D
deleted1070467
I thought UCSF was releasing admissions starting January according to MSAR? Did anyone get told differently on their interview day?
"Dec 6, 2020" "friend" those comments seems sus to me
I think it depends on your interview date. Last year MSAR said Jan as well, though the first wave of decisions was released in mid-December. People who interviewed before Nov would probably hear soon....I thought UCSF was releasing admissions starting January according to MSAR? Did anyone get told differently on their interview day?
I think it depends on your interview date. Last year MSAR said Jan as well, though the first wave of decisions was released in mid-December. People who interviewed before Nov would probably hear soon....
Yeahh I agree! I was told that we will hear anytime between December and January with January being the latest. Maybe it’s likely that the first three groups of people who interview in September and October are probably the most likely to hear back next week. At least it’s my educated guess also. Same with @wstandI thought UCSF was releasing admissions starting January according to MSAR? Did anyone get told differently on their interview day?
What dates are they scheduling into?II today for MD/PRIME! Complete late September
sus to me as well lol if people got post ii decisions, more people would be saying so. my money's on next wednesday dec 16 for decisions to come out"Dec 6, 2020" "friend" those comments seems sus to me
My options were in January and early FebruaryWhat dates are they scheduling into?
I think email for everyone.Also, does anyone know if UCSF does calls/emails for accepted applicants or email for everyone?
Thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts. I'm a disadvantaged Asian American refugee whose ethnicity is technically equally represented in medicine and who grew up low income to a single parent. I've had success at many good schools so far (6 IIs so far across tiers) who value diversity outside of/in addition to race/ethnicity, but am concerned if race is considered strongly over all other diversity aspects.As for the second point about the representation amongst our class...interesting that you potentially see it as concerning? I'll just say that I don't think it's an explicit policy and hope that puts you at ease.
just my two cents but I highly doubt there is an explicit policy that would disadvantage anyone solely by race...the way I see it, UCSF is just making a genuine effort to accept people from historically disadvantaged backgrounds and create more representation in medicine. I don't think they're saying "ok let's accept X Asian people, Y Black people, Z Hispanic people". I think they are accepting qualified applicants that fit their school, while also considering how their background may have created obstacles for them, whether that be race, economics, or other hardships. I have a good feeling they are increasing representation of all disadvantaged people regardless of race. It just so happens that Black and Hispanic people are more likely to be economically disadvantaged than White or Asian people, so it's easy to look superficially and think it's only about race. Who knows- I'm not UCSF Adcom, but I hope I was able to provide you with a different perspective.Thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts. I'm a disadvantaged Asian American refugee whose ethnicity is technically equally represented in medicine and who grew up low income to a single parent. I've had success at many good schools so far (6 IIs so far across tiers) who value diversity outside of/in addition to race/ethnicity, but am concerned if race is considered strongly over all other diversity aspects.
I know nothing is guaranteed nor expected, but I was really excited about UCSF and am anxious about my chances if there are any policy changes, explicit or implicit.
I'd like to believe what you're saying, but from their disadvantaged status MSAR reporting it's actually gone down.just my two cents but I highly doubt there is an explicit policy that would disadvantage anyone solely by race...the way I see it, UCSF is just making a genuine effort to accept people from historically disadvantaged backgrounds and create more representation in medicine. I don't think they're saying "ok let's accept X Asian people, Y Black people, Z Hispanic people". I think they are accepting qualified applicants that fit their school, while also considering how their background may have created obstacles for them, whether that be race, economics, or other hardships. I have a good feeling they are increasing representation of all disadvantaged people regardless of race. It just so happens that Black and Hispanic people are more likely to be economically disadvantaged than White or Asian people, so it's easy to look superficially and think it's only about race. Who knows- I'm not UCSF Adcom, but I hope I was able to provide you with a different perspective.
well you do sound like a qualified applicant that fits their school! I understand your neuroticism; we're all worrying about what other applicants have that we don't. But even if they are specifically trying to increase their racial diversity, that's still only one factor. You still have awesome stats, a compelling background, and hopefully a demonstrated investment in their values of social justice and community activism. Your race is just one factor. I was also thinking that their race stats could be a reflection of their mission. Like another poster recently mentioned, their students are heavily involved in social justice and community organizing. The people most likely to do advocacy work with the underprivileged are those who belong to those groups themselves (even if total SES disadvantaged matriculants are slightly dropping). Again, that often means race/ethnic groups, but in your case it does not necessarily relate to race. And it's important that these communities their advocating for see themselves represented in the health professionals advocating for them.I'd like to believe what you're saying, but from their disadvantaged status MSAR reporting it's actually gone down.
