by the negative connotation that LUCOM has unjustifiedly garnered. So if LUCOM students have acquired great residencies that is great. As any potential incoming student this information is invaluable in order to aide students in taking this program seriously, along with other factors, so please do not knock a very understanable question to a very understanable concern for any student considering a medical school.
So a few points that make it hard to address the spirit of your question in a meaningful way:
-you talk about LUCOM students “acquiring great residencies”, but what does that even mean? Most would assume that a great residency is one that is in the field the student wants located in a geographic region that’s acceptable to them. What are you using to quantify “great residencies” and what data would get you to your answer?
-what platform for comparison do you intend to use when measuring LUCOM against any other program? If one program matches 15% of its graduates into surgery, does that make them better than a program that only matched 7% of its graduates? Those are arbitrary percentages I have thrown out here, and so far as I know there is not a standard distribution of what specialties every graduating medical school class should have. There are too many factors to consider.
-as for bias, I didn’t encounter any based on my status as a DO or LUCOM student. I received over 40 interview invites (I was overly cautious and applied to way too many programs, 70 or 80 I think) and was well received at the interviews I attended. I am a middle of the road student, with average stats, applying pediatrics (average competitiveness for primary care specialties depending on the year) and I don’t feel like my options were limited being from LUCOM or due to my status as a DO. I didn’t want to apply to Harvard, and the only reason they would have interviewed me is if someone accidentally dropped my application on the “interview” pile as they were pushing it towards the trash - but that has more to do with me than anything. If I had made the grades and scored high enough on boards to meet their criteria, I probably could have gotten an interview at anywhere that generally accepts DOs. Part of the residency matching “game” is to know yourself, try to know the programs, and make tactical decisions about where you apply.
-As for DO bias, how single accreditation is going to change things up is anyone’s guess at this point. Some say it will be better, so say it will be more competitive, my guess is that for programs that have traditionally taken DOs, it won’t change anything, and for programs that have never taken DOs, single accreditation is not going to magically change their mind. It does set the stage for things that will change the DO/MD landscape 5-10 years after you have graduated probably.
I guess the take home message is that for the vast majority of students, the factors limiting their residency options have little to do with what school they attend and almost everything to do with their individual performance.
Also, whether it is LUCOM or any other school, I would caution you about fixating too much on residency matching statistics other than “overall” matching success. Everything else is widely variable year to year and person to person. If you are giving major consideration to how many people matched to what specialty and where when choosing what medical school you’re going to, you’re putting the cart light years ahead of the horse.
This is all just my opinion of course. I have always been very much the type of person that bends whatever circumstances I am handed to my own will, and have never let things like what school I attended dictate my future.