If you look at previous threads you will see plenty of Rs for both IS and OOS late April, so I assume they keep most post-II R in silence. Just passing the 2 week mark, (I extrapolate based on many evidence) is not sufficient to prevent one from getting a rejection.
Damn.
Oh man, keep us updated! In a similar boat but interviewed september
don't think they do., i've tried doing some research and asking current students earlier and i couldn't turn up any evidence of purely merit scholarships
if you don’t mind, can you let us know what they say? Been waiting since interview in Nov (PURCH applicant!)
if you don’t mind, can you let us know what they say? Been waiting since interview in Nov (PURCH applicant!)
thank you!!They responded basically saying I’m still under review and will get a decision before April 30th
I interviewed the 24th of jan and got in exactly two weeks later.
This year??Wow. Guess MoMo_FaFa and I are the only Jan interviews waiting on news...
I and other people on this thread haven’t heard yet, sdn is also a small portion of applicants. Some people get the A after two weeks and some get an R but based on months prior in this thread and last year, most people get active consideration after 2 weeks and hear later in the cycle
Yeah I'm waiting as well from end of Jan. It feels doomed at this point things are going to be even slower now with Covid19 the committee is not going to want to meet probably haha
I interviewed in October, and there are some that interviewed in September/August. You are no more doomed than the rest of us. Let’s save our stress for Friday’s haha
Silly question but you guys got emails right? You didnt randomly check the portal or something?
Honestly, WL at this school is closer to an A than an R based on yields...
I was mid jan so a WL/ A could still be coming!
Based on my limited research I can extrapolate the following:
Dude MSAR itself says last cycle the WL had a 75/100 yield...
That data from MSAR is apparently outdated, or at least doesn't resemble the previous cycle or the one before it. Look at previous threads it was mentioned. Not possible for that data to be from last cycle.
Why would you say MSAR data from last cycle is outdated? MSAR is way more accurate than SDN...SDN is not the whole app pool, remember.
Well my pt is even the yield isn't 75/100 it could be 60/100 and ofc some ppl who get the A here will choose to go here but the WL is for ppl who get into UMASS and then pick and go to Harvard or something..
When did you interview?( just wanna know if Im nect)
Early Jan, but i don't think when you interviewed matters any more since there seems to be no pattern to who is hearing back.
SDN users are more likely to be the type of competitive applicant who would get a WL/A than an R post interview
Honestly as April is rapidly approaching Im really thinking Im looking at an R at this point...any 1/24ers heard back yet?
I think I remembered them saying that but with all the worry and doubt, it just gets confusing. I hope you hear back soon too if you haven’t yet! When did you interview?
idk if this helps but I interviewed for PURCH in November and haven’t heard back yet either! and for whatever it’s worth I’ve had a pretty good cycle otherwise (which definitely doesn’t mean I’ll get in here, but just for reference/to try to ease some nerves— seems like they’re just kind of slow!)