I don't think there would be an explicit policy (because the people of CA just reaffirmed that admissions for public schools based on race is illegal), but implicitly there are ways around this.
You also bolded qualified, and my stats are above UCSF and EC's have gotten my II and 2 A's from T15's, but I do have a thing for UCSF because of its mission for social justice and community activism. I understand how competitive this process is and am not expecting anything, just bummed if UCSF is considering race above disadvantaged status.
EDIT: Also, just a data point that is from my own personal neuroticism, but all the other 4 UCs I applied to sent a secondary back to me in a very reasonable time (UCLA within days). UCSF took the long end (10 weeks) for the secondary to come back. Whatever prioritization algorithm they used, for me it did not prioritize disadvantaged status it seems.
I was complete in Oct. pre-II R about a week agohas anyone who applied in october heard back? either II or pre II R?
sorry to hear that. not to be annoying, but its hard not to. when in october were you complete? and oos or IS?I was complete in Oct. pre-II R about a week ago
OOS and complete 10/14. Took the last MCAT possible for this cycle.sorry to hear that. not to be annoying, but its hard not to. when in october were you complete? and oos or IS?
I was complete in October and haven’t heard back for anything - neither II nor pre-II R.has anyone who applied in october heard back? either II or pre II R?
Same - completed 10/13.I was complete in October and haven’t heard back for anything - neither II nor pre-II R.
Especially after a waitlist from other school, big time :')who else is freaking out about the 16th coming up so soon? :')
ME TOO!!!!!Especially after a waitlist from other school, big time :')
by any chance did you also interview at UCSD?? xDME TOO!!!!!
yes omg! got waitlisted and it broke my heart :'( so i really need thisby any chance did you also interview at UCSD?? xD
Omggg me too!! UCSD and UCSF the only two IIs LOL and waitlisted at UCSD so RIP haha please feel free to DM me for emotional support for each other hahayes omg! got waitlisted and it broke my heart :'( so i really need this
Just got the pre-R II, I'll be back for residency maybe haha
Aw sorry yall! Good luck with your other schools! Can I ask when yall were complete?Just got that Pre-II R. Complete 9/23. Good luck to everyone!
yes omg i will!!Omggg me too!! UCSD and UCSF the only two IIs LOL and waitlisted at UCSD so RIP haha please feel free to DM me for emotional support for each other haha
I am in a similar boat as you -- or close to it. (a) AMCAS verified on 28 Sep, (b) Secondary received on 4 Nov, (c) Secondary submitted on 12 Nov...and now waitingHi friends, my AMCAS app was verified on 10/13, secondary was received 11/16 (super fortunate for the invite), and secondary was submitted 11/23. Does anyone happen to know when applicants in this position get notified of II’s?
Complete 8/16 and nothing. I assume they are mulling over whether to give us IIs?Anyone complete around ~8/20 hear back recently?
i was told one of my interviewers would call me if acceptedI think email for everyone.
Oh really? You mean either faculty or med student who interviewed an applicant? If I'm lucky enough to be accepted, there's a good chance that I would never answer the call (so many spam/random calls with the bay area code).i was told one of my interviewers would call me if accepted
Unfortunately, they only accept updates after an interview invite.Do they accept pre II updates? There’s not a spot on the portal to upload but email?
Website as well as the adcoms on the interview day said anytime between December and January. But based on the last three years thread on decision dates, we are speculating dec 16th, next wed? lol but can be later.Hi everyone! Do we know when the admissions office will start releasing post-interview decisions for those that have already interviewed?
Ahh, let's hope! Thanks for clarifyingWebsite as well as the adcoms on the interview day said anytime between December and January. But based on the last three years thread on decision dates, we are speculating dec 16th, next wed? lol but can be later.
I believe you just sent a thank you letter to the admissions email. That's what I did.Hey does anyone know their interview thank you note policy?
Saw this coming, Pre-II R just now. Complete 9/18, good luck to everyone still in the running!